I didn’t hate Garden State
| September 26th, 2006I’m sorry, I didn’t hate Zack Braff’s movie Garden State. It was sweet and wistful and funny. Sure, it wasn’t The Greatest Movie Of All Time, but it certainly didn’t deserve a heaping double-scoop of contempt from Slate.
The Slate article has good laugh lines, but some of its criticisms are bewildering:
Braff also uses pop songs as a cheat, an easy way to heighten the emotional impact of otherwise unremarkable moments. The music in Garden State is so load-bearing that the movie becomes ridiculous if you swap in different tunes—if you don’t believe me, check this out.
The link leads to a YouTube video in which whatever sensitive alt-rock piece was originally in a scene from Garden State is swapped with a hip-hop song. It reminds me of Mad Libs - yes, it’s funny, but it’s not a meaningful criticism. We’ve demonstrated that swapping a song chosen to match the emotional tenor of the scene with one chosen to conflict with it changes the scene. Big deal.
I’m also bewildered by the claim that using music to successfully convey meaning and emotion to the audience is bad.
The Slate critic - who praises Braff’s sit-com Scrubs - is of the “how dare you have artistic ambitions - don’t you know your place?” school of thought:
Instead of focusing on the one thing he’s good at, Braff is quitting Scrubs after this season to focus on his film career. His rumored upcoming projects reveal two possible career paths. The first: the leading role in a Fletch remake. The second: starring in, writing, directing, and producing a remake of a Danish Dogme film about a woman whose husband gets paralyzed in a car accident. Please, Zach, leave paralysis to Lars von Trier. Chevy Chase—now there’s a guy you should look up to.
Yes, because what the world really needs is a Fletch remake, rather than someone attempting to do something that has ambitions of being good.
In the comments of Pandagon, “The J Train” calls Natalie Portman’s character in Garden State a “vagina ex machina” character, which she defines as “the beautiful, together, inexplicably single woman who just seems to fall out of the sky in front of the protagonist. See also Kirsten Dunst, Elizabethtown.”1That, I think, is a much more on-target criticism than grousing about a movie director incorporating pop music he loves into his film. The Portman character was embarrassing, not so much a character as a girlfriend-shaped blob pulled out of a prop closet so that Braff had something to play his romance scenes against. Portman was aggressively cute! cute! cute! all movie long, but Braff’s script didn’t give her much to play. (And although it’s too long since I’ve seen it for me to be sure, I don’t think Garden State passes the Mo Movie Measure either).
Finally, it’s annoying that Braff — who owes his career to the willingness of producers to cast someone without cookie-cutter movie-star looks — didn’t show a similar daring when he cast the parts in Garden State. Maybe he’ll improve in his future movies.
[Crossposted at Creative Destruction. Right now, the comments on "Alas" are broken, so today is a good day to leave comments at Creative Destruction.]
- There are also penis ex machinas - see the veterinarian character on Gray’s Anatomy, for instance. (back)
September 27th, 2006 at 4:57 am
t The Greatest Movie Of All Time, but it certainly didn’t deserve a heaping double-scoop of contempt from Slate. The Slate article has good laugh lines, but some of its criticisms are bewildering: Braff also uses pop songs […] Continue reading at Alas, a blog … posted 8:25 pm at Alas, a blog
This comment was written by feminist blogs.Report this comment to the moderators
September 28th, 2006 at 6:34 am
Alas, a blog » I didnât hate Garden State
This comment was written by Utopia, dystopia, frytopia..Report this comment to the moderators
September 28th, 2006 at 3:59 pm
I’ve been told that “Mo Movie Measure” is a misnomer, since it was stated by a different character before the character Mo was introduced.
This comment was written by eavan.Report this comment to the moderators
September 28th, 2006 at 6:54 pm
the “Interiors” route of Woody Allen, using no music, and making an unwatchable film, he didn’t. He chose to use music to turn the film inward, to show an exterior landscape, but to allow the viewer to hear the interior landscape. My adored Ampersand comments on the Pandagon post and notes: In the comments of Pandagon, “The J Train” calls Natalie Portman’s character in Garden State a “vagina ex machina” character, which she defines as “the beautiful, together, inexplicably single woman who just seems to fall out of
This comment was written by My Amusement Park.Report this comment to the moderators
September 28th, 2006 at 8:21 pm
Ha, with everyone talking about how they hated Garden State even though everyone else loved it, I felt terribly confused for liking it.
Garden State does pass the test, whatever it’s rightfully called, because Sam and her mother have several conversations with each other.
This comment was written by nerdlet.Report this comment to the moderators
September 28th, 2006 at 8:32 pm
Yeah, it was sweet and wistful and funny, and then it had a lot of scenes about disability. The helmet and epilepsy stuff, the disabled mother who is the source of all his problems, her easy off-camera death, and the long-running “I really thought you were retarded” joked. I was interested and touched except for the snappy dialogue with the tiresome “retarded” jokes.
This comment was written by Blue.Report this comment to the moderators
September 29th, 2006 at 7:19 am
I don’t think that’s what’s being claimed.
Yes, changing the music changes the tone of the scene. In Say Anything…, the classic boombox scene originally featured a Fishbone song before they switched over to Peter Gabriel’s “In Your Eyes,” and that does affect the tone of the scene - but even the Fishbone song works, albeit slightly differently. It’s *part* of the scene, not the only thing.
Compare that to the scene in the YouTube video. There really doesn’t seem to be *anything* other than the particular song, and that’s why the switch is so absurd.
Compare that also to the recent trend of concluding television episodes with montages set to popular songs. (Though Lost exploited this to comic effect when they cut the music off abruptly when the batteries in Hurley’s CD player died. I don’t recall if they’ve ever done a pop-song montage since.)
You say these things like they’re mutually exclusive.
This comment was written by jfpbookworm.Report this comment to the moderators
October 2nd, 2006 at 2:32 pm
[...] El of My Amusement Park agrees with me that it’s silly to criticize Garden State for using music to convey emotion: If you are a filmmaker (or editor or music supervisor) and you have a weaker scene, or even just a scene that could be vastly improved by a masterful choice of music, your job is to put kickass music behind that scene. Duh. Music is one of a filmmaker’s tools.[…] [...]
This comment was written by Alas, a blog » Blog Archive » Counterpoint: In Defense of “Garden State”.Report this comment to the moderators
March 27th, 2007 at 11:50 am
[...] 3 Alas, a blog » Blog Archive » I didn’t hate Garden State Pingback on Sep 27th, 2006 at 11:44 am « The levels of delusional self-congratulation got so high, by the end of the meal they were praising themselves for the super-human feat of finishing a bowl of pho A little late on this, huh? » Posting Your Comment Please Wait [...]
This comment was written by Ah, romance at Pandagon.Report this comment to the moderators