<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sexualized Images in Media Harm Women and Girls, Duh!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: What was that on last EP of Bleach? - Action Discussion - Adult Swim</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-291353</link>
		<dc:creator>What was that on last EP of Bleach? - Action Discussion - Adult Swim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-291353</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] to Nanashigurl01 - Message ID#: 3743314It pains me to see a woman think the way you do.http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh...I think you should read this and understand what your real job as a woman is.  I just love the sexy [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] to Nanashigurl01 - Message ID#: 3743314It pains me to see a woman think the way you do.http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh&#8230;I think you should read this and understand what your real job as a woman is.  I just love the sexy [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245644</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245644</guid>
		<description>Someone wake me up when it's time to discuss the boycott.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone wake me up when it&#8217;s time to discuss the boycott.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245608</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245608</guid>
		<description>The report also zeroed in on instances in which a person’s value came &lt;b&gt;only from her/his sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics&lt;/b&gt;, and was made into a thing for another’s sexual use in the media. 

How often are males valued &lt;b&gt;only from his sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics&lt;/b&gt;and made into a thing for another’s sexual use in the media on television, music videos, music lyrics, magazines, movies, video games and the Internet?

On television, men are not valued only for the sexual appeal to the exclusion of other characteristics. They're usually a doctor, a lawyer, a detective, a CEO, a plumber. Men in music videos usually write the music and are doing something besides looking good. Men usually write music lyrics and are not sexually objectified in them. Men are not sexual objects to the exclusion of other characteristics in magazines. They are doing something and not just posing. This is not the same as gay porn or the occasional women's entertainment magazine of course. The hottest guys are in the gay men's magazines anyway. In movies, video games and the internet,women are sexually objectified not men. There aren't many websites dedicated to the sexual appeal of men. Porn was not part of the study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The report also zeroed in on instances in which a person’s value came <b>only from her/his sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics</b>, and was made into a thing for another’s sexual use in the media. </p>
<p>How often are males valued <b>only from his sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics</b>and made into a thing for another’s sexual use in the media on television, music videos, music lyrics, magazines, movies, video games and the Internet?</p>
<p>On television, men are not valued only for the sexual appeal to the exclusion of other characteristics. They&#8217;re usually a doctor, a lawyer, a detective, a CEO, a plumber. Men in music videos usually write the music and are doing something besides looking good. Men usually write music lyrics and are not sexually objectified in them. Men are not sexual objects to the exclusion of other characteristics in magazines. They are doing something and not just posing. This is not the same as gay porn or the occasional women&#8217;s entertainment magazine of course. The hottest guys are in the gay men&#8217;s magazines anyway. In movies, video games and the internet,women are sexually objectified not men. There aren&#8217;t many websites dedicated to the sexual appeal of men. Porn was not part of the study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245506</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245506</guid>
		<description>The APA report clearly found "operational, measurable, testable examples" where capitalism and patriarchy worked together to cause negative cognitive and emotional consequences, mental and physical health problems such as eating disorders, low self-esteem, and depression or depressed mood in girls and negative consequences on girls’ ability to develop a healthy sexual self-image:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The provocative research included a study of published research on the content and effects of virtually every form of media, including television, music videos, music lyrics, magazines, movies, video games and the Internet. Researchers also examined recent advertising campaigns and merchandising of products aimed toward girls.

Sexualization was defined by the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls as occurring when a person’s value comes only from her/his sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics, and when a person is sexually objectified, e.g., made into a thing for another’s sexual use.

Then later they lay out the negative effects:

• Cognitive and Emotional Consequences: Sexualization and objectification undermine a person’s confidence in and comfort with her own body, leading to emotional and self-image problems, such as shame and anxiety.
• Mental and Physical Health: Research links sexualization with three of the most common mental health problems diagnosed in girls and women—eating disorders, low self-esteem, and depression or depressed mood.
• Sexual Development: Research suggests that the sexualization of girls has negative consequences on girls’ ability to develop a healthy sexual self-image.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The APA report clearly found &#8220;operational, measurable, testable examples&#8221; where capitalism and patriarchy worked together to cause negative cognitive and emotional consequences, mental and physical health problems such as eating disorders, low self-esteem, and depression or depressed mood in girls and negative consequences on girls’ ability to develop a healthy sexual self-image:</p>
<blockquote><p>The provocative research included a study of published research on the content and effects of virtually every form of media, including television, music videos, music lyrics, magazines, movies, video games and the Internet. Researchers also examined recent advertising campaigns and merchandising of products aimed toward girls.</p>
<p>Sexualization was defined by the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls as occurring when a person’s value comes only from her/his sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics, and when a person is sexually objectified, e.g., made into a thing for another’s sexual use.</p>
<p>Then later they lay out the negative effects:</p>
<p>• Cognitive and Emotional Consequences: Sexualization and objectification undermine a person’s confidence in and comfort with her own body, leading to emotional and self-image problems, such as shame and anxiety.<br />
• Mental and Physical Health: Research links sexualization with three of the most common mental health problems diagnosed in girls and women—eating disorders, low self-esteem, and depression or depressed mood.<br />
• Sexual Development: Research suggests that the sexualization of girls has negative consequences on girls’ ability to develop a healthy sexual self-image.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mandolin</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245443</link>
		<dc:creator>mandolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245443</guid>
		<description>Robert:

