<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US does not equal the world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-252082</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-252082</guid>
		<description>Kate L. , good point.  It was a slip of the keys and def should have read "Americans."

Blackamazon:

&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s not that she complained or that she wrote but other folks experiences were used to back her up when her writing demonstrated little concern for making those experiences known in the essay but willing to use their weight to tangle with these mystic elders.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I used other people's experiences as I could--the folks' experiences I wrote about asked that I NOT include details, their names, etc, because many of them have full time jobs in mainstream fem orgs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate L. , good point.  It was a slip of the keys and def should have read &#8220;Americans.&#8221;</p>
<p>Blackamazon:</p>
<blockquote><p>It’s not that she complained or that she wrote but other folks experiences were used to back her up when her writing demonstrated little concern for making those experiences known in the essay but willing to use their weight to tangle with these mystic elders.</p></blockquote>
<p>I used other people&#8217;s experiences as I could&#8211;the folks&#8217; experiences I wrote about asked that I NOT include details, their names, etc, because many of them have full time jobs in mainstream fem orgs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-251938</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-251938</guid>
		<description>After many many interactions with American feminists, I'm not all that shocked by a) the article itself, b) people defending it.  Americans have a lot to learn about how they are positioned and perceived as citizens of the hegemonic power.  Of course this doesn't apply equally to all Americans or all American feminists, but it's no surprise that feminists of colour get that the US doesn't equal the world.  I read the article, and I didn't see Jessica specify that she was only addressing American feminism (if she did, could someone please point that out?) just saying "feminism" and assuming that your audience knows that you're talking about American feminism is illustrative of the probelm here.  And it seems pretty uniquely American to say "this is how the world sees things," and than protest that you weren't really talking about the world, just America.  

What people aren't getting is that for those of us who don't live in the US, we're essentially being told that we don't have a place at the table.  The public institutional face of feminism in Canada is &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; NOW or the Feminist Majority Foundation, or MS magazine.  Canadian women and our issues are not a part of the mandate of these organizations.  This is the message that women of colour get, and poor women, women with disabilities and everyone else who is not included get.   
If Jessica agrees that these organizations are exclusive, why is it so important that she be a part of them?  Why is it more important that she be included than all the other women who have been doing this work, creating our own organizations and magazines, and conferences without the kind of funding and public recognition that NOW, MS, and FMF (and those that they support) get?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After many many interactions with American feminists, I&#8217;m not all that shocked by a) the article itself, b) people defending it.  Americans have a lot to learn about how they are positioned and perceived as citizens of the hegemonic power.  Of course this doesn&#8217;t apply equally to all Americans or all American feminists, but it&#8217;s no surprise that feminists of colour get that the US doesn&#8217;t equal the world.  I read the article, and I didn&#8217;t see Jessica specify that she was only addressing American feminism (if she did, could someone please point that out?) just saying &#8220;feminism&#8221; and assuming that your audience knows that you&#8217;re talking about American feminism is illustrative of the probelm here.  And it seems pretty uniquely American to say &#8220;this is how the world sees things,&#8221; and than protest that you weren&#8217;t really talking about the world, just America.  </p>
<p>What people aren&#8217;t getting is that for those of us who don&#8217;t live in the US, we&#8217;re essentially being told that we don&#8217;t have a place at the table.  The public institutional face of feminism in Canada is <b>not</b> NOW or the Feminist Majority Foundation, or MS magazine.  Canadian women and our issues are not a part of the mandate of these organizations.  This is the message that women of colour get, and poor women, women with disabilities and everyone else who is not included get.<br />
If Jessica agrees that these organizations are exclusive, why is it so important that she be a part of them?  Why is it more important that she be included than all the other women who have been doing this work, creating our own organizations and magazines, and conferences without the kind of funding and public recognition that NOW, MS, and FMF (and those that they support) get?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250983</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 05:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250983</guid>
		<description>Oddly enough, just last night in the writing class I teach here in Saudi Arabia, I mentioned Gloria Steinem and, although five of the seven Saudi women knew who she was, just one of the expat women did! Feminism is world-wide. It goes by different names - and sometimes isn't even recognized for what it is - but it is alive and well outside MS Magazine and the boundaries of my native America. And to that I say Ilhumdu'Allah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly enough, just last night in the writing class I teach here in Saudi Arabia, I mentioned Gloria Steinem and, although five of the seven Saudi women knew who she was, just one of the expat women did! Feminism is world-wide. It goes by different names - and sometimes isn&#8217;t even recognized for what it is - but it is alive and well outside MS Magazine and the boundaries of my native America. And to that I say Ilhumdu&#8217;Allah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250684</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250684</guid>
		<description>Actually, Howard Dean had the right idea but he's been shunned by the Democratic leadership since November,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Howard Dean had the right idea but he&#8217;s been shunned by the Democratic leadership since November,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250683</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250683</guid>
		<description>Right "young women" should be ALL YOUNG WOMEN. I agree with you there. It's time for feminism to be all-inclusive. It's fucking 2007. They should be truly revolutionary and lead the way. So should all these white male progressives "leaders".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right &#8220;young women&#8221; should be ALL YOUNG WOMEN. I agree with you there. It&#8217;s time for feminism to be all-inclusive. It&#8217;s fucking 2007. They should be truly revolutionary and lead the way. So should all these white male progressives &#8220;leaders&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackamazon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250673</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackamazon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250673</guid>
		<description>But I don't think she did she wrote about how SHE felt unincluded and rather than draw it out she used examples that related to only her and then said " young women"

