<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Coming Decimation of Abortion Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Say it with me: Justice Alito</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-335962</link>
		<dc:creator>Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Say it with me: Justice Alito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-335962</guid>
		<description>[...] The Coming Decimation of Abortion Rights  Excellent analysis by Ampersand of Alas (a blog) of how Alito&#8217;s confirmation will affect abortion rights. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Coming Decimation of Abortion Rights  Excellent analysis by Ampersand of Alas (a blog) of how Alito&#8217;s confirmation will affect abortion rights. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gonzales vs Carhart: The Biggest Threat Is Buried Deep In The Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-283477</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gonzales vs Carhart: The Biggest Threat Is Buried Deep In The Decision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-283477</guid>
		<description>[...] (I&#8217;ve drawn on some past posts of mine in writing this new post: here, here and here.)  Here is an AP article reporting the Gonzales decision, and here is the text of the decision itself. (back) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (I&#8217;ve drawn on some past posts of mine in writing this new post: here, here and here.)  Here is an AP article reporting the Gonzales decision, and here is the text of the decision itself. (back) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ampersand</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-101356</link>
		<dc:creator>Ampersand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-101356</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,&lt;a href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/07/22/the-argument-that-changed-me-from-pro-life-to-pro-choice/" rel="nofollow"&gt; here's my story&lt;/a&gt;, for what it's worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,<a href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/07/22/the-argument-that-changed-me-from-pro-life-to-pro-choice/" rel="nofollow"> here&#8217;s my story</a>, for what it&#8217;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Rowe</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-101338</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-101338</guid>
		<description>I have a question. I am interested in what might change one's stance on abortion rights. Is there anyone who was previously pro-choice that is now pro-life? Or is there anyone who is now pro-life who was raised in a pro-choice household?

If anyone has a personal story about what made them change positions, I would love to get their feedback.

Thanks.

Jonathan Rowe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question. I am interested in what might change one&#8217;s stance on abortion rights. Is there anyone who was previously pro-choice that is now pro-life? Or is there anyone who is now pro-life who was raised in a pro-choice household?</p>
<p>If anyone has a personal story about what made them change positions, I would love to get their feedback.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Jonathan Rowe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rad Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-96313</link>
		<dc:creator>Rad Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 04:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-96313</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I'm dubious about the validity of this map. Michigan and Delaware are highly likely to ban abortion?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don't know anything about Delaware, but I do live in Michigan, and am quite sure the map is accurate so far as that goes. &lt;a href="http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/who-decides/state-profiles/michigan.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The NARAL "Report Card" gives Michigan an "F" rating for state abortion laws&lt;/a&gt; (we're tied with Mississippi and Arkansas; only Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Louisiana, and North Dakota have more onerous restrictions) are worse. The pre-Roe abortion ban has never been repealed (so will remain on the books to re-activate if Roe is ever overturned). Both houses of the state legislature are controlled by the anti-abortion Republicans heavily influenced by the Religious Right in Western Michigan and by Michigan Right to Life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m dubious about the validity of this map. Michigan and Delaware are highly likely to ban abortion?</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know anything about Delaware, but I do live in Michigan, and am quite sure the map is accurate so far as that goes. <a href="http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/who-decides/state-profiles/michigan.html" rel="nofollow">The NARAL &#8220;Report Card&#8221; gives Michigan an &#8220;F&#8221; rating for state abortion laws</a> (we&#8217;re tied with Mississippi and Arkansas; only Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Louisiana, and North Dakota have more onerous restrictions) are worse. The pre-Roe abortion ban has never been repealed (so will remain on the books to re-activate if Roe is ever overturned). Both houses of the state legislature are controlled by the anti-abortion Republicans heavily influenced by the Religious Right in Western Michigan and by Michigan Right to Life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zan</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94221</link>
		<dc:creator>Zan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94221</guid>
		<description>This map makes me want to curl up in a corner and cry. *sigh* I live firmly in the middle of all that red and know, without a doubt, that my state would outlaw abortion completely if it were possible. I also happen to have a health condition that makes pregnancy dangerous for me, although it may not actually kill me. It could well leave me damaged, with long-term organ injury and incapable of actually caring for my child, but probably won't kill me. Which means, to the oh-so-wise people in my state that any fetus I happen to conceive would outweigh my needs and I would just be damned. Without federal protection, there will be some truely horrific anti-abortion laws passed. Around here, the theory goes that health exceptions are too vague and could be exploited, so it's better not to have them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This map makes me want to curl up in a corner and cry. *sigh* I live firmly in the middle of all that red and know, without a doubt, that my state would outlaw abortion completely if it were possible. I also happen to have a health condition that makes pregnancy dangerous for me, although it may not actually kill me. It could well leave me damaged, with long-term organ injury and incapable of actually caring for my child, but probably won&#8217;t kill me. Which means, to the oh-so-wise people in my state that any fetus I happen to conceive would outweigh my needs and I would just be damned. Without federal protection, there will be some truely horrific anti-abortion laws passed. Around here, the theory goes that health exceptions are too vague and could be exploited, so it&#8217;s better not to have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Empiricist</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94212</link>
		<dc:creator>Empiricist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94212</guid>
		<description>I'm dubious about the validity of this map.  Michigan and Delaware are highly likely to ban abortion?  I haven't been able to find the original article with the methodology, but it comes from the Alan Guttmacher Institue, a think tank whose stated goal is to "protect the reproductive choices of all women and men in the United States and throughout the world."  The "research" produced by ideological think tanks should be regarded as guilty until proven innocent even if the ideology is correct.  AGI clearly fits the bill.

