<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Fat Bias In Medical School</title>
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s not our fat asses that is the problem so much as our fat heads at Pandagon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-266695</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s not our fat asses that is the problem so much as our fat heads at Pandagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-266695</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Fat is regarded as a moral issue in our society. Alas, a blog has a great post written by a med student about the anti-fat bias in medical schools. Its a depressing and sobering read, but also nothing any fat person wouldn&#8217;t have already been well aware of. Fat stigmatization has completely failed the health and well being of fat and not-fat people alike. One can only hope that the sun will soon set on this cultural imperative. The well-being of everyone is in the balance. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[&#8230;] Fat is regarded as a moral issue in our society. Alas, a blog has a great post written by a med student about the anti-fat bias in medical schools. Its a depressing and sobering read, but also nothing any fat person wouldn&#8217;t have already been well aware of. Fat stigmatization has completely failed the health and well being of fat and not-fat people alike. One can only hope that the sun will soon set on this cultural imperative. The well-being of everyone is in the balance. [&#8230;]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpy realist</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-232450</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpy realist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-232450</guid>
		<description>1. I think there's a heck of a lot we don't know about the body.  The consensus is right now that obesity is a "marker" for diabetes.    We still don't know how all this fits together with exercise habits, trans-fat, corn syrup, environment, the phase of the moon, etc., etc., and so forth. 

2. Obesity can be the marker for other things as well. (And Orange, yah, hope you find a better doctor.  How many instances of classic thyroidal symptoms do you have to list before they listen?)

3. Exercise with fun stuff like belly dance and hiking and eat reasonable amounts of delicious food.  Life is too short to eat crap.  Works for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I think there&#8217;s a heck of a lot we don&#8217;t know about the body.  The consensus is right now that obesity is a &#8220;marker&#8221; for diabetes.    We still don&#8217;t know how all this fits together with exercise habits, trans-fat, corn syrup, environment, the phase of the moon, etc., etc., and so forth. </p>
<p>2. Obesity can be the marker for other things as well. (And Orange, yah, hope you find a better doctor.  How many instances of classic thyroidal symptoms do you have to list before they listen?)</p>
<p>3. Exercise with fun stuff like belly dance and hiking and eat reasonable amounts of delicious food.  Life is too short to eat crap.  Works for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medstudent</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-232444</link>
		<dc:creator>medstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-232444</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m not aware of any reputable doctor/nutritionist who would suggest a caloric intake more than 500 calories below your BMR.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
&lt;blockquote&gt;all epidemiologists and medical professionals know that you cannot always compare directly between different countries and indeed it is unscientific to do so.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My point, in the examples in the original post, was that the teaching about obesity in medical school is rife with unsupported facts, and that evidence-based medicine goes out the window when we are talking about the evils of being fat. Whether or not you believe that a reputable medical professional would say these things is irrelevant: they were explicitly taught, in lecture, to my medical school class. These attitudes, I believe, are part of the reasons why fat people are so marginalized by physicians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m not aware of any reputable doctor/nutritionist who would suggest a caloric intake more than 500 calories below your BMR.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>all epidemiologists and medical professionals know that you cannot always compare directly between different countries and indeed it is unscientific to do so.</p></blockquote>
<p>My point, in the examples in the original post, was that the teaching about obesity in medical school is rife with unsupported facts, and that evidence-based medicine goes out the window when we are talking about the evils of being fat. Whether or not you believe that a reputable medical professional would say these things is irrelevant: they were explicitly taught, in lecture, to my medical school class. These attitudes, I believe, are part of the reasons why fat people are so marginalized by physicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariella Drake</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-231428</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariella Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-231428</guid>
		<description>jon said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Let me respond to a few strawmen

“. Or lecturers who tell us that 1200 kCal per day is a reasonable weight-loss diet to recommend to patients”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh, given we're talking about a medstudent talking about their own lecturers, and given I have encountered medical professionals who recommend this level of calorie intake as reasonable, I'm not sure strawman means what you think it means. Whether or not you believe doctors who advocate this are 'quacks' doesn't change that there are a sizeable number of doctors who *do* advocate this, and many of them, wait for it, went to medical school. Which indicates that perhaps it's not so unbelievable that there are lecturers in medical schools who are teaching that this is reasonable.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve not heard before that excess GH leads to obesity or that obesity is a symptom of acromegaly. So no, its not a symptom, nor is extreme hunger for that matter.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You've not heard of it before, so it's not true? Are you really stooping to that level, considering I'm not seeing your medical credentials? Obviously the reports of people with these conditions is completely irrelevant. Not to mention that the human body has a tendency to, well, do wacky things. 