"Patriarchal capitalism killed my dog, shaved Britney’s head, and never puts the fucking mayonnaise back in the fridge after it makes its BLTs.

God, I hate that."

Sailorman:

"What are you having trouble being civil about?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert:</p>
<p>&#8220;Patriarchal capitalism killed my dog, shaved Britney’s head, and never puts the fucking mayonnaise back in the fridge after it makes its BLTs.</p>
<p>God, I hate that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sailorman:</p>
<p>&#8220;What are you having trouble being civil about?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245398</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245398</guid>
		<description>I apologize for dominating the thread so much -- I thought I was trying to respond to questions that had been asked of me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize for dominating the thread so much &#8212; I thought I was trying to respond to questions that had been asked of me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ampersand</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245395</link>
		<dc:creator>Ampersand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245395</guid>
		<description>Anon, of the 24 posts on this thread so far, 12 have been by you.  There's no formal rule about this, but in general I think it's problematic when one person dominates a thread so much. Please try to cool it a bit.

In addition, something about your tone does seem a bit... mocking at times.  If that's not what you intend, then perhaps that's something you should work on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, of the 24 posts on this thread so far, 12 have been by you.  There&#8217;s no formal rule about this, but in general I think it&#8217;s problematic when one person dominates a thread so much. Please try to cool it a bit.</p>
<p>In addition, something about your tone does seem a bit&#8230; mocking at times.  If that&#8217;s not what you intend, then perhaps that&#8217;s something you should work on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sailorman</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245373</link>
		<dc:creator>Sailorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245373</guid>
		<description>Rachel,
While I agree with you on the media issues you write about...

What are you having trouble being civil about?  If your main contention is that capitalism is USED to support patriarchy, well, OK.  But of course that doesn't mean capitalism is inherently patriarchal (which you seem to be arguing) as it could just as well be used to support something else.

Patriarchal people in a capitalist society will practice patriarchal capitalism.  Patriarchal people in a socialist society will practice patriarchal socialism.  
And so on.

So I agree it's a problem.
But I also think that some of the above posters are making an obvious point: because patriarchy &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; exist in the U.S., then plain old ordinary capitalism drives folks to play into that patriarchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel,<br />
While I agree with you on the media issues you write about&#8230;</p>
<p>What are you having trouble being civil about?  If your main contention is that capitalism is USED to support patriarchy, well, OK.  But of course that doesn&#8217;t mean capitalism is inherently patriarchal (which you seem to be arguing) as it could just as well be used to support something else.</p>
<p>Patriarchal people in a capitalist society will practice patriarchal capitalism.  Patriarchal people in a socialist society will practice patriarchal socialism.<br />
And so on.</p>
<p>So I agree it&#8217;s a problem.<br />
But I also think that some of the above posters are making an obvious point: because patriarchy <i>does</i> exist in the U.S., then plain old ordinary capitalism drives folks to play into that patriarchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245369</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245369</guid>
		<description>I don't perceive anyone here apologizing for sexism.  I see a group of people trying to find operational, measurable, testable definitions for A) Patriarchy, and B) 3rd Wave Sex Positive Feminism.

I know I am ignorant, but I don't see the value in having a concept like patriarchy and finding it at fault unless there is an operational, measurable, testable definition behind it.  Otherwise it just seems like a vague bogeyman that distracts from concepts that are operationally understood.

Similarly, I think girl gone wild videos are pretty horrible things, but I believe I understand that for some young feminist women, similar behavior may be part of reclaiming their rights.  I am trying to understand when a woman exposing herself is part of a sexist display and when it may be part of a feminist behavior.

