« Monday Baby Blogging

Home
Does Ohio’s anti-SSM amendment protect girlfriend-beaters? »

New to the blogroll: Stone Court

Posted by Ampersand | January 17th, 2005

I probably won’t post anything further today, since we’ve set today aside for watching The Lord of The Rings, extended DVD version, which as I understand it is something like 11 or 12 hours long. (Geeky? Us? What makes you say that?)

(I should clarify that “we” means me and several of my housemates, but not Bean, who finds the whole project somewhat bewildering. At best.)

In the meanwhile, how did I not have Stone Court on my blogroll? What’s wrong with me? It’s a fucking fantastic feminist blog, especially if you like an empirical/social sciencey approach to issues; go check it out is my advice.

| This entry was posted by Ampersand and is filed under Link farms. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “New to the blogroll: Stone Court”

  1. media girl Writes:
    January 17th, 2005 at 2:55 pm

    I just added them, and then saw your post. 100% agreed!

    This comment was written by media girl.
    Report this comment to the moderators
  2. La Lubu Writes:
    January 17th, 2005 at 4:51 pm

    Stone Court is indeed good, even though for some strange reason I can’t access the comments section….

    This comment was written by La Lubu.
    Report this comment to the moderators
  3. Fred Vincy Writes:
    January 17th, 2005 at 8:38 pm

    Thank you, Amp!

    And thank you, Media Girl and La Luba.

    I’ll try to look into the comments thing, but I suspect it may just be Haloscan being slow to respond. In the meantime, though, please feel free to email us at

    fredatstonecourt AT yahoo DOT com OR
    maryatstonecourt AT yahoo DOT com

    This comment was written by Fred Vincy.
    Report this comment to the moderators
  4. Echidne of the snakes Writes:
    January 17th, 2005 at 8:58 pm

    A new one for me, too!

    Ampersand, The Lords of the Ring should be read as a book. It’s sacrilege to only see the movie version. And remember that I said that the hobbits are really women: smaller, nicer and less belligerent ;)!

    This comment was written by Echidne of the snakes.
    Report this comment to the moderators
  5. Ampersand Writes:
    January 18th, 2005 at 1:15 am

    Echidne, I agree it would be terribly wrong to see the movie exclusively; rest assured, I’ve read the novels several times.

    This comment was written by Ampersand.
    Report this comment to the moderators
  6. nolo Writes:
    January 19th, 2005 at 8:42 am

    I watched the entire extended-version LOTR on new year’s day. With breaks to make snacks, it took about 13 hours. Way worth it, though.

    And yes, I’ve read the books. I don’t know how many times, though.

    This comment was written by nolo.
    Report this comment to the moderators

Leave a Reply

If you have questions about the moderation policies here, please read this post. Short version: treat other posters with respect.

(Need to know how to create blockquotes and links, i.e., linked text?)

If your submitted comment fails to appear, without even an error or "waiting for moderation" message, then our spam-blocking program may have blocked your comment by mistake. When this happens, please contact the moderators right away so we can rescue your comment!

Markup Controls