If I’m To Be Given One Label, Call Me An Egalitarian
Since I started speaking out about my rape and rape in general, I’ve been called a man hater, anti-male and a few derogatory labels I won’t repeat here. Yet as I think about why I speak out and blog against rape and other forms of violence and exploitation, hating men isn’t even at the bottom of the list.
What’s number one?
Preventing harm.
In an ideal world no one would be charged with rape because everyone tempted to rape would resist temptation. I know we’ll never reach that ideal world, but we can get closer to it than we are today. Sometimes that means standing up against those who try to block this effort.
So why do some still insist on giving me the label man hater for my effort?
At first I thought they confused my opposition to rape as an opposition to men since men commit most of the rapes. I thought they couldn’t have read much of my blog or they would see that I’m also against the exploitation and rape of men and boys.
Then it clicked. The label has never been about me.
It’s all about them. To define me as a man hater you have to refuse to truly see and value rape victims as full human beings who didn’t deserve what was done to them.
The women who tried to slap that label on me frequently talk about protecting their sons. And if that protection harms girls and women that seems to be an acceptable trade off. Those women who say they are only protecting the men and boys in their family often say they were feminists through college and beyond but finally came to their senses.
These women remind me of parents who fight to get every school levy passed until their last child graduates and who then switch sides to lead the fight against all subsequent school levies.
For these people it is all about them and their self-interests. They were never true to any philosophy about education. Those ex-feminists were never true feminists, they just aligned themselves where they saw potential benefits such as increased pay for women.
Either that or the intrinsic definition some have of what it means to be a man includes a level of violence and self-centeredness I see as criminal.
As a woman, I’ve experienced the harm that comes when men think of girls and women as something less than them. But my concern has never been limited to the harm that I have felt personally or that I am more likely to feel because of my gender. From as early as I can remember, my mother stressed respect for others and that it was wrong to exploit others just because you can.
So the label feminist has too narrow of a scope.
As I read Newsweek: An Inconvenient Woman about Mary Magdalene, the label of egalitarian popped out at me. It spoke to my responsibility not to see myself as inherently superior to anyone else, not even rapists. It means I can’t buy into monster myths.
For those who want to claim superiority, egalitarian is a nasty thing to be. It means you are no better in the eyes of God than the leper and you have no excuse for exploiting people you see as inferior.
This stratification of humanity relates to the view held by some in the Church that Eve caused Adam to sin just as rape victims caused their rapists to lose control. To me this ignores the lesson I learned from the story of Eve, Adam and the apple. And that is that passing the buck for the actions you take is as old as humanity. God didn’t like it then and I doubt God approves of it now.
In my comment on Alas: Gender Does NOT Trump Race, I wrote:
The view that any type of oppression/discrimination/hatred trumps another forgets that they are all symptoms of the same problem. And that problem is exploiting groupings of people for our self-interests and then using those same groups as scapegoats.
This underlying system harms even those who aren’t oppressed/discriminated against or hated because it creates a toxic environment.
Unfortunately, many see this toxicity as being caused by those who don’t quietly let the toxic system hurt them by staying in their proper place.
Many who want to deny racism/sexism/etc are likely scared that the unjust system will turn on them. The last thing they want is to be treated the way they treat those they discriminate against.
We tend to think others mirror our way of thinking so from the emotion put into attacking those who fight against sexism and sexual violence, anti-feminists must be afraid that feminists want to turn the tables on men.
They may feel that violence-against-women legislation does just that, but there’s a huge difference between making those who hurt others — with little risk of punishment — accountable for their actions and switching who can victimize without fear of punishment.
So if I’m an egalitarian, why aren’t I as vocal in all the areas where people are harmed or discriminated against? It’s very simple, I’m at zero degrees of separation when it comes to rape and the ripple effects of rape. In other areas, I can be supportive but I don’t have the same level of experience and insight.
It would be like an alien trying to communicate how to walk from Los Angeles to New York City without getting a closer look at the Earth than what astronauts can see from the moon. Hey, from up there, the Earth looks like a perfect globe and all you have to do is follow a curved line. That alien would probably grumble that humans don’t know how to follow even the simplest of instructions.
My view is often closer than the moon analogy, but I could easily say things as hurtful and as ignorant as many people say about the impact of rape.
Also posted on my blog, | Posted by Abyss2hope in Anti-feminists and their pals, Feminism, sexism, etc, Rape, intimate violence, & related issues | 8 Comments »
Announcement: Progressive Bloggers Forum and Male Pro-Feminists Forum
I should have published this ages ago, but I spaced.
There’s now a new, private forum for progressive bloggers, and also for progressive members of the “progressive blogosphere” community (i.e., comment-writers). It’s called Progressive Bloggers Kicking Ass Forum. It’s intended as a sort of support group, where we prog blog types can share info, advice, supportive vibes, experiences, bitching about trolls, and general high-fiving.
There’s also a sub-forum, moderated by me, for men only - specifically, pro-feminist and feminist men. This is a forum for men to discuss ideas, thoughts and issues pertaining to men and feminism. I don’t know exactly what it’ll be yet; hopefully we’ll discover that as we go along. But it is intended to be a space for discussion without personal attacks.
Men who want to participate should first join PBKA (which requires moderator approval), and once your membership is activated click “usergroups” on the top bar. Then, on the next screen, choose pro-feminist and feminist men forum from the pull down menu, then follow the directions to join!
Although as the moderator I’m most focused on the pro-fem men group, I want to point out that the forum also includes sub-forums for feminist women only, for women of color only, and for white anti-racists only. If you’re interested in any of that, or in progressive blogging in general, please come join us.
What feminist book would you have 12-18 year olds read?
From the “Alas” mailbag…
hi,
I’m looking for a book recommendation, and i wonder if you or a blog reader could help (though please don’t give out my e-mail address).
I’m a teacher at a jr. high/high school. A recent incident at the school exposed what i thought was a serious need to start a dialog about sexism at the school among our students and possibly our faculty. We are a fairly liberally oriented group, but i think a lot of our kids dont see how sexism affects their lives. And i think the faculty is sometimes passively sexist without meaning to be. so i floated the idea of a discussion group among the faculty about sexism and sexuality, and i got a pretty strong response. now I’m looking for a book i can suggest we all read to give us a basis for further discussion and action.
The ideal book would be something like the practical modern feminists guide to navigating the pre-teen and teen years.
We need ideas about teaching 12-18 year olds (boys and girls) about the effects of sexism, a positive and responsible attitude about their sexuality (without seeming preachy or coercive or censoring), skills for critically analyzing media portrayals of sex and sexism, and other important things like that.
I don’t know how often you take requests like this, but if it seems worthwhile, id appreciate a request to your readers for a recommendation.
Readers? Anyone got a recommendation for this nice teacher?
Help Out My Neighbors
If you can spare five or ten bucks right now (or more!), a couple of people in what I think of as my blogging neighborhood could use help.