Dialogue i s good but that's not honest dialogue. It HAS to be precise . Holding her to a standard is dialogue as to and frankly for a lot of us NOW,Jessica, Feminist Majority 

Don't meet the standard 

and until they do we don't want to be lumped in when they try and prove points with each other.

It's not that she complained or that she wrote but other folks experiences were used to back her up when her writing demonstrated little concern for making those experiences known in the essay but willing to use their weight to tangle with these mystic elders</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I don&#8217;t think she did she wrote about how SHE felt unincluded and rather than draw it out she used examples that related to only her and then said &#8221; young women&#8221;</p>
<p>Dialogue i s good but that&#8217;s not honest dialogue. It HAS to be precise . Holding her to a standard is dialogue as to and frankly for a lot of us NOW,Jessica, Feminist Majority </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t meet the standard </p>
<p>and until they do we don&#8217;t want to be lumped in when they try and prove points with each other.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that she complained or that she wrote but other folks experiences were used to back her up when her writing demonstrated little concern for making those experiences known in the essay but willing to use their weight to tangle with these mystic elders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250670</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250670</guid>
		<description>Feminism is definitely exclusive. It's racist, classist, ablist, homophobic, ageist, transphobic, etc. etc. etc. It should represent all women. Feminism ideally represents all people. I want it to be inclusive. What Jessica wrote about is NOW however nonrepresentative it is. It excludes young women and women of color. If she wants to be included in NOW, it won't do any harm. It needs to include ALL women but I don't see how this hurts. It's just more dialogue and dialogue is good. I'm with you on the exclusiveness. Feminism in 2007 should lead the way and be truly revolutionary and radical. Show everyone how it's done. Katha and NOW should do the right thing and be truly revolutionary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feminism is definitely exclusive. It&#8217;s racist, classist, ablist, homophobic, ageist, transphobic, etc. etc. etc. It should represent all women. Feminism ideally represents all people. I want it to be inclusive. What Jessica wrote about is NOW however nonrepresentative it is. It excludes young women and women of color. If she wants to be included in NOW, it won&#8217;t do any harm. It needs to include ALL women but I don&#8217;t see how this hurts. It&#8217;s just more dialogue and dialogue is good. I&#8217;m with you on the exclusiveness. Feminism in 2007 should lead the way and be truly revolutionary and radical. Show everyone how it&#8217;s done. Katha and NOW should do the right thing and be truly revolutionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackamazon</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250663</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackamazon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250663</guid>
		<description>Donna I have to disagree vehemently on this with you. The most publicized face may be NOW and Ms. but it's not the most  public.

And Robert Well Saturn may be smaller and gravitationally not as important but it it spins out.

Earth still screwed.

And thats the problem here. People think big=most important= only thing that matters.

If when you worked internationally the experience was different then older feminist aren't keeping younger feminists out. 

It's a small specific group you want member ship to and to make your desire for membership seem more i necessary it becomes THE face OF THE WORLD.

Except it's BARELY  the face of it's own country's movement. Most feminist theory that  resonated with young women I know , is outside the mainstream.

Most of the condemnations I read about feminism come form American women who feel sorely underrepresented.

And to say that their what the world thinks of is either terribly imprecise , terribly arrogant, or terribly misinformed.

I don't even think of them when I think of American feminism because this institutional speaking for feminism has done SO LITTLE for me.

And I live here.