Of course, what you're missing is that there *are* conditions where obesity is a symptom. PCOS is one that hasn't been mentioned, but many of the women I know who have it start by going to the doctor about no or infrequent periods, and got met with the dismissal that it was because they were overweight, even if they'd maintained the same size for some time and the period problem was more recent. 

That such conditions are rare doesn't make them not worth considering. If anything, if one wants to quickly get back to telling one's patient how fat and horrible they are, they should be the first things to rule out, since the quicker you do that, the quicker you can go back to being an insulting ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jon said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Let me respond to a few strawmen</p>
<p>“. Or lecturers who tell us that 1200 kCal per day is a reasonable weight-loss diet to recommend to patients”</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh, given we&#8217;re talking about a medstudent talking about their own lecturers, and given I have encountered medical professionals who recommend this level of calorie intake as reasonable, I&#8217;m not sure strawman means what you think it means. Whether or not you believe doctors who advocate this are &#8216;quacks&#8217; doesn&#8217;t change that there are a sizeable number of doctors who *do* advocate this, and many of them, wait for it, went to medical school. Which indicates that perhaps it&#8217;s not so unbelievable that there are lecturers in medical schools who are teaching that this is reasonable.</p>
<blockquote><p>I’ve not heard before that excess GH leads to obesity or that obesity is a symptom of acromegaly. So no, its not a symptom, nor is extreme hunger for that matter.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;ve not heard of it before, so it&#8217;s not true? Are you really stooping to that level, considering I&#8217;m not seeing your medical credentials? Obviously the reports of people with these conditions is completely irrelevant. Not to mention that the human body has a tendency to, well, do wacky things. </p>
<p>Of course, what you&#8217;re missing is that there *are* conditions where obesity is a symptom. PCOS is one that hasn&#8217;t been mentioned, but many of the women I know who have it start by going to the doctor about no or infrequent periods, and got met with the dismissal that it was because they were overweight, even if they&#8217;d maintained the same size for some time and the period problem was more recent. </p>
<p>That such conditions are rare doesn&#8217;t make them not worth considering. If anything, if one wants to quickly get back to telling one&#8217;s patient how fat and horrible they are, they should be the first things to rule out, since the quicker you do that, the quicker you can go back to being an insulting ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-224971</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-224971</guid>
		<description>Something else worth adding --- statistically, the probability that obesity is due to glandular disorders is very rare. Cushing's disease, for instance, has an incidence rate or 10 per million. Hypothyroidism is more common, but it has many other symptoms. And it rarely leads to weight gain more than 10 lbs or so. 

For the vast majority of obese people, its lack of exercise and caloric excess  that leads to obesity. That was the case for me !! 

Yes, one generally needs a genetic predisposition to be obese. But thats irrelevant. Nature is not going to give you a pass  just because you drew a gene that gave you this disposition and more than you get a pass on the harmful effects of blood pressure just because you inherited a genetic tendency to get high BP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something else worth adding &#8212; statistically, the probability that obesity is due to glandular disorders is very rare. Cushing&#8217;s disease, for instance, has an incidence rate or 10 per million. Hypothyroidism is more common, but it has many other symptoms. And it rarely leads to weight gain more than 10 lbs or so. </p>
<p>For the vast majority of obese people, its lack of exercise and caloric excess  that leads to obesity. That was the case for me !! </p>
<p>Yes, one generally needs a genetic predisposition to be obese. But thats irrelevant. Nature is not going to give you a pass  just because you drew a gene that gave you this disposition and more than you get a pass on the harmful effects of blood pressure just because you inherited a genetic tendency to get high BP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-224968</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-224968</guid>
		<description>Doctors should indeed evaluate all symptoms of their patients. Unexplained weight gain or weight loss should be an alarm bell.   However,  weight gain or  hunger during pregnancy would not normally be considered unusual. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;
If every physician I’ve ever had hadn’t viewed the weight as the primary problem, instead of a possible symptom (in the process completely disbelieving my reports), it’s possible I could have been diagnosed a decade ago
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I've not heard before that excess GH leads to obesity or that obesity is a symptom of acromegaly. So no, its not a symptom, nor is extreme hunger for that matter.