First, the Count - husband of the Countess, aka Trish Wilson - finds himself unexpectedly jobless. Trish is one of the leading debunkers of anti-feminist nonsense in all Blogistan, and has kept at it year after year. I’m a fan of her work. But right now Trish needs our help, to rescue her and her Count from a fate worse than death:
Anyone who can help us will forever be on our good side. Thanks so much if you’re able to throw some moulah our way. We really need it. Otherwise, we have to live with my mother, and listen to Christian radio, hear “Praise the Lord” when she finds a good parking space, and listen to The Cowsills on an old console record player. Please Don’t Let Us Have To Live Like That!!!!
The Countess and her Count have job prospects and future plans; but they’ve had the rug yanked out from under them, and they need help getting through the next little while. If you can, head on over and use the Paypal link at the top of The Countess’ page.
And then head over to Slant Truth and use the “help Vegankid & Friends” button on the upper right (you can also follow the links there to read more about the scary stuff Vegankid has been dealing with lately) to send VK exactly one dollar.
VeganKid is one of those “lynchpin people” you meet sometimes - people who just seem to naturally draw a network of people around them, and to turn that into something vital. You know, like George in “It’s a Wonderful Life” or someone like that. This is, of course, an excellent reason for me to nurture a burning hatred of VK, since I’ve never been anything like that.
Nonetheless, VeganKid has been sick, and one of VK’s housemates suffered a major, major traumatic burning (follow the links at Kevin’s place for details). As Kevin says, right now I’m sure VeganKid would appreciate some help. To be specific, a buck of help - the link automatically fills in the amount for one dollar, no more, no less. It would be really cool if a couple of hundred people PayPal’d a single dollar, don’t you think?
Male Privilege Checklist: Harassment, Car Sales, Housecleaning, and Weight
“Chuckdarwin,” while criticizing the Male Privilege Checklist, wrote:
5. The odds of my encountering sexual harassment on the job are so low as to be negligible.
Anecdotal. Unprovable. As a manager, I have fired people for sexually harassing men at work.
I looked into this after reading Chuck’s post, and I think he has a point. #5 is too strongly worded; in the US, according to Federal EEOC statistics, the proportion of sexual harassment charges filed by women has dropped from about 90% to about 85% over the last decade. Therefore, I’ve rewritten #5 to say “I am far less likely to face sexual harassment at work than my female co-workers are.”
27. If I buy a new car, chances are I’ll be offered a better price than a woman buying the same car.
Salesmen just want your money, no matter who you are. While it may still happen in rare cases, this is just neurotic tinfoil hattery and an unimportant concern in the grand scheme of women’s issues.
That this happens - and doesn’t appear to be a matter of “rare cases” - has been documented by sending male and female negotiators, trained to use identical negotiating techniques, to car lots to negotiate for cars. The initial offers made to men are simply better. (This doesn’t mean that women will always pay more, just that they’ll have to negotiate harder to reach the same price.) (References at bottom of post).
Admittedly, the academic research I’ve read only applies to the US. However, a November 2005 story in The Guardian reported that a non-academic British study had found similar results.
What Car? magazine sent men and women into 45 dealerships across England, and used hidden cameras and microphones to track their progress.
The team found the women were quoted up to £1,800 more to buy a BMW 320i, Ford Focus 1.6, Nissan X-Trail 2.2 dCi, Vauxhall Corsa 1.2 and Volkswagen Beetle Cabriolet 1.6. On average they were asked to pay a premium of £534. [That's $1,005 U.S. -Amp]
Less than half the staff were happy to cut prices for female customers, compared with more than four-fifths for men.
More women thought their inquiry had not been taken seriously by the dealer, and complained that finance packages had not been explained. Even the presence of a man appeared to cut prices, with couples offered a better deal even if the woman took the lead.
In general, the theory that the free market prevents market-based discrimination from happening - “Salesmen just want your money, no matter who you are,” as Chuck puts it - has not been supported by the experiences of discriminated-against groups, or by empirical testing.
37. If I have a wife or girlfriend, chances are we’ll divide up household chores so that she does most of the labor, and in particular the most repetitive and unrewarding tasks.
This one is just plain old insulting.
#37 is well-supported by tons of research, from a large number of countries (I’ve included a handful of citations at the bottom of this post). Women do more household chores, and in particular are more likely to scrub the toilet, wash dishes, change the diapers, etc - tasks that must be repeated again and again, day after day.
I don’t see why any man should find this insulting. Some men do as much or more housework than the women they live with (I live with such a man), but statistically these men are a minority; why be insulted because I point this fact out?
41. I am not expected to spend my entire life 20-40 pounds underweight.
Come on, now. This is all based on ‘target weight’, which is in no way an exact science (and that’s as nice as I can be about the ’subject’). No one EXPECTS any woman to be 40 pounds underweight. Some famous models and actresses may try this, but most people actually say it’s a BAD thing (reading the tabloids whilst in line to purchase groceries).
41. Probably I could have phrased this better - in particular, including a particular poundage was a mistake. So point well taken. I’ll have to reword this item.
But I feel that Chuck is focusing on the trees and ignoring the forest. Is there any serious doubt that women as a group face much more pressure than men to be thin?
(This is one of a number of posts responding to Chuck’s critique. You can use the category archive to see all posts related to the Male Privilege Checklist.)
References
Read the rest of this entry »
Men Are Much Less Likely To Be Victims of Rape
On the Male Privilege Checklist (henceforth “the list,”) I wrote:
7. If I’m a teen or adult, and if I can stay out of prison, my odds of being raped are so low as to be negligible.
Karmaq, writing in The Unseen Kid’s comments, responded:
I question some of the stats… For example, the myth that rape only happens to men in prison (or gay men), when the FBI stats (if you want to believe the FBI) are that it happens way more often than we think. No one wants to talk about and even if they do, no one wants to hear about it. But I’ve met enough men (straight, never been in jail) who have talked to me about it (cause people tend to tell me stuff they don’t normally share) that I tend to suspect the FBI’s “1 in 7 men; 1 in 3or4 women” had some validity.
My response to Karmaq:
First, Karmaq is mistaken about what the FBI’s statistics say. The FBI only counts the small proportion of rapes that are reported to police, and they calculate their numbers per year, rather than per lifetime. As a result, the FBI’s numbers are far, far, far lower than the numbers you provide here. Most importantly, because the FBI’s inexcusably sexist definition of rape excludes men (”forcible rape, as defined in the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, is the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will”), the FBI’s numbers are irrelevant to Karmaq’s point.
Second, contrary to Karmaq’s remarks, I never claimed that “rape happens only to men in prison (or gay men).” That would obviously not be true.
What I said is, that for men who aren’t in prison, the chances of being raped are very low, and I stand by that claim.
According to this study by the Centers for Disease Control, 15% of women and 2% of men in the US have ever been raped in their lifetime. That difference alone is enough to justify my statement. (The CDC’s numbers are based on interviews with a representative sample of the US population, not on police reports.)