So I can only imagine how galling it must be to read someone complain about exclusion and use the specter of the importance of these orgs 

As in " you want to really represent I have to be let it to TRULY make it  a representative movement"

meanwhile  the supposedly represented are going

WHO ARE YOU PEOPLE ANYWAY?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna I have to disagree vehemently on this with you. The most publicized face may be NOW and Ms. but it&#8217;s not the most  public.</p>
<p>And Robert Well Saturn may be smaller and gravitationally not as important but it it spins out.</p>
<p>Earth still screwed.</p>
<p>And thats the problem here. People think big=most important= only thing that matters.</p>
<p>If when you worked internationally the experience was different then older feminist aren&#8217;t keeping younger feminists out. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a small specific group you want member ship to and to make your desire for membership seem more i necessary it becomes THE face OF THE WORLD.</p>
<p>Except it&#8217;s BARELY  the face of it&#8217;s own country&#8217;s movement. Most feminist theory that  resonated with young women I know , is outside the mainstream.</p>
<p>Most of the condemnations I read about feminism come form American women who feel sorely underrepresented.</p>
<p>And to say that their what the world thinks of is either terribly imprecise , terribly arrogant, or terribly misinformed.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even think of them when I think of American feminism because this institutional speaking for feminism has done SO LITTLE for me.</p>
<p>And I live here.</p>
<p>So I can only imagine how galling it must be to read someone complain about exclusion and use the specter of the importance of these orgs </p>
<p>As in &#8221; you want to really represent I have to be let it to TRULY make it  a representative movement&#8221;</p>
<p>meanwhile  the supposedly represented are going</p>
<p>WHO ARE YOU PEOPLE ANYWAY?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charline</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250657</link>
		<dc:creator>Charline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 02:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250657</guid>
		<description>already the thought of the existance of a "global feminism" is utterly wrong. the goals of feminists around the world are certainly different - sure, the general aim of equality is a common factor, but as soon as you get less abstract and more to the point, opinions vary widely between feminists of different countries.

ps: i am german, i have never heard of these american ladies and i have lived in several european countries, those names never turned up anywhere. to me the face of feminism is Alice Schwarzer THE most prominent living German feminist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>already the thought of the existance of a &#8220;global feminism&#8221; is utterly wrong. the goals of feminists around the world are certainly different - sure, the general aim of equality is a common factor, but as soon as you get less abstract and more to the point, opinions vary widely between feminists of different countries.</p>
<p>ps: i am german, i have never heard of these american ladies and i have lived in several european countries, those names never turned up anywhere. to me the face of feminism is Alice Schwarzer THE most prominent living German feminist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250579</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 18:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250579</guid>
		<description>Saturn orbits the Sun, crys, but it still has its own moon and ring system. It's just smaller, and - gravitationally speaking - not as important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturn orbits the Sun, crys, but it still has its own moon and ring system. It&#8217;s just smaller, and - gravitationally speaking - not as important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna J</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250578</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250578</guid>
		<description>I'm mostly thinking of my own experience. I lived in Canada for 5+ years and during that time I was only vaguely aware of political happenings in the US and now that I am back in the US, I am only vaguely aware of political happenings in Canada. I know I am not the be all end all of human experience, but I still wouldn't be surprised to know that most people are like this; aware of their surroundings and not so much what is happening somewhere else.

I wasn't sure were you were going with the support and credentials post. It always worries me when I see people try to put academics over experience since I think both have their place in the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m mostly thinking of my own experience. I lived in Canada for 5+ years and during that time I was only vaguely aware of political happenings in the US and now that I am back in the US, I am only vaguely aware of political happenings in Canada. I know I am not the be all end all of human experience, but I still wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to know that most people are like this; aware of their surroundings and not so much what is happening somewhere else.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t sure were you were going with the support and credentials post. It always worries me when I see people try to put academics over experience since I think both have their place in the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crys t</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250576</link>
		<dc:creator>crys t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250576</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this, Maia:  this illustrates one of the very big reasons that trying to have debate/discussion with a lot of these people is so frustrating:  they DO think the USA is the "centre of gravity" and that the rest of us are merely "in their orbit," which makes them absolutely blind to the fact that the rest of us actually have entire worlds of culture and experience orbiting around us.  

Yeah, we are aware of a good bit of what's orbiting around America (and, BTW, most of us tend to be more aware of what's going on in a number of cultures than Americans are), but it is NOT what we dwell on most of the time.....being far too busy paying attention to what's going on around us.

