In a comment on my post announcing the publication of “For My Son, A Kind of Prayer” at The Good Men Project (TGMP), AMM wrote:
I visited the place a year or two ago and read a number of the articles, and they tout a version of masculinity which, underneath all the verbiage, is basically just a “kinder, gentler” version of the same old male privilege. I remember that he-who-must-not-be-named (but whose initials are HS) was an honored contributor, which IMHO does not speak well for it, but was entirely consistent with the rest of what was there.
This made me think that, first, especially when posting the announcement on this site, I should have given an explanation for why I agreed to let TGMP publish my work, since I share AMM’s reservations, or at least I have similar ones, about what the site is all about. Second, it made me think that I should post the entire poem here so that people who will not go to TGMP will have a chance to read it if they want to. (The entire poem is below the fold.)
The short explanation as to why I agreed to have my work published in TGMP is that Noah Brand, the site’s still relatively new editor-in-chief, solicited me directly. (A longer explanation is perhaps a post unto itself about what it would mean, from a feminist/pro-feminist/feminist-friendly perspective, to put men’s experience at the center of discussion.) Noah is the founder–one of the founders?– of No, Seriously, What About The Menz? (NSWTM), which appears on Alas’ blog roll. I read the blog occasionally, and while I find the comments troubling, troublesome and sometimes offensive, I think that the posts embody a discussion of men and masculinity that is both necessary and fruitful. NSWTM is, obviously, not a space where women’s issues are front and center; nor could you accurately call it a male feminist/pro-feminist space, given that the people who comment there are often openly hostile to feminism. Nonetheless, it is in its mission a feminist-friendly space, and I think it is important and worth respecting that they are trying to have a discussion among and about men that is inclusive of all men, from a variety of perspectives, who want to engage in a respectful and thoughtful way.
Which does not mean that I think NSWTM succeeds in this regard–my own experience is that it often does not–but that I respect what Noah Brand was and is trying to do there and that I respect the fact that he is trying to do the same kind of thing over at TGMP. Something he said recently in an interview on The Jane Dough is worth thinking about:
Women face forms of oppression and a constant barrage of microaggressions that men do not, no question. But there are also several decades and at least three waves of feminist thought and activism to help them engage with those problems. Men face different problems, different microaggressions and stereotypes, and we’re still working on finding the language to talk about those. Feminism has the right tools for the job, but has been historically reluctant to engage with men’s issues, and the thing calling itself the Men’s Rights Movement is about as useful as a land war in Asia. (Emphasis mine.)
While I find Noah’s formulation at the end of this quote kind of awkward, I do think he’s right about this: to the extent that feminism has, rightfully, reasonably, placed women’s experience at the center of its analysis, the feminist “toolbox” will not automatically fit men’s experience, and so men need to find a language that will name our experience accurately and that will open up the kinds of analysis and transformation that accurate naming makes possible. There’s no way to know ahead of time whether TGMP will be the place where that language truly begins to take shape, but I think it’s important to be part of an attempt that is as big and as public as TGMP is. That’s why, when Noah solicited me, I agreed to send him some of my work.
And now, here’s the poem. Please remember that it does contain graphic descriptions of sexual violence against both men and women: Continue reading