Although the CDC’s is one of the best rape prevalence studies, I believe their results underestimate the prevalence of rape, especially for women. One particularly striking (but not at all unusual, as these studies go) flaw of the CDC’s survey is that their interview questions didn’t include a specific question asking about rapes that take place while the victims are unconscious or otherwise unable to resist due to drink or drugs - which is to say, a prototypical frat-house rape. Of course, anyone can be raped while passed out, but anecdotally I believe it happens significantly more often to women. (Unfortunately, I haven’t seen any good studies addressing this question, so anecdotal evidence is all I have.)
Readers may be wondering, of that 2% of men who report having been raped, how many were raped in prison? The CDC did not ask if rapes took place while incarcerated, so there’s no way of knowing what portion of the 2% of raped men, were raped in prison. However, it’s at least plausible that a significant portion of that 2% represents prison rape.
According to this Bureau of Justice Statistics report, 5% of US men have been in prison at some point in their lives. If one in ten men are raped while in prison - and some studies suggest prison rape prevalence may be that high or much higher - that would account for a quarter of all the male rape victims in the US. So although this is speculative, it’s plausible that a substantial number of the 2% of American men who have been raped, were raped while in prison.
Does it matter where rape takes place or who the victims are? In every moral sense, it does not matter. No one deserves to be raped. Prison rape is rape, and is totally inexcusable. Rape is rape, evil and wrong no matter where or to whom it happens. Every rape victim deserves sympathy and support.
But one point of the male privilege checklist is to make visible some ways a male-centric society harms women. (I believe that male-centric societies also harm men, but that’s a subject for a different post). Pretending that there’s no statistical difference in the likelihood of being raped goes against that purpose. In that context, that rape in ordinary US society is a crime overwhelmingly committed by men against women is important, and must be acknowledged.
It should be noted that the prison rape epidemic is probably going to get worse. Over the next couple of decades, the proportion of male rape victims may increase, because the proportion of men who have been in prison is projected to skyrocket. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ projections, if our current rate of sending men to prison is maintained, then at some point in the future 15% of American men will have spent time in prison. (6% of white men, 17% of Latinos, and 32% of Black men. For comparison’s sake, the projections for women are 1%, 2% and 6%.)
If those projections are true (or even partly true), and if the prison rape epidemic continues unabated, the overall number of American rape victims will vastly increase over the coming decades. This is true even if rape prevalence outside of prison doesn’t change at all. This is one reason why it’s essential to support strong measures to combat prison rape; unfortunately, all that’s gotten through congress so far are weak half-measures.
* * *Please Note* * *
My posts on “Alas” are sometimes heavily moderated. If you’d like to avoid that, you can instead leave a comment on the identical post at Creative Destruction.
"Alas" Posts In This Series
The Problem With Picking A Preferred Victimization
In the comments of my post, False Allegation Worse Than Rape? cross-posted to Alas Ed wrote:
Would you rather be raped or incarcerated for 1, 10, or 20 years. Maybe I am a freak but I will take a rape, ESPECIALLY the I am too drunk to remember kind, over giving up years of my life. No hesitation, no second thoughts.
Okay, I’ll take your choice and run with it. Since rape by it’s definition is beyond the rape victim’s control, I’ll create a full scenario from that to show how this “easy” choice may not be something that’s over and done with in one night.
Since many rapes happen on college campuses, our fictional raped man is a senior who has landed his perfect job and his perfect fiance. He’s at a party where he bumps into a girl he dated his freshman year. He broke up with her when he discovered that she was into drugs, porn and sleeping around. This night she hands him a Coke (he gave up drinking alcohol at the same time this relationship ended) and tells him that she’s turned her life around and because he once cared for her, he sips his drink and listens to her financial plans even though he wishes he could be anywhere else.
The smoke and the noise start getting to him and he tells this girl that it was good seeing her, but it’s time for him to go since he has a big test in the morning. She tells him that she’s ready to leave also, but the walk to her dorm takes her through an area where a girl was raped the month before. Because he’s a gentleman, he reluctantly agrees to see her safely to the entrance of her dorm.
The girl waves at those around them and tells them she’s being seen safely home so they don’t have to worry about her. A few people wink suggestively, but our man needs fresh air too much to correct anyone’s impression about his intentions.
The next morning, our man wakes up naked in a strange bed. He’s in a dorm room and it isn’t his. He sits up and feels like he’s going to puke. As he rushes to get dressed and get to his class which he’s already late for, he nearly trips over a tripod.
By the time he gets his supplies from his dorm room and gets to the class where his big test has already started, he’s so waxen that the professor suggests he go to the infirmary. He doesn’t and instead somehow makes it back to his dorm room and collapses.
The next morning he’s fine and he soon takes that exam and he just knows he aced it. Friday night, he and his fiance have a romantic encounter and everything is once again as it should be.
The end?
Not so fast. This man was raped, remember.
A few days later, a group of students he doesn’t know well point at him. He hears something about him being movie star material. His fiance has told him more than once that he has the looks to be a model, but looks aren’t what matter to him. Still, he gets a little ego boost.
The day after that, his fiance has her best friend return his engagement ring. He tries to contact her, but is told to stop stalking her.
A week later, his favorite professor stops calling on him.
A month after he walked his ex-girlfriend home, a representative from the perfect employer who made a written job offer, tells him that his job offer is being withdrawn. The person says something about a background and credit check. He immediately goes online and requests his credit report, but it is still pristine. His name isn’t uncommon so maybe his future employer has mistaken someone else for him.
He goes online and searches for his name and finds it listed on his ex-girlfriend’s web site. To see what she’s written about him he would have to pay since she has a fee-based members-only section. Adults only.
He vaguely remembers her saying that she was paying her way through college by designing and maintaining web sites, but this isn’t what he envisioned. He wants to know what’s linked to his name, but he doesn’t want to pay to find out.
He talks to several friends and the ones who, like him, stay focused on the goal of building a stable future don’t have a clue. But a friend he parted ways with around the same time he broke up with this old girlfriend, winks and calls him a real stud. Feeling nearly as sickly as the night he walked his old girlfriend home, he waits while this old friend turns on his computer.
Far too soon he sees what happened that night. And he looks like a willing participant in the making of porn. The woman keeps her face averted so his identity is the only one that is unquestionable.
Without having to think about it twice he says, “She must have slipped drugs into my Coke. This was rape.”
The other man laughs. “Yeah, that’s your story and you’re sticking to it.”
Within hours it seems like everyone on campus starts calling him, “Raped Man.”
He goes to the campus police and the officer tells him that’s what you get when you do drugs or go binge drinking. The man then asks if he at least had enough common sense to use protection.
He hadn’t even thought about STDs. With his ex-girlfriend’s drug habit, she could very possibly be HIV positive. He gets tested, but he’s told he needs to be retested for HIV even if this test comes back negative.
He scrounges together enough money to pay for an attorney without talking to his parents. The attorney sends a letter demanding that the video be removed immediately. A letter is sent to his lawyer saying he signed a consent form. He remembers signing a form his freshman year when she wanted to submit his portrait to a competition. The lawyer asks him how he could be so stupid.