I think it should be easy for you to be civil, because no one here is attacking you personally, people here are trying, in good faith, to continue the discussion you started.  I would think you would be flattered (in a good way) that people think your ideas merit their time and participation in discussing (I know I would be), and that you have an opportunity here to help refine your own understanding of your ideas as well as to help enlighten others.   All in all, that seems to be a win-win (though I admit I may be viewing this in a patriarchal context.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t perceive anyone here apologizing for sexism.  I see a group of people trying to find operational, measurable, testable definitions for A) Patriarchy, and B) 3rd Wave Sex Positive Feminism.</p>
<p>I know I am ignorant, but I don&#8217;t see the value in having a concept like patriarchy and finding it at fault unless there is an operational, measurable, testable definition behind it.  Otherwise it just seems like a vague bogeyman that distracts from concepts that are operationally understood.</p>
<p>Similarly, I think girl gone wild videos are pretty horrible things, but I believe I understand that for some young feminist women, similar behavior may be part of reclaiming their rights.  I am trying to understand when a woman exposing herself is part of a sexist display and when it may be part of a feminist behavior.</p>
<p>I think it should be easy for you to be civil, because no one here is attacking you personally, people here are trying, in good faith, to continue the discussion you started.  I would think you would be flattered (in a good way) that people think your ideas merit their time and participation in discussing (I know I would be), and that you have an opportunity here to help refine your own understanding of your ideas as well as to help enlighten others.   All in all, that seems to be a win-win (though I admit I may be viewing this in a patriarchal context.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel S.</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245358</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245358</guid>
		<description>I'm trying very hard to be civil here because I really don't have a great deal of time to defend my view from a bunch of sexism apologists, who want to minimize the harmful effects of sexism and patriarchy on women.  

Simply put, patriarchy means male dominance and the social systems that uphold male dominance.  It is my contention that capitalism is one of the social systems that upholds patriarchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying very hard to be civil here because I really don&#8217;t have a great deal of time to defend my view from a bunch of sexism apologists, who want to minimize the harmful effects of sexism and patriarchy on women.  </p>
<p>Simply put, patriarchy means male dominance and the social systems that uphold male dominance.  It is my contention that capitalism is one of the social systems that upholds patriarchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245297</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245297</guid>
		<description>Can someone please define the "Patriarchy" for me as I don't seem to be getting this concept that is so prevelant in feminist discussions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please define the &#8220;Patriarchy&#8221; for me as I don&#8217;t seem to be getting this concept that is so prevelant in feminist discussions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245274</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245274</guid>
		<description>If women were culturally compelled to buy all that hair product and do all that stuff to their hair because of the Patriarchy, I think that shaving your head must be a sign that you are throwing off the Patriarchal Shackles.  But that might just be 2nd wave feminism, and it could be that 3rd wave feminism might be reclaiming the right to buy hair products at which point Britney's head shaving is a patriarchal response.

But her not wearing underwear?  Definitely 3rd wave feminism.

Offtopic: the number "3" in this font is just gorgeous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If women were culturally compelled to buy all that hair product and do all that stuff to their hair because of the Patriarchy, I think that shaving your head must be a sign that you are throwing off the Patriarchal Shackles.  But that might just be 2nd wave feminism, and it could be that 3rd wave feminism might be reclaiming the right to buy hair products at which point Britney&#8217;s head shaving is a patriarchal response.</p>
<p>But her not wearing underwear?  Definitely 3rd wave feminism.</p>
<p>Offtopic: the number &#8220;3&#8243; in this font is just gorgeous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245272</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245272</guid>
		<description>Robert, I don't think it's fair to blame Patriarchal Capitalism for Britney's head shaving behavior.  Law Professor Ann Althouse says that shaving a woman's head is the ultimate suggestion that a woman is more beautiful than others and points to Natalie Portman and Demi Moore (and I will toss in Natassia Kinski.)  So I think it is clear that it is third-wave feminism that is to blame for Britney's head shaving and underwear behavior. 

It confuses me that Britney is a apparently &lt;a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/feb/20/reporting_feminism_are_we_our_own_worst_enemy" rel="nofollow"&gt;third-wave sex positive feminist now&lt;/a&gt;.  Is it really possible that she is a third wave sex positive grrl gone wild?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to blame Patriarchal Capitalism for Britney&#8217;s head shaving behavior.  Law Professor Ann Althouse says that shaving a woman&#8217;s head is the ultimate suggestion that a woman is more beautiful than others and points to Natalie Portman and Demi Moore (and I will toss in Natassia Kinski.)  So I think it is clear that it is third-wave feminism that is to blame for Britney&#8217;s head shaving and underwear behavior. </p>
<p>It confuses me that Britney is a apparently <a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/feb/20/reporting_feminism_are_we_our_own_worst_enemy" rel="nofollow">third-wave sex positive feminist now</a>.  Is it really possible that she is a third wave sex positive grrl gone wild?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245270</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245270</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Patriarchal capitalism is also to blame in pressuring men to take steroids, appear more virile, purchase weights, weight machines, guns, motorcycles and cigarettes because patriarchy reinforces traditional male and female gender identities and roles.&lt;/i&gt;

