<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fatness and Moral Panic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: If I eat more than you, it&#8217;s for one simple reason. &#124; The Fat Nutritionist</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-364690</link>
		<dc:creator>If I eat more than you, it&#8217;s for one simple reason. &#124; The Fat Nutritionist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-364690</guid>
		<description>[...] not because I&#8217;ve never been read the Riot Act Obesity Act, and certainly not because I am an immoral, no-good, greedy, wanton symbol of evil Western imperialism and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not because I&#8217;ve never been read the Riot Act Obesity Act, and certainly not because I am an immoral, no-good, greedy, wanton symbol of evil Western imperialism and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If I eat more than you, it&#8217;s for one simple reason. &#171; Mouthfeel: The Story of Fat</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-318291</link>
		<dc:creator>If I eat more than you, it&#8217;s for one simple reason. &#171; Mouthfeel: The Story of Fat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-318291</guid>
		<description>[...] not because I&#8217;ve never been read the Riot Act Obesity Act, and certainly not because I am an immoral, no-good, greedy, wanton symbol of evil Western imperialism and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not because I&#8217;ve never been read the Riot Act Obesity Act, and certainly not because I am an immoral, no-good, greedy, wanton symbol of evil Western imperialism and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feministe &#187; Terrible Genius</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-285786</link>
		<dc:creator>Feministe &#187; Terrible Genius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-285786</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] This is all so tied into the idea that the REAL concern for fat women is not about obesity but because it causes moral panic because the woman is OUT OF BOUNDS. Same as a sexually &#8220;promiscuous&#8221; woman. Amp posted about this a while ago here and I thought it was such a good article: It strikes me as intrinsically connected to both misogyny and homophobia, this. The terror that fat seems to inspire, the moral terror, seems rooted in the same fear and loathing that has traditionally been reserved for the promiscuous woman. She is not obeying. She is “out of bounds”–much like the fat that oozes over the sides of the airplane seat. Her problem is a surfeit of appetite–which is the reason that no matter what medical studies might actually show, people will continue to frame the problem of obesity wholly in terms of eating and of appetite. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] This is all so tied into the idea that the REAL concern for fat women is not about obesity but because it causes moral panic because the woman is OUT OF BOUNDS. Same as a sexually &#8220;promiscuous&#8221; woman. Amp posted about this a while ago here and I thought it was such a good article: It strikes me as intrinsically connected to both misogyny and homophobia, this. The terror that fat seems to inspire, the moral terror, seems rooted in the same fear and loathing that has traditionally been reserved for the promiscuous woman. She is not obeying. She is “out of bounds”–much like the fat that oozes over the sides of the airplane seat. Her problem is a surfeit of appetite–which is the reason that no matter what medical studies might actually show, people will continue to frame the problem of obesity wholly in terms of eating and of appetite. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anorexia Nervosa, Obesity, Moral Panic and Christina Hoff Sommers</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-103387</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anorexia Nervosa, Obesity, Moral Panic and Christina Hoff Sommers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 17:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-103387</guid>
		<description>[...] More substantively, as a JAMA study published last year showed, "overweight" Americans with BMIs of 25-30 actually live longer than Americans who aren't overweight. The panic over weight has very little to do with health. It is instead a true moral panic - a reflection of the fear that Americans are over-indulgent and pleasure-driven. As Elkins wrote, "Eating is the new sex. Anti-fat hysteria is the new Puritanism." [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More substantively, as a JAMA study published last year showed, &#8220;overweight&#8221; Americans with BMIs of 25-30 actually live longer than Americans who aren&#8217;t overweight. The panic over weight has very little to do with health. It is instead a true moral panic - a reflection of the fear that Americans are over-indulgent and pleasure-driven. As Elkins wrote, &#8220;Eating is the new sex. Anti-fat hysteria is the new Puritanism.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Big Fat Carnival - First Edition!</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-97564</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Big Fat Carnival - First Edition!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 00:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-97564</guid>
		<description>[...] Alas, a Blog: Fatness and Moral Panic The terror that fat seems to inspire, the moral terror, seems rooted in the same fear and loathing that has traditionally been reserved for the promiscuous woman. She is not obeying. She is "out of bounds""“much like the fat that oozes over the sides of the airplane seat. Her problem is a surfeit of appetite"“which is the reason that no matter what medical studies might actually show, people will continue to frame the problem of obesity wholly in terms of eating and of appetite. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alas, a Blog: Fatness and Moral Panic The terror that fat seems to inspire, the moral terror, seems rooted in the same fear and loathing that has traditionally been reserved for the promiscuous woman. She is not obeying. She is &#8220;out of bounds&#8221;"“much like the fat that oozes over the sides of the airplane seat. Her problem is a surfeit of appetite&#8221;“which is the reason that no matter what medical studies might actually show, people will continue to frame the problem of obesity wholly in terms of eating and of appetite. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BritGirlSF</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-37933</link>
		<dc:creator>BritGirlSF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-37933</guid>
		<description>Emma,
I've been given disaprooving glances, and heard comments like "such a pretty face, it's a shame, she'd be really hot if she lost 30 pounds", and I'm a size 8! In my social group (San Francisco, indie hipster types - basically people who tend to go see a lot of live music) anything over a size 4 is frowned upon.
I think the fatness=out of control assumption is right on. In my experience the "all women need to be skinny" stuff tends to come from men (and sometimes women too, sadly) in whom the Madonna/whore complex is alive and well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emma,<br />
I&#8217;ve been given disaprooving glances, and heard comments like &#8220;such a pretty face, it&#8217;s a shame, she&#8217;d be really hot if she lost 30 pounds&#8221;, and I&#8217;m a size 8! In my social group (San Francisco, indie hipster types - basically people who tend to go see a lot of live music) anything over a size 4 is frowned upon.<br />
I think the fatness=out of control assumption is right on. In my experience the &#8220;all women need to be skinny&#8221; stuff tends to come from men (and sometimes women too, sadly) in whom the Madonna/whore complex is alive and well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isabelle</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20903</link>
		<dc:creator>isabelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20903</guid>
		<description>a couple of differences though:

