<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Creation Theory Seeks Inclusion In Kansas Curriculum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Log -- David Chess</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-281149</link>
		<dc:creator>Log -- David Chess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-281149</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Much more sensible, New Creation Theory Seeks Inclusion In Kansas Curriculum; go Flying Spaghetti Monster! [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Much more sensible, New Creation Theory Seeks Inclusion In Kansas Curriculum; go Flying Spaghetti Monster! [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-91147</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-91147</guid>
		<description>I still have misgivings about this FSM religion. Do you just have to dress like a pirate or do you actually have to be a pirate? If global warming is a result of fewer pirates, then it would stand to reason that FSM followers should be real pirates and not just dress like them. Unless, of course, it was just the way pirates dressed that kept off global warming. Then I would understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still have misgivings about this FSM religion. Do you just have to dress like a pirate or do you actually have to be a pirate? If global warming is a result of fewer pirates, then it would stand to reason that FSM followers should be real pirates and not just dress like them. Unless, of course, it was just the way pirates dressed that kept off global warming. Then I would understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-54790</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 02:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-54790</guid>
		<description>The AFA is doing a poll on evolution and ID. 

http://www.afa.net/petitions/intelligentdesign/takesurvey.asp

pass it on to all the intelligent secular science people. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AFA is doing a poll on evolution and ID. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.afa.net/petitions/intelligentdesign/takesurvey.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.afa.net/petitions/intelligentdesign/takesurvey.asp</a></p>
<p>pass it on to all the intelligent secular science people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frida</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-54383</link>
		<dc:creator>Frida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-54383</guid>
		<description>In the name of the Meatballs, the Sauce, and the Garlic Toast, amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the name of the Meatballs, the Sauce, and the Garlic Toast, amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-54115</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-54115</guid>
		<description>DP, if SF is San Francisco, then you realize the standing problem right away:  I can't speak with authority to the standing requirements to sue school districts over curriculum, but one would think at a minimum the plaintiff would have to be a resident and taxpayer in the district, and maybe a parent of a student.  Where the curriculum is a state-wide matter, and if there is taxpeyer standing (I don't know if there is), being a state resident might be enough-  but California isn't imposing statewide "intelligent design" that I know of.  And if it is, we're in bigger trouble than I thought.

However, the notion that "intelligent design" violates the "non-dualism" tenet of Vedanta is useful information.  I'm an ignoramus concerning Eastern religion.  Can you unpack the "non-dualism" concept?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DP, if SF is San Francisco, then you realize the standing problem right away:  I can&#8217;t speak with authority to the standing requirements to sue school districts over curriculum, but one would think at a minimum the plaintiff would have to be a resident and taxpayer in the district, and maybe a parent of a student.  Where the curriculum is a state-wide matter, and if there is taxpeyer standing (I don&#8217;t know if there is), being a state resident might be enough-  but California isn&#8217;t imposing statewide &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; that I know of.  And if it is, we&#8217;re in bigger trouble than I thought.</p>
<p>However, the notion that &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; violates the &#8220;non-dualism&#8221; tenet of Vedanta is useful information.  I&#8217;m an ignoramus concerning Eastern religion.  Can you unpack the &#8220;non-dualism&#8221; concept?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP_in_SF</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-54112</link>
		<dc:creator>DP_in_SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-54112</guid>
		<description>Thomas: I'll be that plaintiff.  I've practiced Vedanta almost all my adult life, the whole nine yards, yoga, meditation, scriptural study, devotional chanting, pilgrimages to India. At the very least, intelligent design is anthema to our concept of advaita (non-dualism). 

