Your Grandmother’s and Cleopatra’s contraception
| May 20th, 2005This post was removed by request of the author.
This post was removed by request of the author.
| This entry was posted by Pseudo-Adrienne and is filed under Abortion & reproductive rights, Anti-Contraceptives/EC zaniness, Feminism, sexism, etc, Whatever. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
If you have questions about the moderation policies here, please read this post. Short version: treat other posters with respect.
(Need to know how to create blockquotes and links, i.e., linked text?)
If your submitted comment fails to appear, without even an error or "waiting for moderation" message, then our spam-blocking program may have blocked your comment by mistake. When this happens, please contact the moderators right away so we can rescue your comment!
Alas, a blog runs on
WordPress blogging and review software.
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
May 20th, 2005 at 11:59 am
We’ve come along way since using dung and sheep entrails.
Not that far: “lambskin” condoms are still available (though not as effective as synthetics, and not recommended for protection against STDs). Dung seems to have fallen out of favor, though.
This comment was written by Kevin T. Keith.Report this comment to the moderators