1) sex is not a limited resource, while there is only so much food to go around in the world at one point in time.

2) people don't die out of lack of sex. 

though i think that the anti-fat problem is tied more to socioeconomic levels in north america, since the affluent can usually afford their personal trainers and their organic trans fat-free foods and all that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a couple of differences though:</p>
<p>1) sex is not a limited resource, while there is only so much food to go around in the world at one point in time.</p>
<p>2) people don&#8217;t die out of lack of sex. </p>
<p>though i think that the anti-fat problem is tied more to socioeconomic levels in north america, since the affluent can usually afford their personal trainers and their organic trans fat-free foods and all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20904</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20904</guid>
		<description>This rambles, but I am reminded of the movie "Real Women Have Curves." The story was a lot about being comfortable with yourself and refusing to apologize. The mother kept telling her daughter not to be "shameless." It was the attitude as much as the action that upset her.

How dare someone be happy having broken the stricture of society? You get away with "being" outside the norm, as long as you suffer for it and pay lip service to the superiority of the dominant ideals and images by engaging in activities designed to take you closer to them, even if there is no chance of success.

God forbid you just leave people as they are, because then all the effort you've put into things might not have been necessary. What if "fat" people can be happy? What if you don't have to be a size six to be loved? What kind of insecurities do you have to face up to if you lose that convinient excuse and are still lonely?

Extrapolate to the spiritual and you've opened up a great big can of worms: what if "they" are right? What if you can be counted as a good person even if you didn't check off 1,2,3 on the "Big List of Things that Get You Into Heaven"?

Worrying about appearances gives us something obvious and measurable to take the place of internal elements that are harder to quantify or even acknowledge.