Jake and Barbara: Your posts reconfirm my sincere belief that atheists are the only people capable of keeping the religious honest. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas: I&#8217;ll be that plaintiff.  I&#8217;ve practiced Vedanta almost all my adult life, the whole nine yards, yoga, meditation, scriptural study, devotional chanting, pilgrimages to India. At the very least, intelligent design is anthema to our concept of advaita (non-dualism). </p>
<p>Jake and Barbara: Your posts reconfirm my sincere belief that atheists are the only people capable of keeping the religious honest. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-54076</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 16:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-54076</guid>
		<description>All kidding aside, it seems to me that one good strategy to attack these crypto-preachers is from the point of view of a non-Judeo-Christian religious tradition.  A community member having a view that has historically been recognized as a religion, but with a very different creation story from the J/C one, is a good plaintiff to complain about how much the J/C worldview is incorporated into an "intelligent design" program.  Say, Hindus, Shintoists, etc?  Folks subscribing to indiginous faiths?  

(Most Pagans, Raelians, etc. make bad plaintiffs, in my view, because sadly they face the additional hurdle of convincing the judge that theirs is a real religion.)

Ideally, a plaintiff would be a member of a traditionally recognized non-Judeo-Christian religion, and one with a fair number of adherents in the U.S., if not in that state or county.  They would either (1) challenge the "intelligent design" curriculum as pushing a religious idea antithetical to their faith, or (2) demand equal time in the curriculum for the scientific evidence that backs up the broad outlines of their creation story.

I'm too bad at comparative religions to attempt an explanation of the ways in which "intelligent design" is irreconsilable with the creation story of other faiths.  Anybody want to take a shot at it? 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All kidding aside, it seems to me that one good strategy to attack these crypto-preachers is from the point of view of a non-Judeo-Christian religious tradition.  A community member having a view that has historically been recognized as a religion, but with a very different creation story from the J/C one, is a good plaintiff to complain about how much the J/C worldview is incorporated into an &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; program.  Say, Hindus, Shintoists, etc?  Folks subscribing to indiginous faiths?  </p>
<p>(Most Pagans, Raelians, etc. make bad plaintiffs, in my view, because sadly they face the additional hurdle of convincing the judge that theirs is a real religion.)</p>
<p>Ideally, a plaintiff would be a member of a traditionally recognized non-Judeo-Christian religion, and one with a fair number of adherents in the U.S., if not in that state or county.  They would either (1) challenge the &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; curriculum as pushing a religious idea antithetical to their faith, or (2) demand equal time in the curriculum for the scientific evidence that backs up the broad outlines of their creation story.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m too bad at comparative religions to attempt an explanation of the ways in which &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; is irreconsilable with the creation story of other faiths.  Anybody want to take a shot at it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ol cranky</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53964</link>
		<dc:creator>ol cranky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53964</guid>
		<description>we're all just sea monkeys in some kids dirty aquarium</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we&#8217;re all just sea monkeys in some kids dirty aquarium</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modern Major-General</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53960</link>
		<dc:creator>Modern Major-General</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53960</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;They are very cute and have never invaded any other sovereign nation! &lt;/i&gt;

Not yet, anyway. 

 Personally, I don't trust any mammal that lays eggs and produces venom.  That just ain't right. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>They are very cute and have never invaded any other sovereign nation! </i></p>
<p>Not yet, anyway. </p>
<p> Personally, I don&#8217;t trust any mammal that lays eggs and produces venom.  That just ain&#8217;t right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53906</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53906</guid>
		<description>Hey!! I have to stick up for the platypuses here. Lay off the platypus! They are very cute and have never invaded any other sovereign nation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!! I have to stick up for the platypuses here. Lay off the platypus! They are very cute and have never invaded any other sovereign nation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krupskaya</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53762</link>
		<dc:creator>Krupskaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53762</guid>
		<description>"Noodly appendage" makes me laugh until I weep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Noodly appendage&#8221; makes me laugh until I weep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Countess</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53729</link>
		<dc:creator>The Countess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53729</guid>
		<description>All I can say, in full agreement, is &lt;i&gt;aaaarrrrrgggghhhh!!!!&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say, in full agreement, is <i>aaaarrrrrgggghhhh!!!!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modern Major-General</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53728</link>
		<dc:creator>Modern Major-General</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53728</guid>
		<description>No, no, no! You guys have it all wrong! 