The rest of his senior year doesn’t get any better and college becomes an endurance event. He contacts other employers who offered him a job, but they tell them the position he was offered has already been filled. Six months after graduation, he finds a job but it pays far less than the position he lost. He saves every extra dollar and has a new lawyer make an offer to have the video removed. A ridiculous counter offer is made but he feels he has no choice so he pays it.
He gets involved with his local church and finds a safe place. He avoids talking about his college experience. Two years after he was raped, he has another HIV test taken and to his relief, it comes back negative. He then asks the woman he loves to marry him and hopes she will never learn about the video. He doesn’t even think about telling her what happened to him.
As they build a family, he prays that video never surfaces again.
This sort of scenario could happen to a college woman. Even the refusal by so many people to see her as a real rape victim. Only a woman might get far enough in the process to be identified by many as someone who made a false allegation of rape.
The scariest part is my fear of posting this scenario since some will try to use it to minimize the impact of rape on women. “See, men can get raped too so stop talking about gender violence. If we can endure it without legal recourse, you can too.”
Also posted on my blog, | Posted by Abyss2hope in Feminism, sexism, etc, Rape, intimate violence, & related issues | 38 Comments »
Monday baby blogging: Hand Holding Babies, O My!
No time to write anything right now, so here’s a couple of cute pictures instead. Kim took these pics; I’m told the hand-holding was Sydney’s idea.

I really like the above image as a photo - I like the interplay of colors and patterns, and the big horozontal lines of the hands and arms really hold the picture together.
False Allegation Worse Than Rape?
Rape is a truly terrible act. There is not much worse than rape, but this article details something that might be. An unnamed fifteen year old girl reported to police that a Connecticut cab driver tried to rape her but she escaped.
This man’s acknowledgement that rape is a terrible act is undermined by the facts of the false rape case (that might be worse than rape) as reported by WFSB:
“The reason she ran off was she didn’t want to pay the cab fare,” Moscato said. “But on the other side, here’s an officer and you see someone running, screaming. We have to act quickly, because (what if) we have someone who is a predator out there?”
The incident happened on May 8 and the charges were dropped on Tuesday May 23. Despite the rhetoric being tossed out by those who think most accused rapists are the real victims, this case highlights that law enforcement doesn’t blindly take the accuser’s word as fact.
As someone who has been raped (more than once) and falsely accused of a crime (only one time) both were highly stressful, but being raped was the far greater violation. People who try to put false allegations (including all allegations where the person charged claimed it was consensual and which couldn’t be proved or disproved) on the same level as acknowledged rapes are in fact trying to minimize the crime of rape.
In a comment on my post about the women’s Duke lacrosse team’s plan to wear bracelets that say innocent, crossposted on Alas, Nyk writes:
I’m sorry, but being a woman [rape victim] does not give you a special right not to face peer pressure. If you have to stand up for what’s right, you have to do it, man or woman, and if you don’t do it, you are personally at fault for that. Not anyone else. You. This is a lesson I learned in a very difficult way, but in the end, it is still true. Those who desire a perfectly “fair” world are destined for unhappiness, because life is not fair even at its best, let alone at its worst.
What I find so interesting about this comment is:
1) Women rape victims are at fault if they crumple when besieged by pressure from their peers, with no distinction between true peer pressure and illegal attempts to subvert justice. It assumes that rape is not traumatic enough to interfere with resisting whatever your peers throw at you. Any weakness is the victim’s fault and not a consequence of the trauma of rape.
2) I’ve seen no similar commands directed at those who say they have been falsely accused of rape. None of the personal responsibility crowd is telling them that they should stop expecting life to be “fair” and that if they can’t handle being seen as possible rapists, it’s their own fault. Those who refuse to believe certain rape charges instead paint the alleged rapists as tragic heroes victimized by unfair justice systems and evil women. They’ve looked into these men’s hearts and know they would never commit rape. Any evidence against them must be false.
3) It is extremely pessimistic. It also ignores the fact that only the most privileged always expect to get what’s perfectly fair. I’ve found that those who have been spoiled with “perfect fairness” have the most trouble when they end up on the wrong side of the fairness/unfairness scale. And if they can’t have perfect fairness, nobody else should expect fairness, not even rape victims.
Many of those who support alleged rapists skip “not fair” or “peer pressure” and go right to “witch hunt” or “lynch mob.” Since both of those latter phrases describe actions where people get murdered, alleged rapists are to be seen as potentially greater victims than women who are raped.
I guess it’s my problem that I don’t accept this unquestionable truth.
Also posted on my blog, | Posted by Abyss2hope in Anti-feminists and their pals, Feminism, sexism, etc, Rape, intimate violence, & related issues | 99 Comments »
In Defense Of Generalizations and “Petty” Complaints
There’s a new round of discussion of the “Male Privilege Checklist” going on, mostly on Livejournals. Usually I don’t respond to these criticisms, because usually the folks who write them are too far on the insulting and smug side.
But this time, for some reason, I found myself responding. Naturally a couple of my responses were rejected by Livejournal for being too long, and I thought “might as well put this stuff on Alas.”
ChuckDarwin (who seems to be a Kos-style leftist) posted his critique of the Male Privilege Checklist on two livejournals, here and here. I include both links because I’ll be referring not only to Chuck’s post, but also to comments left by readers in each livejournal.
Chuck writes:
This list is full of rash generalizations and woefully short on anything resembling facts, statistics or evidence. Some of the entries are patently true and hard to argue against. Other things on the list are simply untrue, unprovable, or completely based on anecdotal ‘evidence’. Some of the issues the author (B Deutsch, whomever that is) chooses to focus on are, in my opinion, embarrassingly petty and do more harm than good to the whole cause.
Regarding the lack of cites and evidence, point well taken. I’ve often thought that I should go through and add citations and the like for most of the items on the list, which would make the piece much stronger. But the staggering amount of work required - and the book-length blog post that would result - have intimidated me.
So my new plan is to gradually respond to critiques like Chuck’s, when they show up and when I feel like it :-), and to link each item on the list to the relevant responses I’ve written.
In my defense, the list isn’t intended as an argument to persuade skeptics. I do a lot of evidence-based argumentation in my other writings, as my regular readers know. But the list is not an argument that’s going to persuade anyone who isn’t already sympathetic to my view. Instead, the list is intended as a tool for feminists and people learning about feminism; a way to make visible some ways living in a male-centric society helps men and harms women, by compressing into an extremely compact form much of the research, essays and women’s writings I’ve read over the years. The list is probably read most often in college classes and on my blog - contexts in which readers will have had read enough background material to judge for themselves how fact-based and reasonable the list’s claims are.
1. Generalizations
Regarding generalizations, I reject Chuck’s contention that generalizations are necessarily bad. (I know he qualified “generalizations” with “rash,” but since he doesn’t support that description with a logical argument it seems like hand-waving). It’s true that some men get raped, for example, and on an individual level that’s 100% as awful and hideous as when women get raped. But should that prevent me from pointing out that in day-to-day life, women in general have much more reason to fear being raped than men in general?
