« Conservatives Slander Feminists and Whitewash Harms To Iraqi Women

Home
Monday Baby Blogging: We’re All On Vacation »

Debt Collecting Thugs & Small Claims Courts Gang Up On The Poor

Posted by Ampersand | July 31st, 2006

Sheelzebub emails that “The Boston Globe is doing a spotlight report on the abusive practices of debt collectors, which includes seizing the property of people who have already paid their debts.”

One thing I found particularly outrageous, if true, is that some small-claim courts have in effect given up their role as neutral adjudicator, and instead act to rubber-stamp dubious or even blatantly false claims by debt collecting companies. Check out Sheelzebub’s post on Pinko Feminist Hellcat for more information.

| This entry was posted by Ampersand and is filed under Economics and the like. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “Debt Collecting Thugs & Small Claims Courts Gang Up On The Poor”

  1. Sheelzebub Writes:
    July 31st, 2006 at 10:31 am

    Thanks for the link!

    This comment was written by Sheelzebub.
    Report this comment to the moderators
  2. Lee Writes:
    July 31st, 2006 at 11:07 am

    Wow, this is awful. I thought that you had to prove delivery of summons to be able to pull this stuff. And this is appears to me in some ways to be related to how the courts treat old people without families in some jurisdictions, where random attorneys can show up in court and through some maneuvering end up with the keys to the bank accounts and other assets. Is it too difficult to fix this stuff up with legislation?

    This comment was written by Lee.
    Report this comment to the moderators
  3. Sailorman Writes:
    July 31st, 2006 at 11:46 am

    There IS legislation, it’s not being followed. Not that this is an excuse.

    The problem here is really the judges, who are shirking their judicial responsibilities. Small claims is really a court of equity, which makes it even more appalling. These judges should not be allowed to serve–though that’s extremely hard to accomplish.

    This comment was written by Sailorman.
    Report this comment to the moderators
  4. feminist blogs Writes:
    July 31st, 2006 at 5:42 pm

    have in effect given up their role as neutral adjudicator, and instead act to rubber-stamp dubious or even blatantly false claims by debt collecting companies. Check out Sheelzebub’s post on Pinko Feminist Hellcat for more information. posted 1:26 pm at Alas, a blog

    This comment was written by feminist blogs.
    Report this comment to the moderators
  5. Danny Writes:
    January 7th, 2009 at 11:07 am

    nrm5V2YJEFf6Z

    This comment was written by Danny.
    Report this comment to the moderators
  6. RonF Writes:
    January 7th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    Too many times these courts are places to stow judges who shouldn’t be judges but who have friends in high places or who really don’t care about doing their jobs right.

    This comment was written by RonF.
    Report this comment to the moderators

Leave a Reply

If you have questions about the moderation policies here, please read this post. Short version: treat other posters with respect.

If your submitted comment fails to appear, without even an error or "waiting for moderation" message, then our spam-blocking software may have blocked your comment. Please contact the moderators immediately so we can rescue your comment. If this happens repeatedly, you might visit Akismet's comment form to tell them they're falsely identifying you as a spammer.

Markup Controls