Nancy

How can you regret never having existed?

I love this line of thought coming out of anti-choicers. THEY KNOW its bizzare and nonsensical, yet they trot it out over and over again in the most fascinating displays of cognitive dissonance.

Think obout it!

Nancy C

I am not an “anti-choicer” I believe in choice like I said in an earlier post the choice should be the murderee not the murderer.

Talk about “cognitive dissonance” when someone does what he knows to be wrong it is always more pleasent to call it by a more acceptable term like “the right to choose” instead if murder of an infant. It’s like calling homosexuals “gay instead of refering to it as a perversion and like using the term “affermative action” for racial preference. the list goes on and on. You can get the picture. Truth and logic is the stumbling block of those that are trying to promote the socialist agenda. But there are those of use that can see through the deception.

WAKE UP AMERICA!!

Nancy C

That is a very good explanation of what abortion really is. I never thought of that way. Most poeple look at it from the perspective of the parent or should I say “the boilogical reason for the fetus to exist” because they are not yet a parent if they abort the baby.

This has changed my entire outlook on the issue. the baby is the one to be considered not the one who would rather not be bothered with a child.

I came here seeking answers today and you were here to help me. I apperciate that very much. I was trying to make a decision and I now have. thanks to you, I will seek a means to have someone adopt my child instead of having an abortion since I will not be able to care for her due to my physical and financial condition.

I am so glad that I came to this site today!

Thanks again

Molly

Want to bet that if we goad this “Nancy” character enough we’ll discover someone with RAHOWA tattooed on his/her arm, “Nordic Thunder” playing on his/her mp3 device, and a swords-sized cross engraved with runes hanging from his/her neck?

The people in China kill every child that is born to parents that already have a child. and almost all of the females that are born. And look how well they are doing, well the men have to go to Japan and surronding areas to find a wife but thats not a problem.

What would we do with so many kids to take care of anyway it makes it harder to live with your parents when you have a bunch of kids running around of your own. They shouldn’t be burdened with that kind of responsibility it’s enough that we have to live with them while we get a start in life. I don’t know, maybe they should have aborted us. well anyway like Dan said in his post, the fetus don’t know about it anyway or wouldn’t remember so it is not such a big deal

And here is something you probably have not thought about if tou don’t like the people that are aborting their babies just think, if they get rid of their babies there will be less people thinking the way they do in the future so in the furure, only the people that teach what you believe will be around because the abortionists will not have offspring to grow up to abort their babies so I guess that in the end you win.

Kirk

Nancy

Off the wall? Look who’s talking, Ms. Cell-cluster=Adult. I’m sorry, you can’t play the “I’m so innocent I can’t understand these allegations” card after the last post you made under the name “Nancy”. That was naked racism, homophobia, AND misogyny, the bigot trifecta if I ever saw it.

But maybe you’re right. Perhaps you aren’t an adult skinhead type, but a self-righteous 15 year old Alex P. Keaton type who thinks she has all the answers, and considers herself the savviest of geniuses for posting replies to her own posts under pseudonyms. If this is the case, I recommend you go out there and experience a little more of the harshness of life before criticizing the decisions of other women.

No you don’t understand you must wait for the infant to be old enough to make the decision before you Kill them. If at that time they decide that they are too much of a burdon to the parents that were responsible for their existance then you can Kill them but then even the socialist among you would consider that to be murder.

Wait, do you have any clue what “socialist” means? Probably not. You have the elegance and insight of R Robot. And the posting under multiple names? WTF? Are you like some sort of 13 year old who’s new to this whole “internet” thang? Or what?

Try reading the Comunist Menifesto.

Nancy C

Spelled destructive as “distructive”, used the contraction of it is to refer to ITS teachings, used “heard” where she should have used herd, spelled crowd as “croud”, repeatedly spells until as “untill”, and botches communist manifesto as “Comunist Menifesto.”

But of course a few spelling errors aren’t the measure of a person. So we can also look at her strange, comma-lacking sentence structure, which is filled with all kinds of goofy melodramatic moments like “the ones following the socialist ways” and “we that do understand.”
Nancy, talking like that makes you sound like an apocalyptic prophet ranting about his favorite alien-satanist cult conspiracy, which you may think is perfectly appropriate, but only inspires snickering and eye-rolling in us.

But then, maybe your intent isn’t to reach us in courteous debate, but to mock us to make yourself feel righteous, in which case you have also failed since you keep coming across as a regressive clown. I’m am increasingly convinced that you are a 15 to 13 year old who is too young and inexperienced to realize SHE’S the one with the “heard mentality” who is “following the croud”.

As for your accusations of socialism, I don’t know about Raznor but I think socialism is as irresponsible as libertarianism, so if you still feel like making a fool of yourself by posting again you’d best try a different angle of paranoia. Go back to your plagiarized Reagan notes and I’m sure you’ll find something to unthinkingly regurgitate.

Next to me, Nancy is the most honest person on the internet.

Actually, Mary Rosh was the pseudonym John Lott used to support his claim that more guns does not equal more crime. In other words, “Molly” and “Kirk” are to “Nancy” as “Mary Rosh” is to John Lott.

Socialism and Communism are not the same thing. Communism is an anti-individualist, anti-totalitarian dictum that has always been totalitarian in practice. Socialism is an economic theory that is completely unrelated to individualism or totalitarianism. Hence the existence of “Socialist Democracies” such as Sweden.

The Communist Manifesto is just another in a long list of utopic writings in the tradition of Sir Thomas More and Plato that was intended as a political tool. Marx intended Communism to be a global revolution, but he was thinking of it as starting in a place like Germany, where the population is urbanized and well-educated to the extent that literacy is expected of any individual in the populace, hence his appeal to the proletariat as opposed to the peasant. However the Communist movement centered in non-urbanized peasant societies like Russia and China.

I hope this was informative. Please don’t mention socialism as a blanket term since it’s not. Socialism has nothing to do with a woman’s right to choose. A pro-choice person might be Socialist or anti-Socialist, and a Socialist might be pro-choice or pro-life. And a pro-life person might be Socialist or anti-Socialist and an anti Socialist might be pro-choice or pro-life. There is no relationship between the two dictums.