It would be much easier if I was judged in this life and the next solely on my outside and never had to tackle dreams and faith and emotions and all that stuff that's even messier than sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This rambles, but I am reminded of the movie &#8220;Real Women Have Curves.&#8221; The story was a lot about being comfortable with yourself and refusing to apologize. The mother kept telling her daughter not to be &#8220;shameless.&#8221; It was the attitude as much as the action that upset her.</p>
<p>How dare someone be happy having broken the stricture of society? You get away with &#8220;being&#8221; outside the norm, as long as you suffer for it and pay lip service to the superiority of the dominant ideals and images by engaging in activities designed to take you closer to them, even if there is no chance of success.</p>
<p>God forbid you just leave people as they are, because then all the effort you&#8217;ve put into things might not have been necessary. What if &#8220;fat&#8221; people can be happy? What if you don&#8217;t have to be a size six to be loved? What kind of insecurities do you have to face up to if you lose that convinient excuse and are still lonely?</p>
<p>Extrapolate to the spiritual and you&#8217;ve opened up a great big can of worms: what if &#8220;they&#8221; are right? What if you can be counted as a good person even if you didn&#8217;t check off 1,2,3 on the &#8220;Big List of Things that Get You Into Heaven&#8221;?</p>
<p>Worrying about appearances gives us something obvious and measurable to take the place of internal elements that are harder to quantify or even acknowledge.</p>
<p>It would be much easier if I was judged in this life and the next solely on my outside and never had to tackle dreams and faith and emotions and all that stuff that&#8217;s even messier than sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelite</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20905</link>
		<dc:creator>kelite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20905</guid>
		<description>um, wow. can i just thank elkins for a very articulate and well done post? i know i'm probably being dramatic, and i realize that i am not on oprah, but that post just slayed me. 

having experienced the fat thing from both sides, i am thoroughly disgusted with the way a lot of people treat the fat. i come from a family with a long and rich history of bieng short and wide. i am 5 ft 3 in. before i had my son, i wore a size 10. i was admired, and i pitied those who were larger than me. i berated fat people for their lack of will power, and i tried to get every family member on a diet and exercise regime. i did not heed my mother's warning that i too was in for a shock when i chose to have children. 

now, 7 years after the birth of my son, i am still a size 16. i have tried countless diets and have lost and regained the same 30 pounds about 100 times. i have scales, books, videos, posters, cds... and nothing helped. finally i gave up to being fat. i eat regularly, walk every day, take vitamins, and i'm a healthy size 16. which is apparently the size god intended me to be. but now i get berated, i get lectures, i get asked if i really should have a slice of birthday cake, i get oinked at by rowdy teens, i get glares from people in the mall, etc. what kills me is that being a fat women seems to mean i am stupid, poor, and promiscuous... at least that's how people treat me. and i think elkins hit the nail on the head in explaining why people are so scared of fat. 

not being a homosexual, i can't say if elins hit the same nail for homosexuality, but it seems to make sense. thanks for a great post, sorry if i rambled. oh, and for a great book, read Fat!So? by Marilyn Wann. excellent read :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um, wow. can i just thank elkins for a very articulate and well done post? i know i&#8217;m probably being dramatic, and i realize that i am not on oprah, but that post just slayed me. </p>
<p>having experienced the fat thing from both sides, i am thoroughly disgusted with the way a lot of people treat the fat. i come from a family with a long and rich history of bieng short and wide. i am 5 ft 3 in. before i had my son, i wore a size 10. i was admired, and i pitied those who were larger than me. i berated fat people for their lack of will power, and i tried to get every family member on a diet and exercise regime. i did not heed my mother&#8217;s warning that i too was in for a shock when i chose to have children. </p>
<p>now, 7 years after the birth of my son, i am still a size 16. i have tried countless diets and have lost and regained the same 30 pounds about 100 times. i have scales, books, videos, posters, cds&#8230; and nothing helped. finally i gave up to being fat. i eat regularly, walk every day, take vitamins, and i&#8217;m a healthy size 16. which is apparently the size god intended me to be. but now i get berated, i get lectures, i get asked if i really should have a slice of birthday cake, i get oinked at by rowdy teens, i get glares from people in the mall, etc. what kills me is that being a fat women seems to mean i am stupid, poor, and promiscuous&#8230; at least that&#8217;s how people treat me. and i think elkins hit the nail on the head in explaining why people are so scared of fat. </p>
<p>not being a homosexual, i can&#8217;t say if elins hit the same nail for homosexuality, but it seems to make sense. thanks for a great post, sorry if i rambled. oh, and for a great book, read Fat!So? by Marilyn Wann. excellent read :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss America</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20906</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20906</guid>
		<description>Maybe someone has already written about this - if so, sorry to repeat the point.