There is almost no inequality that happens 100% to women and 0% to men. Or 100% to blacks and 0% to whites, for that matter, and so on for any other disadvantaged group imaginable. But that some inequalities generally happen more to women than to men (to the disabled than to the ablebodied, to American Indians than to whites, and so on) is something that serious people can legitimately discuss and be concerned with. Contrariwise, if we are unable to generalize, then we will be unable to discuss patterns of discrimination at all.
2. The Pettiness Charge
Further down in comments, Chuck expanded on the “pettiness” charge, writing:
We have women on this planet with REAL PROBLEMS and we’re going to fill our list with entries about our clothes and our weight issues?
Women in Iran are being sold into prostitution as children and then hanged for ‘promiscuous behaviour’… and the author of this list is going to concentrate on how long it takes to put on makeup. Shouldn’t the women with all the money and freedom the world has to offer (even if that money and freedom is fractionally less than that of their male counterparts) be trying to help the millions (billions?) of downtrodden women in China and Africa? [...]
I think that, instead of focusing on little gripes (some of these 43 things are quite little comparatively), everyone needs to pull together to make sure that North Dakota and the new SCOTUS don’t overturn Roe v Wade.
2a. Not An Either-Or Choice
My reflexive response is to point out that Chuck’s implication - that because I wrote about issues he considers “petty” in a single document, I therefore don’t spend time on “real problems” - is ridiculous. It’s not an either-or choice. I compiled that list, and since then I’ve written thousands of posts on hundreds of issues, and I’ve volunteered, and I’ve given money.
Offhand, I can think of two large national US organizations whose politics are devoted entirely to reproductive rights (NARAL and Planned Parenthood), and four national feminist organizations that spend a lot of time working for reproductive rights (NOW, Feminist Majority, Emily’s List, Legal Momentum). There are probably lots more. But I can’t think of one comparable feminist organization which has given similar attention to the makeup issue, and I bet Chuck can’t either. So what is the basis of Chuck’s complaint? That if anyone, ever, in any instance, mentions a issue he has judged “petty,” that’s too much?
But that reflexive response of mine, while correct in pointing out the gross unfairness of Chuck’s assumptions, concedes too much to Chuck’s argument.
2b. The unreasonable double-standard
Chuck’s standards are unreasonable. Is there anyone who ignores all local issues so long as, somewhere in the world, someone is suffering worse? Pretty much anyone who isn’t concentrating full-time on the genocide and mass rapes going on in Darfur can legitimately be said to be using their time on something other than the most immediately pressing issue in the world today.
(Every time I see this critique of feminists, I’m struck by what hypocrites the critics are. I’ve never seen a “how dare feminists write about makeup” critic whose own writings didn’t include some less than earth-shaking concerns. Chuck, for example, has recently posted about the etymology of “y’all” and about what’s on the telly (he’s pissed that American Idol is so popular, and I can’t blame him). Since Chuck doesn’t write exclusively about immediate life-or-death matters, why does he think it’s fair to hold me to that standard?)
Not only is it an inevitable human condition that most people are interested in analyzing what happens in their daily lives, it’s probably a good thing. A feminist movement that considers day-to-day sexism too petty to ever discuss would be ivory-tower and snobby. A well-rounded feminism - like a well-rounded life - should include many concerns and many approaches. The demand that we ignore “petty” local issues is a demand that we stop acting like human beings.
2c. Who decides what is “petty”?
Why does Chuck imagine he has the perspective to declare what is and isn’t important? Chuck thinks weight is a petty issue, but I doubt the parents of anorexia patients would agree. If a woman spends her entire life feeling inadequate and wrong because of her weight, that’s not Rwanda, but neither is it nothing. Makeup seems less like a petty issue when you consider that women have been fired from their jobs for not wearing it. And so on. Similar responses could be made for most of the other issues Chuck considers “petty.”
My favorite example of Chuck’s parochial view of “petty” is when he dismisses the wage gap as whiny first world women being paid “fractionally less.” It’s so easy for someone whose sex or race places them on the happy side of the wage gap to say that; but I bet if Chuck got a 5% or 10% or 20% pay cut, he might find that “fractional” amounts matter.
Even seemingly small problems can build up over time, and cause significant distress. A small wage gap can build up to enormous amounts of money over many paychecks; the endless social pressure to put on unwanted makeup or heels or to cover up or to expose can, for some women, build up into significant sources of stress and distress. Do these issues bother everybody? No. But they harm some people, and are therefore worth discussing.
2d. The so-called “petty” issues and “important” issues are interconnected.
Finally, Chuck is assuming a clear separation between “petty” and important that is not always clear in real life. In Chuck’s comments, Rougewench did a wonderful job discussing this question:
But you know, saying that women in Western culture have it “so much better” than the downtrodden women in China and Africa does not mean that we do not still deal with what remains of gender based discrimination still endemic to Western culture. Making that argument is literally saying, “you should be happy with what your getting because at least you are not being whipped or sold into prostitution or forced to wear a Burqua, or gangraped and given AIDS, etc.”, even though the various things listed do limit perceptions, behavior and choices for women in this culture.
None of it, at any level, is alright. [...]
It is worth noting that the endemic sexism in western culture, the conglomeration of all those seemingly little things, is what allows us to be in a place where Roe v. Wade is in danger of being overturned.
Zing, pow - totally on target. (And in comments, Chuck seems to concede that Rougewench may be right). One of the most important - perhaps the most important - trait of a male-privileged society is that in such a society, boys and men are the norm, and male lives are the default. This is visible in many seemingly harmless things, such as the language that we use (chairman, mailman, “he” and “man” as generics, etc), the overwhelming predominance of male characters in children’s entertainment, and the expectation that women take on husband’s last names.
I think the view of male lives as the default is harmful in and of itself. But it’s also harmful because it is the context which supports many other harms - such as the ongoing attacks on reproductive rights, the wage gap, and the high prevalence of rape.
But he’s right about one thing
There is one legitimate critique Chuck touches on; the list is extremely US-centric. (I’ve been trying to decide if it’s white-centric, as well; so far I don’t think it is, but I may be missing something important). I don’t think that it’s wrong for Americans to write individual works which focus on US society, but I should have acknowledged the US-centrism in the introduction. I’ve corrected this error in the current version of the list.
Finally, I’d be remiss not to plug Tekanji’s excellent post Debunking The Myth of Frivolity, which covers many of the same issues I discuss here from a feminist pop-culutre critic’s perspective.
UPDATE: And check out this terrific related post by Amanda at Pandagon, too.
UPDATE 2: And this related post by Chris at Pandagon, too, too.
(Chuck also criticized several specific items on the list; I’ll address those criticisms in upcoming posts. I’ve created a Male Privilege Checklist category to make it easier for anyone interested to locate list-related posts).
* * *PLEASE NOTE* * *
I sometimes heavily moderate discussion threads on “Alas.” If you’d like to avoid this, you can post a comment on the identical post on Creative Destruction.