All matter, energy and what-all-else in the Universe (or rather,  Multiverse), was formed when the three primordial entities; NIS (Chaos), W-E (Order) and the mysterious pseudo-lifeform known by many names including "the Craft" and "the Meta-Force" (Balance), met each other in open combat for the first time.  After the Multiverse was created, NIS and W-E sought to dominate it, and the Craft resolved to create harmony by keeping the two of them in check. 

The three created agents to accomplish their missions. W-E formed the Sea-Urchin Collective, a race of psychic beings bent on the complete subjugation and domination of everything in existence and eliminating all semblance of individual thought.  NIS created the great, omnipotent, omniscient and omni-voracious Zpltzu, Lord of Misery, Master of the Macabre and Gerent of Chaos.  And the Craft worked through the Pangaean Gods, under the great Menokon, and founded the Order of the Craft, a coalition of  sorcerers who channel the Craft-energies through mystical golden gauntlets. 

The Urchins were the ones who created Earth and genetically engineered life on it. Although Zpltzu briefly took control of Earth, in a bloody reign that lasted millions of years, the Urchins resumed power and have  had authority over every human government since the time of Ancient Egypt. 

Or something. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no, no! You guys have it all wrong! </p>
<p>All matter, energy and what-all-else in the Universe (or rather,  Multiverse), was formed when the three primordial entities; NIS (Chaos), W-E (Order) and the mysterious pseudo-lifeform known by many names including &#8220;the Craft&#8221; and &#8220;the Meta-Force&#8221; (Balance), met each other in open combat for the first time.  After the Multiverse was created, NIS and W-E sought to dominate it, and the Craft resolved to create harmony by keeping the two of them in check. </p>
<p>The three created agents to accomplish their missions. W-E formed the Sea-Urchin Collective, a race of psychic beings bent on the complete subjugation and domination of everything in existence and eliminating all semblance of individual thought.  NIS created the great, omnipotent, omniscient and omni-voracious Zpltzu, Lord of Misery, Master of the Macabre and Gerent of Chaos.  And the Craft worked through the Pangaean Gods, under the great Menokon, and founded the Order of the Craft, a coalition of  sorcerers who channel the Craft-energies through mystical golden gauntlets. </p>
<p>The Urchins were the ones who created Earth and genetically engineered life on it. Although Zpltzu briefly took control of Earth, in a bloody reign that lasted millions of years, the Urchins resumed power and have  had authority over every human government since the time of Ancient Egypt. </p>
<p>Or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyra</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53706</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53706</guid>
		<description>I hereby proclaim that the theory of Intelligent Design is flawed, lacking, and unfit for teaching in public schools due to the absence of the most important piece of information the theory should have:

WHO CREATED THE "INTELLIGENT DISIGNER" ?????

Awesome theory.  Flying Spaghetti Monster and pirate costumes.  Brilliant.

But Jake Squid's Unintelligent Design theory takes the cake.  It does indeed explain things that Intelligent Design never will.  Aside from the platypus and Moral Majority, there are such things as religions that tout celibacy while insisting that the same God who wants us to abstain from sex, also created humans so that sex is their method of procreation.  Also the practice of naming professional baseball teams after various colors of socks.  And how about the codpiece?

For other theories, talk to Amanda at Pandagon about the Church of the Mouse and Disco Ball--they believe the Universe was coughed up by the Great Cat in the form of a hairball after the Goddess shooed Him off Her bed for attacking Her lover's foot.