Unfortunately most GPs  rarely deal with very rare conditions such as acromegaly so the doctors probably missed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doctors should indeed evaluate all symptoms of their patients. Unexplained weight gain or weight loss should be an alarm bell.   However,  weight gain or  hunger during pregnancy would not normally be considered unusual. </p>
<blockquote><p>
If every physician I’ve ever had hadn’t viewed the weight as the primary problem, instead of a possible symptom (in the process completely disbelieving my reports), it’s possible I could have been diagnosed a decade ago
</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve not heard before that excess GH leads to obesity or that obesity is a symptom of acromegaly. So no, its not a symptom, nor is extreme hunger for that matter.</p>
<p>Unfortunately most GPs  rarely deal with very rare conditions such as acromegaly so the doctors probably missed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semi-regular</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-224165</link>
		<dc:creator>Semi-regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 01:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-224165</guid>
		<description>Wow - thanks Jason, I'll do that. I hadn't run into anybody else with a pituitary adenoma yet, let alone acromegaly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow - thanks Jason, I&#8217;ll do that. I hadn&#8217;t run into anybody else with a pituitary adenoma yet, let alone acromegaly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-224084</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-224084</guid>
		<description>A note to 'Semi-regular'.  I've noticed a significant increase in weight due to my Acromegaly and I know a few others with the condition who have too.   Feel free to browse my blog for my dieting results, treatment etc.. .(As I'm sure you'll know, Acromegaly is pretty rare!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A note to &#8216;Semi-regular&#8217;.  I&#8217;ve noticed a significant increase in weight due to my Acromegaly and I know a few others with the condition who have too.   Feel free to browse my blog for my dieting results, treatment etc.. .(As I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll know, Acromegaly is pretty rare!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semi-regular</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223739</link>
		<dc:creator>Semi-regular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223739</guid>
		<description>I'm a semi-regular poster here, but not quite willing to discuss this in detail non-anonymously yet. Apologies.

During each of my two pregnancies I gained 40+ pounds, and then only lost 15. I was completely unable to lose more weight than that no matter what I did, even though when not pregnant my weight is extremely stable. My foot size grew, and my ring size grew.  During pregnancy I was hungry to the point that I could not get full, no matter how much I ate (literally, at one point I was so hungry that I decided to screw watching what I ate, and went to an all-you-can eat Chinese buffet. After four full plates, I gave up. I was still as hungry as when I had gone in.) None of this set off any alarm bells in anyone.

Fast forward six years - I've just been diagnosed with a pituitary tumor. I've had it in my skull for at least nine years, and pregnancy hormones make it (and me) grow. If I weren't related to an excellent neurologist who noticed the hand growth and forehead growth, and ran me through an MRI, I still wouldn't know. I likely wouldn't have found out until the tumor started squeezing my optic nerves (which it's resting against).  If I had developed diabetes (common with acromegaly), it would probably have been chalked up to my obesity, despite my generally good diet, and excellent physical condition.

If every physician I've ever had hadn't viewed the weight as the primary problem, instead of a possible symptom (in the process completely disbelieving my reports), it's possible I could have been diagnosed a decade ago. As it is, I have to feel incredibly lucky that I was diagnosed after only a decade or so, instead of when I went blind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a semi-regular poster here, but not quite willing to discuss this in detail non-anonymously yet. Apologies.</p>
<p>During each of my two pregnancies I gained 40+ pounds, and then only lost 15. I was completely unable to lose more weight than that no matter what I did, even though when not pregnant my weight is extremely stable. My foot size grew, and my ring size grew.  During pregnancy I was hungry to the point that I could not get full, no matter how much I ate (literally, at one point I was so hungry that I decided to screw watching what I ate, and went to an all-you-can eat Chinese buffet. After four full plates, I gave up. I was still as hungry as when I had gone in.) None of this set off any alarm bells in anyone.</p>
<p>Fast forward six years - I&#8217;ve just been diagnosed with a pituitary tumor. I&#8217;ve had it in my skull for at least nine years, and pregnancy hormones make it (and me) grow. If I weren&#8217;t related to an excellent neurologist who noticed the hand growth and forehead growth, and ran me through an MRI, I still wouldn&#8217;t know. I likely wouldn&#8217;t have found out until the tumor started squeezing my optic nerves (which it&#8217;s resting against).  If I had developed diabetes (common with acromegaly), it would probably have been chalked up to my obesity, despite my generally good diet, and excellent physical condition.</p>
<p>If every physician I&#8217;ve ever had hadn&#8217;t viewed the weight as the primary problem, instead of a possible symptom (in the process completely disbelieving my reports), it&#8217;s possible I could have been diagnosed a decade ago. As it is, I have to feel incredibly lucky that I was diagnosed after only a decade or so, instead of when I went blind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223511</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223511</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah. Correlation does not equal causation, especially if the correlation is not true in all cases.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To be blunt -- this is just pure denial. There are a vast number of medical conditions and recommendations that are based on statistical data.  You will almost never find a medical correlation that is true in all cases.  AThere will always be people who smoke 5 packets a day and spend their nights in a radon filled basement and never get lung cancer.  There are people with Type 2 diabetes who do not control their diet at all, and never suffer from kidney, heart, eye or nerve disease. But we know from strong statistical evidence that smoking vastly increases the risk of lung cancer or that diabetes vastly increases risk of a dozen types of damage to your body. 

