We’ve come to it at last

Posted by Pseudo-Adrienne | May 18th, 2005

This post was removed by request of the author.

6 Responses to “We’ve come to it at last”

  1. Sarah in Chicago Writes:

    if you are interested, here are the groups opposed to Patricia Owen:

    http://saveourcourts.civilrights.org/nominees/nominees/owen_opposed.html

    and here are the groups opposed to Janice Rodgers Brown:

    http://saveourcourts.civilrights.org/nominees/nominees/brown_opposed.html

    I’m wondering if this is going to be a ‘cuban missile crisis’ or will the clock actually tick past 12? I’m seriously liking Boxer right now :)


  2. Anne Writes:

    Well, they sure as heck wouldn’t be on the White House’s Most Favored Femmes list if they were in favor of women’s rights, you know.

    Today I left a terse message for my Senator (Salazar) protesting his participation in the attempt to find a “compromise” with the Right-wingnuts that would allow some of these lunatic nominees to come to a vote.

    Frist doesn’t have the votes to go “nuclear” and if the Democrats and those few, principled Republicans can just keep track of their backbones….


  3. Kenneth Wells Writes:

    I am a US Milirary Retired NCO and has spent 20+ years defending the rights that the republican powers to be are trying to take away and I want you all to know that I am behind you all one hundred percent.
    Now if any of you know where I can find a Blog pertaining to military information in the northwest to the left of the right I would appreciate it.


  4. Kim (basement variety!) Writes:

    Hey Kenneth! Thanks for your service and congrats on the retirement. I’m sure it’s been an interesting time to serve.

    The closest thing I know to a west based military blog is the Daily Kos a political blog run by a former Army guy out of San Francisco. Much of what is discussed there is brilliant and enlightening.


  5. alsis38 Writes:

    Kenneth, you might try:

    http://www.democracyrising.us/

    Or http://www.dissidentvoice.org/


  6. acm Writes:

    actually, they’re not even attacking their political ideologies (which are shared in many cases by those who’ve been approved), but indications that these justices can’t lay aside their own prejudices in order to follow legal precedent. that’s a job disqualification, pure and simple.

    as for other myths related to the filibuster, I recommend
    Media Matters top 10 fibs list


Leave a Reply

If you have questions about the moderation policies here, please read this post. Short version: treat other posters with respect.

If your submitted comment fails to appear, without even an error or "waiting for moderation" message, then our spam-blocking software may have blocked your comment. Please contact the moderators immediately so we can rescue your comment. If this happens repeatedly, you might visit Akismet's comment form to tell them they're falsely identifying you as a spammer.

Markup Controls