Alleged Police Abuse Caught On Tape
Lisa Tanner was cited on March 24, 2005, for playing music too loud at her house and was arrested for drunk and disorderly conduct. Lisa says she asked for a breathalyzer test and was refused. She was banging on a window. Police say she was “a possible danger to herself.” Inside her cell, she was ordered to get on both knees. When she refused, four officers entered the cell and tied her down in a device called a “pro-straint” chair.
This case may not be an isolated incident since other people treated in the same way might not have had the connections or the resources to hold the police accountable that are available to a woman whose father is a prosecutor.
From what I read about this case, it like so many others, seems to be a procedural and training problem rather than a case of rogue officers. That makes it more problematic since the situation won’t be resolved by disciplining or firing police officers.
What makes it even more serious is that improper restraint by multiple officers can lead to cutting off the restrained person’s airway. To a poorly trained officer, the person’s frantic struggle to breathe may be seen as violence and result in more pressure being applied.
That’s a deadly combination. And one that puts those who are trying to uphold the law and our justice system at risk of becoming scapegoats for problems they didn’t purposely get involved in.
As my other posts related to police/authority abuse or misconduct show, abusive and unethical treatment have a greater scope than any one agency or police force:
Ethics and the defense attorney who represents alleged rapists
Ethical interrogations and the rape victim
Abu Ghraib dog handler gets 6 months for refusing to be “soft and cuddly”
Also posted on my blog, | Posted by Abyss2hope in Whatever | 7 Comments »
Update on the New Zealand Police Rape Case
When I stopped guest blogging Amp kindly said that I could post any further updates about the police rape case that I had been writing about. There hasn’t actually been a major development in the police rape case, but some information that had previously been suppressed is now able to be talked about.
For those of you who don’t know what I’m talking about I wrote a summary a couple of months ago. The short version is that one of New Zealand’s assistant police commissioners* stood trial for rape, alongside two of his former police buddies. They were found not guilty after a three week trial where it was sometimes hard to figure out who the media thought the defendent was (it was called the ‘Louise Nicholas trial’ - even though trials are usually named after the defendents).
I knew, I think a lot New Zealanders knew, that there was more than one accusation of rape against these men. That they were basically using their badges (and their batons) to rape and abuse women with impunity.
There is still a lot of suppressed information in this trial, including information that the jury isn’t allowed to know. Immediately after the verdict some of this suppressed information was posted on my blog. I was then told then that there weren’t just more accusations; there were going to be more trials. That there was a real possibility that the breaches of suppression orders could lead to the judge throwing out the charges against these men, on the grounds they couldn’t get a fair trial.
I took down information breaking the suppression order on my blog, and on Alas. I believed that any woman who wanted to try and get justice through the court system deserved that right. While I believed that the information I had published would not prevent a fair trial - the judge might.
The fact that there were more trials was also suppressed, and I was told that even mentioning future trials could lead to the rapists’ lawyers arguing that Bob Schollum, Brad Shipton and Clint Rickards weren’t going to be able to get a fair trial (I never did understand that argument, presumably the jury would know there was another trial - because they were at it). So I couldn’t even explain why I was taking the information down.
Now part of the suppression order has been lifted and so I was able to say that they are going to stand trial for at least one more set of sex charges. I don’t know if it’s just the one more trial, there could be more than that. I don’t know how many women these men raped, but I do know that it’ll be less than the number of rapes that they’re charged with.
There are a number of women who have fought to take on the entire police system and expose a systematic culture of rape and abuse. The police officers who were investiagting their complaints were mates of the men who raped them. Finally, two decades after the fact, some of these cases are coming to trial. That the woman whose case is going to be heard next is prepared to proceed, even after watching how Louise Nicholas was treated is a testimony to her strength.
* Policing is centralised in New Zealand, so this is sort of the equivalent of the Deputy Commissioner of the FBI being charged with multiple counts of rape.
Note this thread is for feminists and pro-feminists only.
Submit Your Posts To The Third Big Fat Carnival
Congress Votes To Bar Protests at Military Funerals
Under the Senate bill, approved without objection by the House with no recorded vote, the “Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes Act” would bar protests within 300 feet of the entrance of a cemetery and within 150 feet of a road into the cemetery from 60 minutes before to 60 minutes after a funeral. Those violating the act would face up to a $100,000 fine and up to a year in prison.
If I’m understanding the bill correctly, it only covers national cemetaries.
What I find telling and disturbing is that this same disgusting behavior by the same group occured at the funerals for those who died of AIDS and at the funeral of murder victim Matthew Shepard, but no law was passed to stop this group’s hate speech until they started targeting heroic victims.
To me there is a clear difference between free speech and harrassment of individuals and this group has a long history of engaging in a pattern of harrassment. If this law and others like it only protect certain funerals, they should be thrown out because the law is based on why protesters are there (merit of the victim) and not on what they are doing.
Also posted on my blog, abyss2hope.blogspot.com
Women’s Duke Lacrosse Team - Why Not Wear a Bracelet That Says: Justice for All?
At Feministing: More. Duke. Crap. Samhita opposes the decision by the women’s Duke lacrosse team to wear bracelets that say innocent in a game against Northwestern.
The team members could have avoided having their decision attacked if they’d chosen a different slogan such as Justice for All. Isn’t that what we are all supposed to want? It doesn’t bash anybody and doesn’t label any innocent person as a liar.
In the comments Hujo wrote: Stop scapegoating on the patriarch trip and just take control of your own life!
Keeping control of our own lives is what those opposed to rape and gender violence are working towards. But following Hujo’s order would make rape victims feel they are the only one’s responsible for their rape.
Been there, done that. Eventually realized that it was my rapist who refused to take personal responsibility and who used me as a scapegoat for his actions.
Ain’t it funny how those who insist the loudest that others must take personal responsibility are usually trying to dodge responsibility for their actions or their words or their failure to act?
The same people who keep saying “real” rape is horrific seem puzzled that anyone would be angry toward those who rape and those who say the rights of accused rapists should trump the rights of alleged rape victims. They refuse to understand why any sensible person would be angry when alleged rape victims are vilified while alleged rapists are placed on a pedestal?
As for why shows of solidarity in support of accused rapists is problematic, see my earlier post:
Peer pressure led rape victim to drop charges, Tecumseh police say
The intent may be to see that there is justice for all, but the reality is that these shows of solidarity perpetuate environments that are hostile to rape victims and which lead to victims refusing to cooperate with law enforcement. Then if those rape victims are raped again, they are called proven liars by the same type of people who treated them horribly the first time.
Also posted on my blog, abyss2hope.blogspot.com
Do Black Women Earn More Than White Women?
Some time during all of the time that the Duke rape scandal first erupted there was an interesting exchange in the comments section on my blog. A reader linked to this article, which includes the following quote:
Black and Asian women with bachelor’s degrees earn more money than similarly educated white women, and white men with four-year degrees still make more money than anyone else.