if you wanted 100 % correlation, you would never take a medication, never get vaccinated, since no medication or vaccine works for everyone.  Equally, there are many drugs or diseases for which we don't know the exact pathology. B

And while we don't know the exact mechanism yet, there are many theories, with some evidence as to why obesity is a strong risk factor for diabetes. Obesity is a cause/symptom of insulin resistance, which is almost always required for type II diabetes. Also, the fat reserves in our body are known to release various inflammatory hormones and free fatty acids that possibly kill pancreatic insulin secreting beta-cells.  

No, we don't know for sure, but there is lots about diabetes (and indeed many diseases) that we don't know for sure.  I'm sure we will know more in the future, just as we will know more about heart disease, stroke, Alzheimers and so on. 

Not all people with type 2 diabetes are obese, not all obese people get diabetes. But  we do know is that obesity is a huge risk factor for diabetes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yeah. Correlation does not equal causation, especially if the correlation is not true in all cases.</p></blockquote>
<p>To be blunt &#8212; this is just pure denial. There are a vast number of medical conditions and recommendations that are based on statistical data.  You will almost never find a medical correlation that is true in all cases.  AThere will always be people who smoke 5 packets a day and spend their nights in a radon filled basement and never get lung cancer.  There are people with Type 2 diabetes who do not control their diet at all, and never suffer from kidney, heart, eye or nerve disease. But we know from strong statistical evidence that smoking vastly increases the risk of lung cancer or that diabetes vastly increases risk of a dozen types of damage to your body. </p>
<p>if you wanted 100 % correlation, you would never take a medication, never get vaccinated, since no medication or vaccine works for everyone.  Equally, there are many drugs or diseases for which we don&#8217;t know the exact pathology. B</p>
<p>And while we don&#8217;t know the exact mechanism yet, there are many theories, with some evidence as to why obesity is a strong risk factor for diabetes. Obesity is a cause/symptom of insulin resistance, which is almost always required for type II diabetes. Also, the fat reserves in our body are known to release various inflammatory hormones and free fatty acids that possibly kill pancreatic insulin secreting beta-cells.  </p>
<p>No, we don&#8217;t know for sure, but there is lots about diabetes (and indeed many diseases) that we don&#8217;t know for sure.  I&#8217;m sure we will know more in the future, just as we will know more about heart disease, stroke, Alzheimers and so on. </p>
<p>Not all people with type 2 diabetes are obese, not all obese people get diabetes. But  we do know is that obesity is a huge risk factor for diabetes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223496</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223496</guid>
		<description>"My personal favorite, though, had to be the diabetes lecture where we were given a graph showing rates of obesity and rates of type II diabetes in various countries. The rates did not match up; some countries were identified as having soaring obesity and relatively stable diabetes rates, while others had soaring diabetes and relatively stable obesity rates. The conclusion drawn in the lecture was that the data must be wrong, because, after all, we all know that obesity causes diabetes! If it wasn’t so disturbing it would be quite funny - after all, I’m pretty sure I was taught at some point that the scientific method anevidence-based medicine are not _supposed_ to be about discarding data that do not match your pet hypothesis… ;-)"

Obesity does not cause diabetes.  However,  it is a very strong risk factor. The  scientific evidence for that is undeniable.  There is also strong evidence that diet, exercise and relative modest weight reduction can delay or prevent the onset of diabetes (see the reports of the DPP studies). It is unscientific to deny that. 

