<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Problems Leaving Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Radfem</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-257390</link>
		<dc:creator>Radfem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-257390</guid>
		<description>I don't get spammed because of word verfication, but I'm getting tired of people winding up on my site after entering the search terms, "arab sex video". All it does is lead them to an article I wrote on the Port of Seattle Police Department email scandal where emails and videos were sent denigrating  male Arab-Americans, Latinos, Asian-Americans, African-Americans and women of all races. Coming in second are people looking for sites, under "betsy ross" or "betsy ross problems" and I have no idea what that's about. 

Oh and then the former state AG(now in a new elected position) apparently technorati searches for his name every morning. 

But spam, I am spared so far. It's bad enough in email. More and more seems to get past the filter systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get spammed because of word verfication, but I&#8217;m getting tired of people winding up on my site after entering the search terms, &#8220;arab sex video&#8221;. All it does is lead them to an article I wrote on the Port of Seattle Police Department email scandal where emails and videos were sent denigrating  male Arab-Americans, Latinos, Asian-Americans, African-Americans and women of all races. Coming in second are people looking for sites, under &#8220;betsy ross&#8221; or &#8220;betsy ross problems&#8221; and I have no idea what that&#8217;s about. </p>
<p>Oh and then the former state AG(now in a new elected position) apparently technorati searches for his name every morning. </p>
<p>But spam, I am spared so far. It&#8217;s bad enough in email. More and more seems to get past the filter systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256774</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256774</guid>
		<description>What Nick Kasoff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Nick Kasoff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Kasoff - The Thug Report</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256737</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kasoff - The Thug Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256737</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Make spamming a capital offense.&lt;/b&gt; Engage the CIA in hunting down spammers around the world. We spend so much time defending ourselves against these dirt bags, I say no penalty is too harsh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Make spamming a capital offense.</b> Engage the CIA in hunting down spammers around the world. We spend so much time defending ourselves against these dirt bags, I say no penalty is too harsh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nexyjo</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256633</link>
		<dc:creator>nexyjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256633</guid>
		<description>i got an email back from akismet advising me that the problem should be fixed now.  apparently, he's right. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i got an email back from akismet advising me that the problem should be fixed now.  apparently, he&#8217;s right. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucia</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256532</link>
		<dc:creator>lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256532</guid>
		<description>You probably do get more spam than most blogs.  At one point, I blogged about a list of spam words appearing in referrers I had blocked using .htaccess.   Later on, I found that &lt;i&gt;specific post&lt;/i&gt; attracted 99% of my spam. It was amazing. For better or worse, your blog discusses sexual topics, and you are going to attract a lot of spam bot.

Even just discussing knitting, I get a lot.  To help keep the load down, I use spamkarma with the askismet plugin. Spamkarma rates the spam and just deletes a lot of it.  It also gives positive karma point to people who have posted comments before. So, regulars are unlikely to be blocked. 

If you add the akismet plugin, the borderline stuff is sent on the akismet.  So, you still get the akismet function but don't need to look at quite so much stuff. I also use badbehavior to keep the number of 'bot off the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably do get more spam than most blogs.  At one point, I blogged about a list of spam words appearing in referrers I had blocked using .htaccess.   Later on, I found that <i>specific post</i> attracted 99% of my spam. It was amazing. For better or worse, your blog discusses sexual topics, and you are going to attract a lot of spam bot.</p>
<p>Even just discussing knitting, I get a lot.  To help keep the load down, I use spamkarma with the askismet plugin. Spamkarma rates the spam and just deletes a lot of it.  It also gives positive karma point to people who have posted comments before. So, regulars are unlikely to be blocked. </p>
<p>If you add the akismet plugin, the borderline stuff is sent on the akismet.  So, you still get the akismet function but don&#8217;t need to look at quite so much stuff. I also use badbehavior to keep the number of &#8216;bot off the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256483</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256483</guid>
		<description>I was getting a few hundred a day, just in the past week or so it's gone up to about 1500 a day. Aksimet blocks 99.99% of them, and I have moderation on for anyone who I haven't previously ok'ed to post and that catches the rest of them.