Unless Justice Kennedy is much friendlier to women's rights than I think he is, I think women will be better off if Roe is overturned than if the Supreme Court keeps it around in name but guts it in fact.  If Roe is overturned, the religious right won't be satisfied with anything other than a total ban, and an attempt to impose such a ban would produce a pretty serious voter backlash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m dubious about the validity of this map.  Michigan and Delaware are highly likely to ban abortion?  I haven&#8217;t been able to find the original article with the methodology, but it comes from the Alan Guttmacher Institue, a think tank whose stated goal is to &#8220;protect the reproductive choices of all women and men in the United States and throughout the world.&#8221;  The &#8220;research&#8221; produced by ideological think tanks should be regarded as guilty until proven innocent even if the ideology is correct.  AGI clearly fits the bill.</p>
<p>Unless Justice Kennedy is much friendlier to women&#8217;s rights than I think he is, I think women will be better off if Roe is overturned than if the Supreme Court keeps it around in name but guts it in fact.  If Roe is overturned, the religious right won&#8217;t be satisfied with anything other than a total ban, and an attempt to impose such a ban would produce a pretty serious voter backlash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonF</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94205</link>
		<dc:creator>RonF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94205</guid>
		<description>O.K.  Fair enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.K.  Fair enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Even with Alito, reproductive rights are not doomed</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94199</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Even with Alito, reproductive rights are not doomed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94199</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday, I posted a rather doom-and-gloom post, arguing that if they get the chance, Republicans will not be content merely to allow the abortion decision to return to the states. Instead, as the nationwide "partial birth" abortion ban suggests, they will seek to chip away at abortion rights on the national level, stripping away the availability of abortion even in firmly "pro-choice" states like New York. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday, I posted a rather doom-and-gloom post, arguing that if they get the chance, Republicans will not be content merely to allow the abortion decision to return to the states. Instead, as the nationwide &#8220;partial birth&#8221; abortion ban suggests, they will seek to chip away at abortion rights on the national level, stripping away the availability of abortion even in firmly &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; states like New York. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ampersand</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94180</link>
		<dc:creator>Ampersand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94180</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What if you're strongly pro-choice but somewhat anti-feminist (in their current manifestation)?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Then please don't post on this thread again.

Keep in mind that you can always revive one of the past discussions on this subject if you want to post something - for instance, this post on the prospect of &lt;a href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/04/22/quick-paranoid-thought-on-banning-abortion-nationwide/" rel="nofollow"&gt;nationwide abortion laws&lt;/a&gt;, or this post on &lt;a href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/26/salerno-standard/" rel="nofollow"&gt;the &lt;i&gt;Salerno &lt;/i&gt;standard&lt;/a&gt;. I don't even mind if you refer to this post, as long as you don't post in it.

In the future, I might try doing an experimental "pro-choice only" thread. We'll see how it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What if you&#8217;re strongly pro-choice but somewhat anti-feminist (in their current manifestation)?</p></blockquote>
<p>Then please don&#8217;t post on this thread again.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that you can always revive one of the past discussions on this subject if you want to post something - for instance, this post on the prospect of <a href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2004/04/22/quick-paranoid-thought-on-banning-abortion-nationwide/" rel="nofollow">nationwide abortion laws</a>, or this post on <a href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2005/07/26/salerno-standard/" rel="nofollow">the <i>Salerno </i>standard</a>. I don&#8217;t even mind if you refer to this post, as long as you don&#8217;t post in it.</p>
<p>In the future, I might try doing an experimental &#8220;pro-choice only&#8221; thread. We&#8217;ll see how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piter</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94172</link>
		<dc:creator>Piter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94172</guid>
		<description>"NOTE: This comments thread is for feminist, pro-feminist, and feminist-friendly posters only. If you suspect you wouldn't fit into Amp's conception of "feminist, pro-feminist, or feminist-friendly," then please don't contribute to the comments following this post."

