<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: A Long Way Home Part 2 (Spoilers)</title>
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/04/15/review-a-long-way-home-part-2-spoilers/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carnadosa</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/04/15/review-a-long-way-home-part-2-spoilers/#comment-282642</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnadosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/04/15/review-a-long-way-home-part-2-spoilers/#comment-282642</guid>
		<description>Maybe the protection could only be physical harm?  I think that protection against &lt;i&gt;intent&lt;/i&gt; in general wouldn't be possible.  If there was a spell that could protect dreams, wouldn't it mess with slayer dreams?

I just assumed whatever protection she had was on &lt;i&gt;her&lt;/i&gt; and not the bed.  The bed posts are just twisted (spelled) around her wrists and ankles.  

&lt;i&gt;Really&lt;/i&gt; causal watcher.  I'm positive you know the canon better then I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the protection could only be physical harm?  I think that protection against <i>intent</i> in general wouldn&#8217;t be possible.  If there was a spell that could protect dreams, wouldn&#8217;t it mess with slayer dreams?</p>
<p>I just assumed whatever protection she had was on <i>her</i> and not the bed.  The bed posts are just twisted (spelled) around her wrists and ankles.  </p>
<p><i>Really</i> causal watcher.  I&#8217;m positive you know the canon better then I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
