http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/04/29/amanda-at-pandagon-on-the-mens-rights-movement/ Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about. Fri, 16 May 2008 04:11:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/04/29/amanda-at-pandagon-on-the-mens-rights-movement/#comment-34101 CaptDMO Tue, 03 May 2005 04:41:37 +0000 http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/04/29/amanda-at-pandagon-on-the-mens-rights-movement/#comment-34101 Great! I'll be sure to check in here as well as Jamses,and Trishes,and Jesicas,and Hugos,and Sophies,and Wendys to see updated commentary on" Amandas overview of the Mens Rights Movement." Be sure to lable it appropriately, not merely "an overview", but "Amandas Overview ". I'd hate to get it confused with other overviews from different perspectives. Great!
I’ll be sure to check in here as well as Jamses,and Trishes,and Jesicas,and Hugos,and Sophies,and Wendys to see updated commentary on” Amandas overview of the Mens Rights Movement.” Be sure to lable it appropriately, not merely “an overview”, but “Amandas Overview “. I’d hate to get it confused with other overviews from different perspectives.

]]> http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/04/29/amanda-at-pandagon-on-the-mens-rights-movement/#comment-33896 Amanda Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:39:46 +0000 http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/04/29/amanda-at-pandagon-on-the-mens-rights-movement/#comment-33896 Thanks for the link. The MRAs are beginning to show their faces, with the same ol' stats they always use and the accusation that "description"="ad hominem" attack. Interesting that mere descriptions piss them off--I think my theory that they like to cling to the shadows most of the time is pretty accurate. Thanks for the link. The MRAs are beginning to show their faces, with the same ol’ stats they always use and the accusation that “description”=”ad hominem” attack. Interesting that mere descriptions piss them off–I think my theory that they like to cling to the shadows most of the time is pretty accurate.

]]>