Women’s eNews’ Cheers & Jeers
| July 12th, 2005This post was removed by request of the author.
This post was removed by request of the author.
| This entry was posted by Pseudo-Adrienne and is filed under Abortion & reproductive rights, Anti-feminists and their pals, Feminism, sexism, etc, International issues, Supreme Court Issues. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
If you have questions about the moderation policies here, please read this post. Short version: treat other posters with respect.
If your submitted comment fails to appear, without even an error or "waiting for moderation" message, then our spam-blocking software may have blocked your comment. Please contact the moderators immediately so we can rescue your comment. If this happens repeatedly, you might visit Akismet's comment form to tell them they're falsely identifying you as a spammer.
Alas, a blog runs on
WordPress blogging and review software.
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
July 12th, 2005 at 11:13 am
Excuse me, I have to take advil for the emotional aspects of my headache.
This comment was written by Elena.Report this comment to the moderators
July 13th, 2005 at 12:21 pm
I don’t consider the Blagojevich bill worthy of a cheer, for a simple reason: mandates for specific health insurance coverage make health insurance more expensive. The reason that many Americans are uninsured is that the cost of insurance is rising. Even many employers are finding that it’s too expensive to extend free or subsidized insurance to their employees. If insurance companies are required to cover specific procedures, no matter how important those procedures may be, they will raise prices to recoup the payments they make for those procedures, and some group of people on the margin who are just barely able to afford insurance now will be priced out of the market. I’m sure there are many uninsured people who would love to be able to buy cheap insurance that doesn’t cover breast cancer screenings if it meant they’d be insured against being hit by a bus, because that would be superior to the total non-coverage they have right now. Unfortunately, in a misguided effort to help people who are already insured, we’ve taken away that option.
This comment was written by Amy Phillips.Report this comment to the moderators
July 13th, 2005 at 12:28 pm
…mandates for specific health insurance coverage make health insurance more expensive. The reason that many Americans are uninsured is that the cost of insurance is rising.
That reasoning is far too simplistic. Mandates for specific health insurance coverage may indeed contribute to increasing insurance costs, but it is far from a major cause for HI cost increases. Loss of investment income by HI companies due to the stagnating market is one of major reasons for rising insurance costs and dwarfs any increases caused by actual coverage of treatments/illnesses.
This comment was written by Jake Squid.Report this comment to the moderators