In a world where we eliminated this patriarchal capitalism, what would capitalism look like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Patriarchal capitalism is also to blame in pressuring men to take steroids, appear more virile, purchase weights, weight machines, guns, motorcycles and cigarettes because patriarchy reinforces traditional male and female gender identities and roles.</i></p>
<p>In a world where we eliminated this patriarchal capitalism, what would capitalism look like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245269</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245269</guid>
		<description>The APA says that PAS doesn't exist.  What does the APA say about "the Patriarchy?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The APA says that PAS doesn&#8217;t exist.  What does the APA say about &#8220;the Patriarchy?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245227</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245227</guid>
		<description>Patriarchal capitalism killed my dog, shaved Britney's head, and never puts the fucking mayonnaise back in the fridge after it makes its BLTs.

God, I hate that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patriarchal capitalism killed my dog, shaved Britney&#8217;s head, and never puts the fucking mayonnaise back in the fridge after it makes its BLTs.</p>
<p>God, I hate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245190</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245190</guid>
		<description>Patriarchal capitalism is also to blame in pressuring men to take steroids, appear more virile, purchase weights, weight machines, guns, motorcycles and cigarettes because patriarchy reinforces traditional male and female gender identities and roles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patriarchal capitalism is also to blame in pressuring men to take steroids, appear more virile, purchase weights, weight machines, guns, motorcycles and cigarettes because patriarchy reinforces traditional male and female gender identities and roles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245188</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245188</guid>
		<description>It's in the report:

&lt;blockquote&gt;American Psychological Association on the negative effects of &lt;b&gt;media sexualization&lt;/b&gt; on women and girls. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hence capitalism and patriarchal.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Sexualization was defined by the APA Task Force on the &lt;b&gt;Sexualization of Girls as occurring when a person’s value comes only from her/his sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics, and when a person is sexually objectified, e.g., made into a thing for another’s sexual use.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Patriarchy includes the objectification of females for male sexual use and when the value of female comes only from her/his sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics. You could argue some ads sexualize males for female use but there are many more representations of females as sexual objects than male. The study included the content and effects of

&lt;blockquote&gt;virtually every form of media, including television, music videos, music lyrics, magazines, movies, video games and the Internet. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

and females are sexually objectified at a much greater frequency on television, in music videos, music lyrics, magazines, movies, video games and the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s in the report:</p>
<blockquote><p>American Psychological Association on the negative effects of <b>media sexualization</b> on women and girls. </p></blockquote>
<p>Hence capitalism and patriarchal.</p>
<blockquote><p>Sexualization was defined by the APA Task Force on the <b>Sexualization of Girls as occurring when a person’s value comes only from her/his sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics, and when a person is sexually objectified, e.g., made into a thing for another’s sexual use.</b></p></blockquote>
<p>Patriarchy includes the objectification of females for male sexual use and when the value of female comes only from her/his sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other characteristics. You could argue some ads sexualize males for female use but there are many more representations of females as sexual objects than male. The study included the content and effects of</p>
<blockquote><p>virtually every form of media, including television, music videos, music lyrics, magazines, movies, video games and the Internet. </p></blockquote>
<p>and females are sexually objectified at a much greater frequency on television, in music videos, music lyrics, magazines, movies, video games and the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245115</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245115</guid>
		<description>Let me ask, the APA described this as a problem with media,  not as a patriarchal problem.  Their recommendations were to educate people about the media, and not to educate people about a patriarchy.  If the APA didn't think that a patriarchy had something to do with this, are you distorting their findings by claiming something they would not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me ask, the APA described this as a problem with media,  not as a patriarchal problem.  Their recommendations were to educate people about the media, and not to educate people about a patriarchy.  If the APA didn&#8217;t think that a patriarchy had something to do with this, are you distorting their findings by claiming something they would not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245110</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/20/sexualized-images-in-media-harm-women-and-girls-duh/#comment-245110</guid>
		<description>I think capitalism has enough sins (*) that there is no need to bring other isms into it to figure out why we see a race to the bottom in terms of media.

(*) I'm not a communist thank you, I think capitalism has many many benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think capitalism has enough sins (*) that there is no need to bring other isms into it to figure out why we see a race to the bottom in terms of media.</p>
<p>(*) I&#8217;m not a communist thank you, I think capitalism has many many benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