I gather that for the past few decades there has in fact been an increase in Christian diet plans, weight-loss programs that quite literally equate fat with sin.  I know very little about the subject, but for anyone interested, there is at least one book on the subject called &lt;i&gt;Born Again Bodies.&lt;/i&gt;  (I haven't read it, for the record, I'm just aware of it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe someone has already written about this - if so, sorry to repeat the point.</p>
<p>I gather that for the past few decades there has in fact been an increase in Christian diet plans, weight-loss programs that quite literally equate fat with sin.  I know very little about the subject, but for anyone interested, there is at least one book on the subject called <i>Born Again Bodies.</i>  (I haven&#8217;t read it, for the record, I&#8217;m just aware of it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryGarth</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20907</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryGarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20907</guid>
		<description>This is great, and very insightful, but I'll quibble with the idea that it is becoming "less and less socially acceptable to try to regulate sexual behavior."  I'd say in the current political environment, it's becoming more and more acceptable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great, and very insightful, but I&#8217;ll quibble with the idea that it is becoming &#8220;less and less socially acceptable to try to regulate sexual behavior.&#8221;  I&#8217;d say in the current political environment, it&#8217;s becoming more and more acceptable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20908</link>
		<dc:creator>DonBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20908</guid>
		<description>First off: although my first name is Don, and my last name begins with P, I am not Don P. from the other threads.

Second: I once saw, in a Christian bookstore in Texas, a book called "Help Lord -- The Devil Wants Me Fat!"  I didn't want to give them any of my money, but I've regretted not buying that book ever since, because I'm really curious about it. (I see it starts at $1.90 from Amazon now...oh, it turns out it advocates a 10-day fast "to destroy the devil's food stronghold in one's mind"!  Aiiee!  ("Mmmm...devil's food."))

Third: I suspect that a lot of the "panic" is class panic rather than moral panic.  I noticed on the other thread that Don P. talked a lot about eating too many Big Macs and pizza, which are "marked" as lower class, as is being overweight in general.

Fourth:  although evolutionary psychology makes for facile arguments, it might be a factor here. In an environment of scarcity, if you see a fat person, you might well conclude that that person's got their share of the food, and yours too. Which could understandably anger you if you're hungry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off: although my first name is Don, and my last name begins with P, I am not Don P. from the other threads.</p>
<p>Second: I once saw, in a Christian bookstore in Texas, a book called &#8220;Help Lord &#8212; The Devil Wants Me Fat!&#8221;  I didn&#8217;t want to give them any of my money, but I&#8217;ve regretted not buying that book ever since, because I&#8217;m really curious about it. (I see it starts at $1.90 from Amazon now&#8230;oh, it turns out it advocates a 10-day fast &#8220;to destroy the devil&#8217;s food stronghold in one&#8217;s mind&#8221;!  Aiiee!  (&#8221;Mmmm&#8230;devil&#8217;s food.&#8221;))</p>
<p>Third: I suspect that a lot of the &#8220;panic&#8221; is class panic rather than moral panic.  I noticed on the other thread that Don P. talked a lot about eating too many Big Macs and pizza, which are &#8220;marked&#8221; as lower class, as is being overweight in general.</p>
<p>Fourth:  although evolutionary psychology makes for facile arguments, it might be a factor here. In an environment of scarcity, if you see a fat person, you might well conclude that that person&#8217;s got their share of the food, and yours too. Which could understandably anger you if you&#8217;re hungry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20909</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20909</guid>
		<description>The fat-gay comparison is unconvincing. Fat people face appearance based prejudice, but homosexuals themselves are into appearance based prejudice. How many 300 pound "twinks" populate the pretty boy galleries? It is thus a somewhat hypocritical to lecture on about "lookism" when the homosexual subculture is one of the main offenders. In fact the same could be said of race and homosexuals. A Google search on the complaints of non-white homosexuals amply shows a strong measure of racism within homosexual ranks. 