Jessica, Robert:  don't suppose that just because you aren't aware that what goes on with us, that means there is in fact nothing other than what you bestow upon us.   Just because you don't see it does not in any way mean it doesn't exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, Maia:  this illustrates one of the very big reasons that trying to have debate/discussion with a lot of these people is so frustrating:  they DO think the USA is the &#8220;centre of gravity&#8221; and that the rest of us are merely &#8220;in their orbit,&#8221; which makes them absolutely blind to the fact that the rest of us actually have entire worlds of culture and experience orbiting around us.  </p>
<p>Yeah, we are aware of a good bit of what&#8217;s orbiting around America (and, BTW, most of us tend to be more aware of what&#8217;s going on in a number of cultures than Americans are), but it is NOT what we dwell on most of the time&#8230;..being far too busy paying attention to what&#8217;s going on around us.</p>
<p>Jessica, Robert:  don&#8217;t suppose that just because you aren&#8217;t aware that what goes on with us, that means there is in fact nothing other than what you bestow upon us.   Just because you don&#8217;t see it does not in any way mean it doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250574</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250574</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Blind support isn’t a good thing and I’m not sure that citing someone’s curiculum vitae is the best way to advance the discussion either.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'm talking about intellectual interests. Samhita Mukhopadhyay is also passionate about transnational feminisms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Blind support isn’t a good thing and I’m not sure that citing someone’s curiculum vitae is the best way to advance the discussion either.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m talking about intellectual interests. Samhita Mukhopadhyay is also passionate about transnational feminisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250571</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250571</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Perhaps if women in other countries were asked to name the institution they think of to represent feminism they might name American organizations, but I still think that is a stretch since I really doubt they would be aware of what is happening here as much as Americans seem to think they do.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'm probably speaking from what I've read on the web which has mostly condemnations of American feminism and Gloria Steinem by non-Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Perhaps if women in other countries were asked to name the institution they think of to represent feminism they might name American organizations, but I still think that is a stretch since I really doubt they would be aware of what is happening here as much as Americans seem to think they do.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m probably speaking from what I&#8217;ve read on the web which has mostly condemnations of American feminism and Gloria Steinem by non-Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinking girl</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250472</link>
		<dc:creator>thinking girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250472</guid>
		<description>hmmm. I'm still thinking on what Jessica wrote about the generational gap thing, but I wholeheartedly agree with Maia on the america-centric thing.  we really need to stop talking about feminism as an american construct and start recognizing that women have been organizing to protest unfair treatment long before white suffragists hit the scene - and remember that historically, it was mostly women of colour doing this work. I'm half considering chucking the 'feminism' label and going with something a bit more encompassing, like 'women's rights' instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm. I&#8217;m still thinking on what Jessica wrote about the generational gap thing, but I wholeheartedly agree with Maia on the america-centric thing.  we really need to stop talking about feminism as an american construct and start recognizing that women have been organizing to protest unfair treatment long before white suffragists hit the scene - and remember that historically, it was mostly women of colour doing this work. I&#8217;m half considering chucking the &#8216;feminism&#8217; label and going with something a bit more encompassing, like &#8216;women&#8217;s rights&#8217; instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maia</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250453</link>
		<dc:creator>Maia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 12:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250453</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The most public feminist movement has been American. And people worldwide think of Gloria Steinem, Ms. and NOW when they refer to the public face of institutional feminism. Most people worldwide don’t think feminism represents them at all. They may say “Look what those American feminists did to OUR women,” etc. Again, the quote was about the public face of feminism and public feminist institutions not whether or not women worldwide felt represented by them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Donna Darko you are wrong. People who don't know anything about feminism don't pay attention to the institutions of US feminism, and people who know about feminism woud think about their local institutions first.  