Now, I don't know what charts were being referred to here, but all epidemiologists and medical professionals know that you cannot always compare directly between different countries and indeed it is unscientific to do so. Data from developing countries is often poor and out-of-date. The average age in different countries tends to vary a lot, and older populations are more likely to have higher incidence rates of disease.  Finally, ethnic stock, lifetstyle and diet tends to vary a lot (there is some evidence that the Med diet may be protective). 

Furthermore it is also true that the BMI calculations and definition of "obesity" may not be completely valid for different ethnicities. Indeed, there is plenty of evidence that Asian and South Asian first generation immigrants in the US have considerably higher risks than Caucasian Americans with the same BMI (or the same blood pressure or cholestrol for that matter).  All of this would be an argument for trying to use different metrics for people with different ethnic backgrounds (lower BP, lower BMI, lower LDL targets).  Not for saying that such tables aren't useful !!

The so-called diseases of affluence (diabetes, obesity, heart disease) are exploding in China and India, and yes there is evidence that obesity is increasing in these countries. There was a report just a few days back that incidence of obesity had increased in India (so equally unfortunately, had the rate of malnutrition).  I would suggest reading the WHO reports on diabetes in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My personal favorite, though, had to be the diabetes lecture where we were given a graph showing rates of obesity and rates of type II diabetes in various countries. The rates did not match up; some countries were identified as having soaring obesity and relatively stable diabetes rates, while others had soaring diabetes and relatively stable obesity rates. The conclusion drawn in the lecture was that the data must be wrong, because, after all, we all know that obesity causes diabetes! If it wasn’t so disturbing it would be quite funny - after all, I’m pretty sure I was taught at some point that the scientific method anevidence-based medicine are not _supposed_ to be about discarding data that do not match your pet hypothesis… ;-)&#8221;</p>
<p>Obesity does not cause diabetes.  However,  it is a very strong risk factor. The  scientific evidence for that is undeniable.  There is also strong evidence that diet, exercise and relative modest weight reduction can delay or prevent the onset of diabetes (see the reports of the DPP studies). It is unscientific to deny that. </p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t know what charts were being referred to here, but all epidemiologists and medical professionals know that you cannot always compare directly between different countries and indeed it is unscientific to do so. Data from developing countries is often poor and out-of-date. The average age in different countries tends to vary a lot, and older populations are more likely to have higher incidence rates of disease.  Finally, ethnic stock, lifetstyle and diet tends to vary a lot (there is some evidence that the Med diet may be protective). </p>
<p>Furthermore it is also true that the BMI calculations and definition of &#8220;obesity&#8221; may not be completely valid for different ethnicities. Indeed, there is plenty of evidence that Asian and South Asian first generation immigrants in the US have considerably higher risks than Caucasian Americans with the same BMI (or the same blood pressure or cholestrol for that matter).  All of this would be an argument for trying to use different metrics for people with different ethnic backgrounds (lower BP, lower BMI, lower LDL targets).  Not for saying that such tables aren&#8217;t useful !!</p>
<p>The so-called diseases of affluence (diabetes, obesity, heart disease) are exploding in China and India, and yes there is evidence that obesity is increasing in these countries. There was a report just a few days back that incidence of obesity had increased in India (so equally unfortunately, had the rate of malnutrition).  I would suggest reading the WHO reports on diabetes in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223485</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223485</guid>
		<description>Let me respond to a few strawmen

". Or lecturers who tell us that 1200 kCal per day is a reasonable weight-loss diet to recommend to patients"

I'm not aware of any reputable doctor/nutritionist who would suggest a caloric intake more than 500 calories below your BMR. For most adult males, that would be much higher. When I was diagnosed with diabetes, the dietitian recommended a  2300-2400 cal a day diet, saying that diet, with exercise would make me loose a pound a week, which she said was a safe weight loss. In general, very low calorie diets are the prerogative of quack doctors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me respond to a few strawmen</p>
<p>&#8220;. Or lecturers who tell us that 1200 kCal per day is a reasonable weight-loss diet to recommend to patients&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not aware of any reputable doctor/nutritionist who would suggest a caloric intake more than 500 calories below your BMR. For most adult males, that would be much higher. When I was diagnosed with diabetes, the dietitian recommended a  2300-2400 cal a day diet, saying that diet, with exercise would make me loose a pound a week, which she said was a safe weight loss. In general, very low calorie diets are the prerogative of quack doctors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223483</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223483</guid>
		<description>I think that medical professionals should treat all patients with respect and courtesy.  I also do believe that medical professionals should indeed behave differently with obese patients. They should urge them (gently, but firmly) to loose weight. 