But, yes, what a pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was getting a few hundred a day, just in the past week or so it&#8217;s gone up to about 1500 a day. Aksimet blocks 99.99% of them, and I have moderation on for anyone who I haven&#8217;t previously ok&#8217;ed to post and that catches the rest of them.</p>
<p>But, yes, what a pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nexyjo</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256041</link>
		<dc:creator>nexyjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-256041</guid>
		<description>test comment from my pc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test comment from my pc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radfem</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255980</link>
		<dc:creator>Radfem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255980</guid>
		<description>Regarding blogger and blogspot:

You can go to this Web site to find more information on issues with blogger comments. 

&lt;a href="http://status.blogger.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Status of Blogger's comments&lt;/a&gt;


One way to get around it is to just ignore the empty word-verification box and just press publish. When it comes up again, your message should still be there and hopefully the symbols will be also. Keep doing this a couple times and most of the time the word verification symbols should come up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding blogger and blogspot:</p>
<p>You can go to this Web site to find more information on issues with blogger comments. </p>
<p><a href="http://status.blogger.com" rel="nofollow">Status of Blogger&#8217;s comments</a></p>
<p>One way to get around it is to just ignore the empty word-verification box and just press publish. When it comes up again, your message should still be there and hopefully the symbols will be also. Keep doing this a couple times and most of the time the word verification symbols should come up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sailorman</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255973</link>
		<dc:creator>Sailorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255973</guid>
		<description>THAT'S what happened to my posts.  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THAT&#8217;S what happened to my posts.  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Squid</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255963</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255963</guid>
		<description>I found that either akismet is very responsive to the, "Hey, I'm not spam you stupid fuckers!" email/form filling or that it takes clearing my comments twice to allow my comments through.

So, akismet hated me but now we're all, like, best buds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that either akismet is very responsive to the, &#8220;Hey, I&#8217;m not spam you stupid fuckers!&#8221; email/form filling or that it takes clearing my comments twice to allow my comments through.</p>
<p>So, akismet hated me but now we&#8217;re all, like, best buds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin T. Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255936</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin T. Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255936</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;400+ spam comments a day . . . it’s my impression that I get more spam than many bloggers do &lt;/em&gt;

I have a very, very low-traffic blog that's been up not quite two years. I routinely get over a thousand spams a day, and lately it's been close to 2,000. Akismet gets virtually all of them, and sometimes puts a handful into moderation. Maybe 1/10 of 1% actually get onto the comments threads (where they are often the only comment!). I don't know what its false-positive rate is because there are simply too many spams to review, but after reviewing the first few thousand and never finding a false positive, I finally stopped worrying about it.

