Your Grandmother’s and Cleopatra’s contraception
| May 20th, 2005This post was removed by request of the author.
This post was removed by request of the author.
| This entry was posted by Pseudo-Adrienne and is filed under Abortion & reproductive rights, Anti-Contraceptives/EC zaniness, Feminism, sexism, etc, Whatever. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
If you have questions about the moderation policies here, please read this post. Short version: treat other posters with respect.
If your submitted comment fails to appear, without even an error or "waiting for moderation" message, then our spam-blocking software may have blocked your comment. Please contact the moderators immediately so we can rescue your comment. If this happens repeatedly, you might visit Akismet's comment form to tell them they're falsely identifying you as a spammer.
Alas, a blog runs on
WordPress.
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
May 20th, 2005 at 11:59 am
We’ve come along way since using dung and sheep entrails.
Not that far: “lambskin” condoms are still available (though not as effective as synthetics, and not recommended for protection against STDs). Dung seems to have fallen out of favor, though.
This comment was written by Kevin T. Keith.Report this comment to the moderators