I know what I speak of.  I've been obese for years, when I went to doctors for a yearly checkup, they would just gently  suggest that I should loose weight with diet and exercise. I never paid much attention, and I had no family history of heart disease, hypertension, diabetes. Then, last year, I was diagnosed with diabetes at such a checkup.

 I did a lot of research after that and learned that fasting blood sugar (the criterion used for diagnosis) is practically the last indice to deterioriate. You could run high postprandial blood sugars for years and have a normal blood sugar, as I did, with final deterioration coming on over a year or so. But a lot of the damage has already been done --- FBS deterioration is a fairly advanced stage of the disease. 

So yes, obesity is a huge risk factor for diabetes. You can roll the dice and assume your genes will protect you (as I thought). You can deny that -- its your own pancreas, heart, limbs, kidney and eyes.  But any health care provider who soft pedals your risk is not doing you a favor, but the greatest disservice of your life. I wish my doctors had been more insistent (although to be honest, I would probably have ignored them anyway).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that medical professionals should treat all patients with respect and courtesy.  I also do believe that medical professionals should indeed behave differently with obese patients. They should urge them (gently, but firmly) to loose weight. </p>
<p>I know what I speak of.  I&#8217;ve been obese for years, when I went to doctors for a yearly checkup, they would just gently  suggest that I should loose weight with diet and exercise. I never paid much attention, and I had no family history of heart disease, hypertension, diabetes. Then, last year, I was diagnosed with diabetes at such a checkup.</p>
<p> I did a lot of research after that and learned that fasting blood sugar (the criterion used for diagnosis) is practically the last indice to deterioriate. You could run high postprandial blood sugars for years and have a normal blood sugar, as I did, with final deterioration coming on over a year or so. But a lot of the damage has already been done &#8212; FBS deterioration is a fairly advanced stage of the disease. </p>
<p>So yes, obesity is a huge risk factor for diabetes. You can roll the dice and assume your genes will protect you (as I thought). You can deny that &#8212; its your own pancreas, heart, limbs, kidney and eyes.  But any health care provider who soft pedals your risk is not doing you a favor, but the greatest disservice of your life. I wish my doctors had been more insistent (although to be honest, I would probably have ignored them anyway).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hp</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223073</link>
		<dc:creator>hp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-223073</guid>
		<description>Orange:

Also, try to get tested when the symptoms are at their worse (if there is a worse). 

My family has a history of Grave's disease (hyperthyroidism), but with an odd presentation. The thyroid does not fail completely--it cycles. If the person is tested at the right time (while the thyroid is in a hyper state) they are diagnosed. If not, the levels may be normal, or even low (hypothyroidism). Not all doctors know that this can be an abnormal Grave's presentation. A lot of doctors--especially GPs--operate under the idea that the thyroid rarely changes state, and that thyroid diseases are either all or nothing. This is not always true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orange:</p>
<p>Also, try to get tested when the symptoms are at their worse (if there is a worse). </p>
<p>My family has a history of Grave&#8217;s disease (hyperthyroidism), but with an odd presentation. The thyroid does not fail completely&#8211;it cycles. If the person is tested at the right time (while the thyroid is in a hyper state) they are diagnosed. If not, the levels may be normal, or even low (hypothyroidism). Not all doctors know that this can be an abnormal Grave&#8217;s presentation. A lot of doctors&#8211;especially GPs&#8211;operate under the idea that the thyroid rarely changes state, and that thyroid diseases are either all or nothing. This is not always true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orange</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-222988</link>
		<dc:creator>orange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-222988</guid>
		<description>Medstudent- No, no, I'm glad it made me upset ! Because I need to have the strength to go do something about it. :) Thank you again.

And to everyone else: I can't tell you how much I appreciate hearing that other people have gone through the same struggles and come out better on the other side. I will take your advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medstudent- No, no, I&#8217;m glad it made me upset ! Because I need to have the strength to go do something about it. :) Thank you again.</p>
<p>And to everyone else: I can&#8217;t tell you how much I appreciate hearing that other people have gone through the same struggles and come out better on the other side. I will take your advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mythago</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-222159</link>
		<dc:creator>mythago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-222159</guid>
		<description>orange, tell your doctor you would like a copy of your medical file, because you were talking to a lawyer friend the other day about your medical issues. If that doesn't go off like a bomb I don't know what will.