Akismet is certainly a god-send (or is that "fate-send", given the name?). But I'm shocked to hear you're getting "only" a few hundred spams on a blog as visible and long-running as this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>400+ spam comments a day . . . it’s my impression that I get more spam than many bloggers do </em></p>
<p>I have a very, very low-traffic blog that&#8217;s been up not quite two years. I routinely get over a thousand spams a day, and lately it&#8217;s been close to 2,000. Akismet gets virtually all of them, and sometimes puts a handful into moderation. Maybe 1/10 of 1% actually get onto the comments threads (where they are often the only comment!). I don&#8217;t know what its false-positive rate is because there are simply too many spams to review, but after reviewing the first few thousand and never finding a false positive, I finally stopped worrying about it.</p>
<p>Akismet is certainly a god-send (or is that &#8220;fate-send&#8221;, given the name?). But I&#8217;m shocked to hear you&#8217;re getting &#8220;only&#8221; a few hundred spams on a blog as visible and long-running as this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255925</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255925</guid>
		<description>I've been having problems posting at blogspot too.  Nice to know they're not just picking on &lt;i&gt;me&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been having problems posting at blogspot too.  Nice to know they&#8217;re not just picking on <i>me</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daran</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255912</link>
		<dc:creator>Daran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255912</guid>
		<description>I'm getting about 20 spams a day at feministcritics.org.  The spam to my personal blog at cddaran.wordpress.com has fallen to nothing, as have search engine hits.  (I duplicated the content at feministcritics, which does get the hits, so I'm guessing the search engines don't show it at cddaran any more.)  I conjecture that spammers use search engines to determine which blogs are popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting about 20 spams a day at <a href="http://feministcritics.org" title="http://feministcritics.org">feministcritics.org</a>.  The spam to my personal blog at <a href="http://cddaran.wordpress.com" title="http://cddaran.wordpress.com">cddaran.wordpress.com</a> has fallen to nothing, as have search engine hits.  (I duplicated the content at feministcritics, which does get the hits, so I&#8217;m guessing the search engines don&#8217;t show it at cddaran any more.)  I conjecture that spammers use search engines to determine which blogs are popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArrogantWorm</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255894</link>
		<dc:creator>ArrogantWorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255894</guid>
		<description>400+ pieces of spam? Ouch. That's got to suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>400+ pieces of spam? Ouch. That&#8217;s got to suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nexyjo</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255817</link>
		<dc:creator>nexyjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255817</guid>
		<description>just testing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just testing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defenestrated</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255799</link>
		<dc:creator>defenestrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255799</guid>
		<description>aha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255789</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 06:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255789</guid>
		<description>I just opened BNN up to general commenting, with Akismet in place, and I see hundreds of spams a day now. (Up from basically none when we had required registration and moderated first post.) 

My "solution" to the being-blocked problem was to stop linking my website(s) in my little name thingy there. Then it lets my comments through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just opened BNN up to general commenting, with Akismet in place, and I see hundreds of spams a day now. (Up from basically none when we had required registration and moderated first post.) </p>
<p>My &#8220;solution&#8221; to the being-blocked problem was to stop linking my website(s) in my little name thingy there. Then it lets my comments through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ampersand</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255785</link>
		<dc:creator>Ampersand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 06:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-255785</guid>
		<description>On another thread, Defenestrated writes:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey Amp - didn’t there used to be a “Your comment is awaiting moderation” message? I keep making an ass of myself :( &lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, I keep making an ass of you - but it's not intentional. 

For some reason, the Akismet spam-blocker thinks you're spam. I have no idea that your posts have been caught by Akismet until you mention it in comments; once you mention in comments that you've had posts disappear, I go into the Akismet folder and find and rescue your comments.

So that's why your comments aren't appearing until after you've publicly said "well, my comment has been eaten." Sorry 'bout that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On another thread, Defenestrated writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hey Amp - didn’t there used to be a “Your comment is awaiting moderation” message? I keep making an ass of myself :( </p></blockquote>
<p>No, I keep making an ass of you - but it&#8217;s not intentional. </p>
<p>For some reason, the Akismet spam-blocker thinks you&#8217;re spam. I have no idea that your posts have been caught by Akismet until you mention it in comments; once you mention in comments that you&#8217;ve had posts disappear, I go into the Akismet folder and find and rescue your comments.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s why your comments aren&#8217;t appearing until after you&#8217;ve publicly said &#8220;well, my comment has been eaten.&#8221; Sorry &#8217;bout that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IST Control Center</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-271916</link>
		<dc:creator>IST Control Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/03/13/problems-leaving-comments/#comment-271916</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;      Problems Leaving Comments     - Mar 13, 2007    - Ampersand      Pope Calls Opposition To Death Penalty “Not Negotiable”; Media Misses It     - Mar 13, 2007    - Ampersand      Limited Contact     - Mar 13, 2007 &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->      Problems Leaving Comments     - Mar 13, 2007    - Ampersand      Pope Calls Opposition To Death Penalty “Not Negotiable”; Media Misses It     - Mar 13, 2007    - Ampersand      Limited Contact     - Mar 13, 2007 <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