What if you're strongly pro-choice but somewhat anti-feminist (in their current manifestation)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;NOTE: This comments thread is for feminist, pro-feminist, and feminist-friendly posters only. If you suspect you wouldn&#8217;t fit into Amp&#8217;s conception of &#8220;feminist, pro-feminist, or feminist-friendly,&#8221; then please don&#8217;t contribute to the comments following this post.&#8221;</p>
<p>What if you&#8217;re strongly pro-choice but somewhat anti-feminist (in their current manifestation)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyra</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94169</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94169</guid>
		<description>Ohhh, Goddess.  I'd completely forgotten about the Salemo standard.  And has it ocurred to anybody that under the afore-mentioned standard a state legislature could pass a total abortion ban &lt;i&gt;while Roe is in effect&lt;/i&gt; and legally enforce it until the nearest court manages to take a look at it (yes, they're bound to follow precedent, but they're not exactly quick about these things, are they?); a pro-life judge may deliberately take his own sweet time on the matter; and an anti-choice state government might follow the court schedule closely and have a new, identical ban ready to go into effect by the time the first one is declared unconstitutional?

And Decnavda, I'd imagine it's the presence of zealous anti's, as much as or more than the general cultural climate, that makes clinics necessary.  California, liberal as it may be in many ways, does have them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh, Goddess.  I&#8217;d completely forgotten about the Salemo standard.  And has it ocurred to anybody that under the afore-mentioned standard a state legislature could pass a total abortion ban <i>while Roe is in effect</i> and legally enforce it until the nearest court manages to take a look at it (yes, they&#8217;re bound to follow precedent, but they&#8217;re not exactly quick about these things, are they?); a pro-life judge may deliberately take his own sweet time on the matter; and an anti-choice state government might follow the court schedule closely and have a new, identical ban ready to go into effect by the time the first one is declared unconstitutional?</p>
<p>And Decnavda, I&#8217;d imagine it&#8217;s the presence of zealous anti&#8217;s, as much as or more than the general cultural climate, that makes clinics necessary.  California, liberal as it may be in many ways, does have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gengwall</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94165</link>
		<dc:creator>gengwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94165</guid>
		<description>Amp - I know technically I'm not supposed to post here so delete if you must. I only wanted to comment that Laurence Tribe today in his Altio confirmation testimony seems to agree with your theory:

&lt;blockquote&gt;(As reported on http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/campaignforthecourt/) The court, he said, will not say "Roe v Wade is hereby overruled." The court will "cut back on Roe v. Wade step-by-step . . . to the point where the fundamental underlying right to liberty becomes a hollow shell."&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amp - I know technically I&#8217;m not supposed to post here so delete if you must. I only wanted to comment that Laurence Tribe today in his Altio confirmation testimony seems to agree with your theory:</p>
<blockquote><p>(As reported on <a href="http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/campaignforthecourt/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/campaignforthecourt/</a>) The court, he said, will not say &#8220;Roe v Wade is hereby overruled.&#8221; The court will &#8220;cut back on Roe v. Wade step-by-step . . . to the point where the fundamental underlying right to liberty becomes a hollow shell.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decnavda</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94115</link>
		<dc:creator>Decnavda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94115</guid>
		<description>1.  Depressing post, but Amp is probably right.

2.  How did Tennessee become white?  Isn't that the one state where marital rape is still legal? (I hope I am mistaken about that.)