My immediate reaction was, no Black women don’t earn more than White women; where does this data come from? So I decided to go to the Census data and see what it revealed. Sure enough the 2004 Census reveals similar numbers, but I was still convinced that something was wrong with this picture. Then it hit me. What this measure does is compare all college educated men and women whether they are in the labor force full time, part time, or not at all. Are college educated Black women really faring better than their White female counterparts in the labor force? The answer is no. In fact, this is a great example of how statistics can be misread and or misleading.
In order to understand what is wrong with using this measure it is important to think about the idea of statistical controls. These figures did not control for the woman’s involvement in the work force. A slightly better comparison would be to look at people who are of similar education, and a similar labor force status. So I decided to look at only those college educated workers who were in the labor force full time year round. When you compare similarly situated women and the gap between White women and Black women reverses, so White women in this position are earning more. The table also shows that this holds true for those women with a high school education.
So what is going here? The explanation is actually simple. White women are more likely to be out of the labor force or in the labor force part time. This is largely because White women are frequently married to White men, who are the highest earners. White men’s much higher incomes make it feasible for White women to be less connected to the labor force, compared to Black women.
Another interesting thing to note about these charts is the position of Black men. College educated Black men earn more than all women, including White women, but they earn less than Asian, Latino, and White men. However, this pattern does not hold true for Black men with high school or less. Less educated White women earn more than less educated Black men.
Lately, I have heard several recent discussions insinuating that Black men are in a better economic position that White women; however, I think overall White women tend to be in a better financial position than Black men. I say this because the data in the two charts above reflects personal income. The vast majority of people do not live alone…they live in households or families.. The Census Bureau defines households and families as two different sets of living arrangements. Here is a quote:
Household A household includes all the people who occupy a housing unit as their usual place of residence. Family A group of two or more people who reside together and who are related by birth, marriage, or adoption.
Since the majority of Black men are married to or living with Black women and the vast majority of White women are married to or living with White men, their living situations are probably best measured by looking at household or family measures as the two tables on the right do. The first table looks at family incomes for both single mother households and married households, and it is not disaggregated by education.
The next table covers households. In this table I looked a four person households, and only those household where the head of household had a college degree or higher. It is evident from these tables that Black and Latinos fair particularly poorly compared to their Asian and White counterparts. While individual income is useful at gauging discrimination against individuals in the labor force, it is not as useful when examining the actually living conditions of people. The only people who this measure would be applicable to is people who live alone (this group is growing, but even many single people have roommates or others they share homes with
So let me get back to the main point here……Black women are not fairing as well as White women when it comes to their financial situation, and this difference cannot be explained away by the higher rate of single parenthood or lower level of education. When Black women and White women have similar levels of education and a similar position in the labor force (full-time, part time, or unemployed ), White women earn more (I actually did look up income for unemployed women, and unemployed White women do have more income coming in.). Unfortunately, the AP report mentioned in the beginning of this article failed to take account of the fact that many college educated White women are working part time or are taking time out of the work force, especially if they have a White male partner who is a high earner. This case is a prime example of how statistics can be misleading. Many people who read that article are probably convinced that Black women are truly fairing better in the job market than White women, but it is not so.
(Sorry that the graphs are so ugly….I’m having a hell of a time learning this program.) If you want to look up data on income, the following link has the data used in these graphs.
This is also posted at my blog Rachel’s Tavern.
Link Farm & Open Thread #26
Seems like it’s been a while since I’ve done one of these….
Ally Work: The First Erase Racism Carnival is Here!
Our own guest-poster Rachel S. (of Rachel’s Tavern) did a great job putting this together.
Lucky White Girl: Carnival of the Liberals #13
Linky Liberal Goodness!
New Blog: Taking Place
A really good groupblog with a lot of the smarter set of progressive bloggers.
GenderGeek: Arguments in Favor of Outlawing Prostitution
Specifically, she favors arresting and jailing “johns,” which is my position too. Here she rebuts several oft-heard feminist arguments against this policy.
Shrub.com: Rebuttal to the “It’s Just a Joke, You Shouldn’t Take It Seriously” Argument
Another example of first-class argumentation from the awesome Tekanji.
A Womb of Her Own: Anne Fasuto-Sterling on How Culture Literally Shapes Our Bones
Blac(k)ademic: More on gender and race intersectionality, rather than trumping
Damn, but Nubian is great. Complexity is not our enemy.
Citizen of the Month: What being Jewish Has To Do With Understanding Anti-Fat Bigotry
Pseudo-Adrienne: Book Review of The Girls Who Went Away
The book is about “The Hidden History of Women Who Surrendered Children for Adoption in the Decades Before Roe v. Wade.” Really interesting stuff.
Debatage: Peter Singer Comes Out In Favor of Anti-Fat Bigotry
Vegankid: The Root of Racism is the Creation of Whiteness
After all, if we are all given the same opportunities in life and the outcome is that White people come out ahead, then the logical conclusion is that we remain innately superior. Inversely, this logic implies that people of color do not attain such positions because they are lazy, morally corrupt, intellectually inferior, or other such nonsense.
BlackProf.com: Race and Sexual Harassment
Chelsea Jennings: The LGBT Rights Movement and the Civil Rights Movement Are Not The Same
Civil rights metaphors are an even bigger joke when we consider the disenfranchisement of blacks within the LGBT community. Co-opting language and tactics from the civil rights movement without coming through on its promises is self-serving and undermines our movement instead of legitimizing it.
Daily Kos: Why The Right-Wing Gets It
Regular readers know I don’t link to Kos much - I’m not that interested in horserace analysis. But this post, about how the right uses long-term thinking to move the boundaries of debate, struck me as both interesting and probably true. This is one reason I think it’s important to fight and argue for total marriage equality for same-sex couples, rather than just arguing for a “civil unions” compromise.
Ostroy Report: Lots of posts about Al Gore’s hypothetical run for president
I like the post-2000 Gore’s politics a lot better than most Democrat’s, and he could probably win. The problem is, when he was actually faced with a challenge in Florida in 2000, he pretty much rolled over and died, providing zero leadership and not standing up for black voters’ rights. Do we really want someone like that in the White House?
Feministe: Piny on Cultural Appropriation, Borrowing and Theft
Thoughtful post. The discussion in the comments is interesting, too.
luxurious living light: Bought Colored Kids (a critique of transracial adoption).
Curtsy: Blac(k)ademic
The Debate Link: Why the Religious Right is Distancing Itself From Republicans
It’s strategy. Pure speculation on David’s part, but interesting and plausible speculation nonetheless.
Molly Saves The Day: Is “My Name Is Earl” a Hidden Recruitment Drive for Scientology?
I don’t really care if it is or not; it’s a good show no matter what it’s intent and inspiration. But it’s an interesting post nonetheless.
After Ellen: The Coming Extinction Of Lesbian Characters on Network TV
Why Am I Not Surprised?: Racism = Prejudice + Power
…They say, “I don’t see color. I just see everyone as a human being,” by which they mean, they don’t intend to acknowledge all the studies showing how exploited and dominated people of color still are in the United States because the White speaker has already decided that Black people’s problems are the result of Black people’s inferiority.
