<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ironic Unintended Effects Of Electing Judges By District In Oregon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: How I&#8217;m Voting This Election Cycle: Oregon Ballot Measures &#171; Creative Destruction</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-198441</link>
		<dc:creator>How I&#8217;m Voting This Election Cycle: Oregon Ballot Measures &#171; Creative Destruction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 05:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-198441</guid>
		<description>[...] No on Measure 40 - Elect Oregon Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Judges by district. I&#8217;ve written about this one before, although it&#8217;s measure number has changed since then. I&#8217;m voting against this: Judges enforce laws for the entire state, not for their own districts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No on Measure 40 - Elect Oregon Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Judges by district. I&#8217;ve written about this one before, although it&#8217;s measure number has changed since then. I&#8217;m voting against this: Judges enforce laws for the entire state, not for their own districts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How I&#8217;m Voting This Election Cycle: Oregon Ballot Measures</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-198397</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas, a blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How I&#8217;m Voting This Election Cycle: Oregon Ballot Measures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 22:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-198397</guid>
		<description>[...] No on Measure 40 - Elect Oregon Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Judges by district. I&#8217;ve written about this one before, although it&#8217;s measure number has changed since then. I&#8217;m voting against this: Judges enforce laws for the entire state, not for their own districts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No on Measure 40 - Elect Oregon Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Judges by district. I&#8217;ve written about this one before, although it&#8217;s measure number has changed since then. I&#8217;m voting against this: Judges enforce laws for the entire state, not for their own districts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Bog</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-168374</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Bog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 11:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-168374</guid>
		<description>Is that measure number right?

This almost passed the last time we voted on it.  It has a nice ring to it.  But ultimately, it's a dumb idea, reinforcing the awful idea that judges have political "constituencies," rather than being neutral arbitrators.  We already have two failed politiical branches in Oregon state government -- we don't need a third.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that measure number right?</p>
<p>This almost passed the last time we voted on it.  It has a nice ring to it.  But ultimately, it&#8217;s a dumb idea, reinforcing the awful idea that judges have political &#8220;constituencies,&#8221; rather than being neutral arbitrators.  We already have two failed politiical branches in Oregon state government &#8212; we don&#8217;t need a third.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-168358</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 10:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-168358</guid>
		<description>Well, dominated by Portlanders and sub-urban metro area dwellers, which is very different.

Looking over their bios, the current judges are associated with:

Douglas County (Southern Oregon)
Marion County (Salem)
Portland 
Eugene and Portland
Portland
Portland
Portland

Also, equating Eastern Oregon and rural Oregon is a mistake. Most rural and small town Oregonians do &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; live in Eastern Oregon, they live in the Willamette Valley or along the coast.

But yes, it would probably elect both more progressive judges and more reactionary judges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, dominated by Portlanders and sub-urban metro area dwellers, which is very different.</p>
<p>Looking over their bios, the current judges are associated with:</p>
<p>Douglas County (Southern Oregon)<br />
Marion County (Salem)<br />
Portland<br />
Eugene and Portland<br />
Portland<br />
Portland<br />
Portland</p>
<p>Also, equating Eastern Oregon and rural Oregon is a mistake. Most rural and small town Oregonians do <i>not</i> live in Eastern Oregon, they live in the Willamette Valley or along the coast.</p>
<p>But yes, it would probably elect both more progressive judges and more reactionary judges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sideshow August 2006 Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-264767</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sideshow August 2006 Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-264767</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;DLC's control.) That said, Nathan agrees that, "victory is better than defeat, and Lamont seems like a good guy who will be more progressive than Lieberman." And, like Nathan, what thrills me is the idea of Bernie Sanders in the Senate. Ampersand says Measure 24 on changing how Oregon's Supreme Court is elected is win-win on presentation: So if you want Eastern Oregon to have guaranteed representation on Oregon's highest Court, vote for Measure 24. And if you want to guarantee that the Court will always be&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->DLC&#8217;s control.) That said, Nathan agrees that, &#8220;victory is better than defeat, and Lamont seems like a good guy who will be more progressive than Lieberman.&#8221; And, like Nathan, what thrills me is the idea of Bernie Sanders in the Senate. Ampersand says Measure 24 on changing how Oregon&#8217;s Supreme Court is elected is win-win on presentation: So if you want Eastern Oregon to have guaranteed representation on Oregon&#8217;s highest Court, vote for Measure 24. And if you want to guarantee that the Court will always be<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feminist blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-264768</link>
		<dc:creator>feminist blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/08/06/the-ironic-unintended-effects-of-electing-judges-by-district-in-oregon/#comment-264768</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;s highest Court, vote for Measure 24. And if you want to guarantee that the Court will always be dominated by Portlanders… vote for Measure 24.  Curtsy: Blue Oregon.  (Crossposted on Creative Destruction, where the moderation is lighter.)    posted 4:26 am at Alas, a blog &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->s highest Court, vote for Measure 24. And if you want to guarantee that the Court will always be dominated by Portlanders… vote for Measure 24.  Curtsy: Blue Oregon.  (Crossposted on Creative Destruction, where the moderation is lighter.)    posted 4:26 am at Alas, a blog <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