New Zealand is pretty influenced by America, and we speak the same language, and I'm fairly certain the most feminists here haven't heard of Feminist Majority Foundation, haven't read Ms, and haven't thought of NOW from one year to the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The most public feminist movement has been American. And people worldwide think of Gloria Steinem, Ms. and NOW when they refer to the public face of institutional feminism. Most people worldwide don’t think feminism represents them at all. They may say “Look what those American feminists did to OUR women,” etc. Again, the quote was about the public face of feminism and public feminist institutions not whether or not women worldwide felt represented by them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Donna Darko you are wrong. People who don&#8217;t know anything about feminism don&#8217;t pay attention to the institutions of US feminism, and people who know about feminism woud think about their local institutions first.  </p>
<p>New Zealand is pretty influenced by America, and we speak the same language, and I&#8217;m fairly certain the most feminists here haven&#8217;t heard of Feminist Majority Foundation, haven&#8217;t read Ms, and haven&#8217;t thought of NOW from one year to the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: britgirlsf</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250350</link>
		<dc:creator>britgirlsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 09:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250350</guid>
		<description>Donna J - I've lived all over the place and in my experience outside of the US and Western Europe most women probably think of the grassroots activist stuff when they think of feminism, if they even think of feminism by that name at all. 
As far as a general sense of Jessica's article...definately America-centric and colonial in it's viewpoint, but I think unintentionally so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna J - I&#8217;ve lived all over the place and in my experience outside of the US and Western Europe most women probably think of the grassroots activist stuff when they think of feminism, if they even think of feminism by that name at all.<br />
As far as a general sense of Jessica&#8217;s article&#8230;definately America-centric and colonial in it&#8217;s viewpoint, but I think unintentionally so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna J</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250301</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 08:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250301</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if women in other countries were asked to name the institution they think of to represent feminism they might name American organizations, but I still think that is a stretch since I really doubt they would be aware of what is happening here as much as Americans seem to think they do. I'd say that britgirlsf has a better idea of what international women would say, women's shelters, rape crisis centers, those women or groups of women who agitated for or are agitating now for things like voting rights in their own countries.

Blind support isn't a good thing and I'm not sure that citing someone's curiculum vitae is the best way to advance the discussion either. You do know that Dubya is a graduate of both Yale and Harvard? I find it especially annoying since we are both women of color when lack of educational opportunities is regularly used to dismiss POC. I'm concerned that you are saying that writing a thesis on postcolonialism at a prestigious American university makes JV better able to discuss what women in other countries think about feminism or any other issue than actual women in those countries who may have even lived for generations with colonialism and it's effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if women in other countries were asked to name the institution they think of to represent feminism they might name American organizations, but I still think that is a stretch since I really doubt they would be aware of what is happening here as much as Americans seem to think they do. I&#8217;d say that britgirlsf has a better idea of what international women would say, women&#8217;s shelters, rape crisis centers, those women or groups of women who agitated for or are agitating now for things like voting rights in their own countries.</p>
<p>Blind support isn&#8217;t a good thing and I&#8217;m not sure that citing someone&#8217;s curiculum vitae is the best way to advance the discussion either. You do know that Dubya is a graduate of both Yale and Harvard? I find it especially annoying since we are both women of color when lack of educational opportunities is regularly used to dismiss POC. I&#8217;m concerned that you are saying that writing a thesis on postcolonialism at a prestigious American university makes JV better able to discuss what women in other countries think about feminism or any other issue than actual women in those countries who may have even lived for generations with colonialism and it&#8217;s effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: britgirlsf</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250117</link>
		<dc:creator>britgirlsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 04:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250117</guid>
		<description>Amen. Wierd how America centric things can get - when I think of the public face of feminism I think of the Fawcett Library, but that's because I'm British and went to school in London. It would never occur to me to think that feminists in, say, Autralia would make the same association.
I'd say that women's shelters and rape crisis centers are the public face of the movement to the extent that there is a public face. I'd also say some individuals are the public face - Steinem, Greer. Many people feel more comfortable with a face than an institution. 
I agree with Jessica to a certain extent that the generational conflict is stronger in the US than everywhere else, though I'm not sure why that should be the case. I just know that I felt that conflict less in the UK than I do here, and when  living in the Middle East and Asia I didn't feel any real generational conflict between feminists at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen. Wierd how America centric things can get - when I think of the public face of feminism I think of the Fawcett Library, but that&#8217;s because I&#8217;m British and went to school in London. It would never occur to me to think that feminists in, say, Autralia would make the same association.<br />
I&#8217;d say that women&#8217;s shelters and rape crisis centers are the public face of the movement to the extent that there is a public face. I&#8217;d also say some individuals are the public face - Steinem, Greer. Many people feel more comfortable with a face than an institution.<br />
I agree with Jessica to a certain extent that the generational conflict is stronger in the US than everywhere else, though I&#8217;m not sure why that should be the case. I just know that I felt that conflict less in the UK than I do here, and when  living in the Middle East and Asia I didn&#8217;t feel any real generational conflict between feminists at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Darko</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250087</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Darko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 03:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/01/us-does-not-equal-the-world/#comment-250087</guid>
		<description>An American representative of global feminism, sorry, not a representative of global feminism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An American representative of global feminism, sorry, not a representative of global feminism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