NO doctor with half a brain rules out thyroid problems just because a patient is fat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>orange, tell your doctor you would like a copy of your medical file, because you were talking to a lawyer friend the other day about your medical issues. If that doesn&#8217;t go off like a bomb I don&#8217;t know what will.</p>
<p>NO doctor with half a brain rules out thyroid problems just because a patient is fat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john hassler</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-222080</link>
		<dc:creator>john hassler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-222080</guid>
		<description>I've noticed that some people look at my wife with contempor disgust.  What is going on in these peoples minds for them to have created such an attitude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that some people look at my wife with contempor disgust.  What is going on in these peoples minds for them to have created such an attitude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q Grrl</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-222052</link>
		<dc:creator>Q Grrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-222052</guid>
		<description>Orange:  I urge you to find other doctor's, until you find one who will listen to you.  It took me 7 years until I found an MD willing to prescribe Synthroid for me.  I was repeatedly told that I was "depressed" when I brought in my page-long list of classic hypothyroid symptoms (brittle and receding hair, loss of eyebrows, weight gain, lethargy, mental confusion).  I kept telling them that "hell yeah, I was depressed... because of the symptoms".  duh.  

But also know that being treated for hypothyroid in no means reduces your weight!  It makes you feel better, but I can attest to the fact that weight gain is quite possible while being treated.  :)  

Good luck!

oh, when getting tested, always ask for the full thyroid panel, with all the bells and whistles.  Check T4, T3, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orange:  I urge you to find other doctor&#8217;s, until you find one who will listen to you.  It took me 7 years until I found an MD willing to prescribe Synthroid for me.  I was repeatedly told that I was &#8220;depressed&#8221; when I brought in my page-long list of classic hypothyroid symptoms (brittle and receding hair, loss of eyebrows, weight gain, lethargy, mental confusion).  I kept telling them that &#8220;hell yeah, I was depressed&#8230; because of the symptoms&#8221;.  duh.  </p>
<p>But also know that being treated for hypothyroid in no means reduces your weight!  It makes you feel better, but I can attest to the fact that weight gain is quite possible while being treated.  :)  </p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
<p>oh, when getting tested, always ask for the full thyroid panel, with all the bells and whistles.  Check T4, T3, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaethe</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-221915</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaethe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-221915</guid>
		<description>Good post.  Good comments.  

Orange, I hope you find a reasonable doctor soon.  And please don't forget to report to EVERYONE why you're leaving the old one.  Doctors who don't treat their patients well should go into labratory research, or surveys.  I've more experience with docs who treat women badly for their reproductive choices.  Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.  Good comments.  </p>
<p>Orange, I hope you find a reasonable doctor soon.  And please don&#8217;t forget to report to EVERYONE why you&#8217;re leaving the old one.  Doctors who don&#8217;t treat their patients well should go into labratory research, or surveys.  I&#8217;ve more experience with docs who treat women badly for their reproductive choices.  Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-221856</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/12/28/anti-fat-bias-in-medical-school/#comment-221856</guid>
		<description>My husband is a Vietnam vet, who was sprayed several times with Agent Orange (a 'jungle defolient').  As he says, anything that kills jungle just can' t be good for you.  He was diagnosed as a type II diabetic about 4 years ago.  There are currently 9 diseases directly associated with Agent Orange, to the degree that the Veteran's Administration deems them 'presumed service connected' if you have documented exposure to Agent Orange.  8 of the diseases are forms of leukemia.  In 2002 the VA added type II diabetes as number 9.  I suspect that one of the countries that has a high rate of type II diabetes and a low or stable rate of obesiety would be Vietnam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband is a Vietnam vet, who was sprayed several times with Agent Orange (a &#8216;jungle defolient&#8217;).  As he says, anything that kills jungle just can&#8217; t be good for you.  He was diagnosed as a type II diabetic about 4 years ago.  There are currently 9 diseases directly associated with Agent Orange, to the degree that the Veteran&#8217;s Administration deems them &#8216;presumed service connected&#8217; if you have documented exposure to Agent Orange.  8 of the diseases are forms of leukemia.  In 2002 the VA added type II diabetes as number 9.  I suspect that one of the countries that has a high rate of type II diabetes and a low or stable rate of obesiety would be Vietnam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