Also how about the one with the Egyptian God Min jacking off, and forming the stars out of drops of semen.  (Those would be the same stars that are depicted adorning the body of the Goddess Nuit, by the way.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hereby proclaim that the theory of Intelligent Design is flawed, lacking, and unfit for teaching in public schools due to the absence of the most important piece of information the theory should have:</p>
<p>WHO CREATED THE &#8220;INTELLIGENT DISIGNER&#8221; ?????</p>
<p>Awesome theory.  Flying Spaghetti Monster and pirate costumes.  Brilliant.</p>
<p>But Jake Squid&#8217;s Unintelligent Design theory takes the cake.  It does indeed explain things that Intelligent Design never will.  Aside from the platypus and Moral Majority, there are such things as religions that tout celibacy while insisting that the same God who wants us to abstain from sex, also created humans so that sex is their method of procreation.  Also the practice of naming professional baseball teams after various colors of socks.  And how about the codpiece?</p>
<p>For other theories, talk to Amanda at Pandagon about the Church of the Mouse and Disco Ball&#8211;they believe the Universe was coughed up by the Great Cat in the form of a hairball after the Goddess shooed Him off Her bed for attacking Her lover&#8217;s foot.</p>
<p>Also how about the one with the Egyptian God Min jacking off, and forming the stars out of drops of semen.  (Those would be the same stars that are depicted adorning the body of the Goddess Nuit, by the way.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Kiddle</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53679</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53679</guid>
		<description>LOL!  Terry Pratchett advances a theory, I believe in &lt;i&gt;Small Gods&lt;/i&gt;, that the universe was put together by a bunch of the Supreme Being's underlings in a desperate hurry right before some deadline.  It would explain a lot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!  Terry Pratchett advances a theory, I believe in <i>Small Gods</i>, that the universe was put together by a bunch of the Supreme Being&#8217;s underlings in a desperate hurry right before some deadline.  It would explain a lot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53538</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53538</guid>
		<description>lol Jake ... I always kinda imagined (even though I am atheist) some omnipotent diety waking up late one morning after a roaring bender the night before, with the mother of all hangovers and notices the platypus that has been apparently miraculously created on the coffee-table and goes "Dude, what the fuck was I drinking last night?!"

I figure it was gin, after all, gin, as well all well know, is the fount of all evil ... tequila, now, on the other hand ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol Jake &#8230; I always kinda imagined (even though I am atheist) some omnipotent diety waking up late one morning after a roaring bender the night before, with the mother of all hangovers and notices the platypus that has been apparently miraculously created on the coffee-table and goes &#8220;Dude, what the fuck was I drinking last night?!&#8221;</p>
<p>I figure it was gin, after all, gin, as well all well know, is the fount of all evil &#8230; tequila, now, on the other hand &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53510</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53510</guid>
		<description>Yes, that ought to be the punchline to the sad joke that Kansas wants to make of science:  Believing in intelligent design doesn't lead to any particular conclusion about who the designer was, exactly, and certainly not to the inevitable conclusion that the designer was a triune God.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that ought to be the punchline to the sad joke that Kansas wants to make of science:  Believing in intelligent design doesn&#8217;t lead to any particular conclusion about who the designer was, exactly, and certainly not to the inevitable conclusion that the designer was a triune God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Squid</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53506</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/29/new-creation-theory-seeks-inclusion-in-kansas-curriculum/#comment-53506</guid>
		<description>Although I appreciate the scientific evidence brought forth on behalf of the Flying Spaghetti Monster theory of Intelligent Design, I have to support an older, more traditional theory of everything.  To wit, Sammael the Blind Idiot God sometimes called the theory of Unintelligent Design.  Think about it for a minute.  The world makes a lot more sense if you realize that it was created by an all powerful being who is both blind and irrational.  How else could the platypus or the Moral Majority possibly exist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I appreciate the scientific evidence brought forth on behalf of the Flying Spaghetti Monster theory of Intelligent Design, I have to support an older, more traditional theory of everything.  To wit, Sammael the Blind Idiot God sometimes called the theory of Unintelligent Design.  Think about it for a minute.  The world makes a lot more sense if you realize that it was created by an all powerful being who is both blind and irrational.  How else could the platypus or the Moral Majority possibly exist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