3.  Slightly off topic, but can someone tall me why abortion clinics are even neccessary in pure-white states?  I recently helped a realitive get an appointment at an abortion clinic in a semi-emergency situation:  She thought she was about two months pregnant, and her personal ethical system / comfort zone would only allow her to use the abortion pill as a method.  She needed a next day appointment.  I thought, "Thank God (or whomever) that we are in San Francisco."  But the nearest next day appointment was in Walnut City - across the Bay Bridge and a hour's drive in what turned out to be a heavy rain.  So why couldn't she just have gone to her regular gynocologist?  Sure, if I still lived in North Carolina, I would completely understand the need for a clinic:  No one there could successfully practice gynocology if it were known they performed abortions.  But is that seriously a concern in San Francisco?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  Depressing post, but Amp is probably right.</p>
<p>2.  How did Tennessee become white?  Isn&#8217;t that the one state where marital rape is still legal? (I hope I am mistaken about that.)</p>
<p>3.  Slightly off topic, but can someone tall me why abortion clinics are even neccessary in pure-white states?  I recently helped a realitive get an appointment at an abortion clinic in a semi-emergency situation:  She thought she was about two months pregnant, and her personal ethical system / comfort zone would only allow her to use the abortion pill as a method.  She needed a next day appointment.  I thought, &#8220;Thank God (or whomever) that we are in San Francisco.&#8221;  But the nearest next day appointment was in Walnut City - across the Bay Bridge and a hour&#8217;s drive in what turned out to be a heavy rain.  So why couldn&#8217;t she just have gone to her regular gynocologist?  Sure, if I still lived in North Carolina, I would completely understand the need for a clinic:  No one there could successfully practice gynocology if it were known they performed abortions.  But is that seriously a concern in San Francisco?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polymath</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94094</link>
		<dc:creator>Polymath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94094</guid>
		<description>along these lines, i have heard (on NPR) that justice ginsberg criticized the roe v. wade decision for precisely that reason:  she presciently saw that a blanket statement upholding a woman's right to an abortion makes it more a matter for federal law than for state law, thus (as you describe) preventing pro-choice states from legalizing abortion on their own.

looks like she was right.  how very disappointing and strange that the very decision upholding the right becomes an instrument for dismantling the right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>along these lines, i have heard (on NPR) that justice ginsberg criticized the roe v. wade decision for precisely that reason:  she presciently saw that a blanket statement upholding a woman&#8217;s right to an abortion makes it more a matter for federal law than for state law, thus (as you describe) preventing pro-choice states from legalizing abortion on their own.</p>
<p>looks like she was right.  how very disappointing and strange that the very decision upholding the right becomes an instrument for dismantling the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonF</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94076</link>
		<dc:creator>RonF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94076</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;[Post deleted by Amp]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>[Post deleted by Amp]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94071</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94071</guid>
		<description>I'm so, so disappointed in Rhode Island.  

But then, Rhode Island politicians are rather famously susceptible to corruption, so perhaps some bribery is in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so, so disappointed in Rhode Island.  </p>
<p>But then, Rhode Island politicians are rather famously susceptible to corruption, so perhaps some bribery is in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acm</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94065</link>
		<dc:creator>acm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94065</guid>
		<description>this is a very depressing post.
not least because I can't say that you're wrong.

the fist closes ever tighter . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a very depressing post.<br />
not least because I can&#8217;t say that you&#8217;re wrong.</p>
<p>the fist closes ever tighter . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-94039</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-94039</guid>
		<description>I think also helpful would be a map like the one you posted detailing current conditions, where a red state would be one with no abortion providers and a pink state would be less than some small number, like 3 or 5.  It would be interesting to see how those two maps compare, because, last I heard, some states had none and other had very few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think also helpful would be a map like the one you posted detailing current conditions, where a red state would be one with no abortion providers and a pink state would be less than some small number, like 3 or 5.  It would be interesting to see how those two maps compare, because, last I heard, some states had none and other had very few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Under no circumstances</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/01/12/the-coming-decimation-of-abortion-rights/#comment-262788</link>
		<dc:creator>Under no circumstances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-262788</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;I believe that every individual's reproductive choices are their own goddam business and I have no interest in talking to people who believe in sticking their bossy little noses up my uterus. So here's a link dump instead. Read them, or don't. Ampersand writes the post I was planning to write NARAL's Women Are Waiting site (Please tell me none of my readers are stupid enough to believe that Plan B is "abortion.") Lies, and the Lying Anti-Choice "Crisis Pregnancy Centers" That Tell Them&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->I believe that every individual&#8217;s reproductive choices are their own goddam business and I have no interest in talking to people who believe in sticking their bossy little noses up my uterus. So here&#8217;s a link dump instead. Read them, or don&#8217;t. Ampersand writes the post I was planning to write NARAL&#8217;s Women Are Waiting site (Please tell me none of my readers are stupid enough to believe that Plan B is &#8220;abortion.&#8221;) Lies, and the Lying Anti-Choice &#8220;Crisis Pregnancy Centers&#8221; That Tell Them<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