Hugo Schwyzer: Feminist Men and Women’s Anger
The Gimp Parade: Fallacious and Offensive Comparison between Fetuses and the Disabled
Blue correctly criticizes a discussion had by a number of ablebodied clueless people, myself included, I’m embarrassed to admit.
BlackProf.com: First African-American Women To Be A Professor At Yale Law School
Pinko Feminist Hellcat: Don’t Mess With Our Views, Plebes!
Wind turbines are too unsafe and environmentally destructive to put in sight of Ted Kennedy’s estate. But move the turbines to a poor area, and suddenly the safety and environmental problems disappear like poof!
Pinko Feminist Hellcat: Critique of the Voluntary Simplicity Movement
BRO Blog: Two Upcoming Anti-Queer Ballot Measures In Oregon
Really horrifying stuff - one would ban all public schools, including universities, from teaching any materials that “express approval of, endorse or otherwise make morally acceptable the behaviors of homosexuality, bisexuality or transgendered conduct.” Hopefully, it won’t pass, but I bet that the majority of conservatives in Oregon vote in favor of it.
Noli Irritare Leones: Beefcake, Cheesecake, and the Meaning of Women’s Lack of Surfing for Porn
Curtsy: Hugo.
BBC Video: BBC Interviews Wrong Man (aka Guy Goma is my hero)
Guy Goma, a cab driver, is sitting in the BBC waiting room, waiting to interview for some job. Somehow, he wound up in the interview seat of a news show instead, mistaken by the show staff for an expert in internet copyright law. Mr. Goma’s expression when he realizes he’s being interviewed on TV news - and his decision to bluff his way through the interview - is hilarious, but also the bravest thing I’ve seen in ages. I’d hire him. Curtsy: The Debate Link.
Democracy Arsenal: On A Unilateral Withdrawal From the West Bank by Israel
VeganKid: Its four in the morning and i reek of burnt flesh and melted linoleum.
The reality of U.S. health care, where people have to choose between emergency care and having money for rent the next month.
Feministe: The Patriachy Hurts Men Between The Sheets
Because y’know, it’s not feminism that says it’s all about the erection.
After Ellen: Interview with WonderFalls co-creator Bryan Fuller
One of my favorite TV shows ever - too bad they canceled it after three episodes. The interview focuses on the main character’s lebsian sister, and includes a little of what they planned to do with her character second season. Sigh.
Mombian: New Report on Children’s TV Watching Habits
Pandagon: Against “Natural vs Unnatural” Discourse
A response to to one of Rachel’s posts here on Alas. Yay for debate!
Feministing: Zimbabwe women arrested for protesting inequitable schools
BlackProf.com: Why The Census Should Not Have An “Interracial” Category
Given the importance of racial statistics for addressing racial inequality, it does not seem such an imposition to request that individuals treat the race question as an inquiry into the political meaning of how they are racially perceived, rather than an inquiry into the full range of a person’s racial identity. … When a mixed-race person of African-descent can’t get a taxi, the full range of how that person culturally identifies is simply not salient to the issue of discrimination.
Capitalism Bad, Tree Pretty: Excellent Post on Food, Politics, and Capitalism
Big Fat Blog: Study Finds Anti-Fat Prejudice Common Among Fat People
Can’t say I’m surprised.
Capitalism Bad, Tree Pretty: How Imprecise Langauge Hinders Feminist Debates About Pornography
(Liberal) Girl Next Door: Start Preparing For Republicans To Steal The 2006 Elections
I love these “movie trailers” parodies made from classic movies.
Curtsy: Headpiece for the Staff of Ra
Debitage: Nature Is Not Wise, But We Are Foolish
John M. Burt: Saipan is a Beautiful Place
Possibly no “guest workers” in any part of the US (Saipan is a US territory) have been mistreated as badly as women working in Saipan. John Burt provides some useful links.
Balkinization: On the FBI Search of Rep. Jefferson’s Office
Instead of being upset about the President spying on Americans without a warrant, and in violation of federal law, the members of the U.S. Congress are upset about the FBI searching a Congressman’s office with a legal warrant. Instead of being upset about the cruel, inhuman and degrading tactics of the CIA and military interrogators, members of the U.S. Congress are upset that a corrupt Congressman’s office has been disturbed.
National Council of Research on Women: Taxes Are a Women’s Issue
Sex Assault Suspect Kills Family, Self
A man standing trial on sexual assault charges apparently killed his wife, their two children and himself hours before he was to testify Thursday, authorities said.
When I posted earlier today on my blog about who people would blame if a rape suspect committed murder in response to being charged, I didn’t think I’d find such a case this soon.
The responsibility for this crime belongs to the one who committed it, not to his alleged victims.
Also posted on my blog, | Posted by Abyss2hope in Feminism, sexism, etc, Rape, intimate violence, & related issues | 2 Comments »
Pepsi: Our Good Will Ambassador
I’ve made “Alas” a hundred pixels wider than it was - I hope that won’t be a problem for many folks. If it’s a big problem, let me know.
From Daniel Fireside, writing in Dollars and Sense magazine:
In an effort to shore up the United States’ international image, Karen Hughes, Bush confidante and Public Relations Czarina, has hit on a new strategy to boost global goodwill: when all else fails, send in the CEOs. According to the Wall Street Journal, Hughes has … convinced PepsiCo head Steve Reinemund to visit Guatemala in the wake of Hurricane Stan.

Not a great cartoon, but I think the drawing is pretty good.
Wis. Governor Signs Abstinence Bill
Sex education teachers must present abstinence as the preferred behavior for unmarried people under a bill signed Tuesday by Gov. Jim Doyle. The legislation means teachers must emphasize that refraining from sex before marriage is the most effective way to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.
I’m waiting for the bill that requires education on sexual ethics including what is and is not legal sexual behavior. The closest I ever came to that type of talk was during a greek mythology class when the teacher let the discussion between students stray into who can have sex, when and with whom. Most boys believed they were under no obligation to wait, but their bride should be a virgin on their wedding night. One boy delighted in mocking that double standard.
Before that all I got was a gym teacher in junior high school breaking the rules to explain what the sex organs were and how they functioned.
Too often the traditional abstinence message turns teen sexuality into a hockey game where the girl is the goalie who is told she must protect her goal (virginity) at all times. The boys meanwhile are encouraged, either explicitly or implicitly, to try to get past the girl’s defenses.
If you buy into that analogy, it makes perfect sense to ask, “What was she wearing?” and to blame the girl for failing to stop a boy from scoring. It also makes many acquaintance rapes just part of the game because the girl or woman let her defenses down. Rape charges are then like a bad call from a ref who wasn’t anywhere near the game you were playing.
But healthy sexuality is not a competitive sport where you must have winners and losers.
Also posted on my blog, | Posted by Abyss2hope in Feminism, sexism, etc, Gender and the Body | 77 Comments »