And so what if there is moralism in the debates? Homosexuals themselves never fail to invoke moralistic tones- whether it be ludricous comparisons to Rosa Parks, or lectures about "lookism" or "disrimination". And your claim that fat people are "persecuted" and "loathed" is not all its made out to be. For one, until recent times, fat has been seen as a symbol of prosperity and good health, hence the ancient phrase "as the fat of the land". Various cultures vary on how they view fat, with black culture for example admiring a "thick" woman or Hispanics appreciating a voluptuous figure. But even if this were not so, the issue of hypocrisy again comes up. Homosexuals themselves prize and favor young, non-fat people, whether they be muscular or wispy pretty boys. "Moralistic" lectures on this score only call to mind the old saw: "Practice what you preach".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fat-gay comparison is unconvincing. Fat people face appearance based prejudice, but homosexuals themselves are into appearance based prejudice. How many 300 pound &#8220;twinks&#8221; populate the pretty boy galleries? It is thus a somewhat hypocritical to lecture on about &#8220;lookism&#8221; when the homosexual subculture is one of the main offenders. In fact the same could be said of race and homosexuals. A Google search on the complaints of non-white homosexuals amply shows a strong measure of racism within homosexual ranks. </p>
<p>And so what if there is moralism in the debates? Homosexuals themselves never fail to invoke moralistic tones- whether it be ludricous comparisons to Rosa Parks, or lectures about &#8220;lookism&#8221; or &#8220;disrimination&#8221;. And your claim that fat people are &#8220;persecuted&#8221; and &#8220;loathed&#8221; is not all its made out to be. For one, until recent times, fat has been seen as a symbol of prosperity and good health, hence the ancient phrase &#8220;as the fat of the land&#8221;. Various cultures vary on how they view fat, with black culture for example admiring a &#8220;thick&#8221; woman or Hispanics appreciating a voluptuous figure. But even if this were not so, the issue of hypocrisy again comes up. Homosexuals themselves prize and favor young, non-fat people, whether they be muscular or wispy pretty boys. &#8220;Moralistic&#8221; lectures on this score only call to mind the old saw: &#8220;Practice what you preach&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mythago</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20910</link>
		<dc:creator>mythago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20910</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;but homosexuals themselves are into appearance based prejudice&lt;/i&gt;

Unlike heterosexuals. You will never see a skin mag aimed at heterosexual men that favors young, thin, white women.

But seriously, isn't it interesting how 'phobes forget there are female homosexuals? Anyone able to make the argument that lesbians prefer thin and young with a, um, straight face?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but homosexuals themselves are into appearance based prejudice</i></p>
<p>Unlike heterosexuals. You will never see a skin mag aimed at heterosexual men that favors young, thin, white women.</p>
<p>But seriously, isn&#8217;t it interesting how &#8216;phobes forget there are female homosexuals? Anyone able to make the argument that lesbians prefer thin and young with a, um, straight face?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q Grrl</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20911</link>
		<dc:creator>Q Grrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20911</guid>
		<description>All I gotta say is "I heart fat dykes!"

:)

(I actually don't like the fat-gay comparison because it assumes a common non-normative experience predicated on a eurocentric, wealthy status quo.... but that's just me!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I gotta say is &#8220;I heart fat dykes!&#8221;</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>(I actually don&#8217;t like the fat-gay comparison because it assumes a common non-normative experience predicated on a eurocentric, wealthy status quo&#8230;. but that&#8217;s just me!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jam</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20912</link>
		<dc:creator>jam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20912</guid>
		<description>is it just me or when you hear someone say "the homosexuals" do you get the feeling they've only heard of such creatures through rough description?

anyways, here's a good book on fatness &#038; moral terror:

&lt;a href="http://www.umass.edu/umpress/fall_03/lebesco.html"&gt;Revolting Bodies: The Struggle to Redefine Fat Identity&lt;/a&gt; by Kathleen Lebesco (UMA, 2004)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it just me or when you hear someone say &#8220;the homosexuals&#8221; do you get the feeling they&#8217;ve only heard of such creatures through rough description?</p>
<p>anyways, here&#8217;s a good book on fatness &#038; moral terror:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.umass.edu/umpress/fall_03/lebesco.html">Revolting Bodies: The Struggle to Redefine Fat Identity</a> by Kathleen Lebesco (UMA, 2004)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilkka Kokkarinen</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20913</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilkka Kokkarinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20913</guid>
		<description>isabelle: "sex is not a limited resource, while there is only so much food to go around in the world at one point in time"

Sex is a very limited resource, at least for the average straight man.

(Same way money is a very limited resource for most people, even though the government could theoretically print as many bills as it wants.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isabelle: &#8220;sex is not a limited resource, while there is only so much food to go around in the world at one point in time&#8221;</p>
<p>Sex is a very limited resource, at least for the average straight man.</p>
<p>(Same way money is a very limited resource for most people, even though the government could theoretically print as many bills as it wants.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20914</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20914</guid>
		<description>Ilkka, I find it odd that you swing back and forth between complaining that men can't find sex and complaining that women don't diet enough to be good enough for men's sexual attentions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilkka, I find it odd that you swing back and forth between complaining that men can&#8217;t find sex and complaining that women don&#8217;t diet enough to be good enough for men&#8217;s sexual attentions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20915</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20915</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Sex is a very limited resource, at least for the average straight man.

The point you're missing is that if one person has sex, that does not limit the ability of another person -- even a poor, persecuted straight male -- to have sex, even with the same partner that the first person had sex with.  Whereas, once the cake's eaten, the cake is not available for anyone else.

Except, perhaps, the earthworms.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sex is a very limited resource, at least for the average straight man.</p>
<p>The point you&#8217;re missing is that if one person has sex, that does not limit the ability of another person &#8212; even a poor, persecuted straight male &#8212; to have sex, even with the same partner that the first person had sex with.  Whereas, once the cake&#8217;s eaten, the cake is not available for anyone else.</p>
<p>Except, perhaps, the earthworms.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RA</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20916</link>
		<dc:creator>RA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/12/14/fatness-and-moral-panic/#comment-20916</guid>
		<description>Wait, are there people in this comment thread arguing that it's rational to hate fat people because they are eating up your food? What? What? Are you trying to say that we are running out of food in the United States and that's why we hate fat people? 

Are you high? I hate people who argue like they are high, don't you know dope is a limited resource and once you've smoked it there won't be any left for me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, are there people in this comment thread arguing that it&#8217;s rational to hate fat people because they are eating up your food? What? What? Are you trying to say that we are running out of food in the United States and that&#8217;s why we hate fat people? </p>
<p>Are you high? I hate people who argue like they are high, don&#8217;t you know dope is a limited resource and once you&#8217;ve smoked it there won&#8217;t be any left for me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
