<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feminist Reading Recommendations, Sci-Fi Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ledasmom</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-294202</link>
		<dc:creator>Ledasmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 20:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-294202</guid>
		<description>Esther Friesner - "Psalms of Herod", "Sword of Mary", "Yesterday We Saw Mermaids" and others I can't remember at the moment, as well as the short story "A Birthday".  For someone who's mainly famous for writing humorous fiction, she does the serious stuff very, very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esther Friesner - &#8220;Psalms of Herod&#8221;, &#8220;Sword of Mary&#8221;, &#8220;Yesterday We Saw Mermaids&#8221; and others I can&#8217;t remember at the moment, as well as the short story &#8220;A Birthday&#8221;.  For someone who&#8217;s mainly famous for writing humorous fiction, she does the serious stuff very, very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magniloquence</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-294109</link>
		<dc:creator>Magniloquence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-294109</guid>
		<description>Much of &lt;a href="http://www.dendarii.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Lois McMaster Bujold's&lt;/a&gt; work  is, if not actively feminist, then certainly good at portraying women as awesome, well-rounded women.  (The only reason I don't feel comfortable describing all of her work as actively feminist is that I'm not sure she would characterize it that way)  Even her &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lois_McMaster_Bujold#The_Vorkosigan_Saga" rel="nofollow"&gt;Vorkosigan novels&lt;/a&gt;, which center around a male protagonist in an exceedingly patriarchal society, offer what I would read as pointedly feminist criticisms of strict gender roles and patriarchal society. 

And her fantasy is &lt;i&gt;awesome&lt;/i&gt;.

She is also the editor/force behind the &lt;a href="http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/b/lois-mcmaster-bujold/women-at-war.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Women at War&lt;/a&gt; anthology, which is said to be "the first-ever original anthology of military SF by women, about women at war."  Most of the stories are, ah, not what I'd call explicitly feminist, but the &lt;i&gt;project&lt;/i&gt; is definitely feminist in nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of <a href="http://www.dendarii.com/" rel="nofollow">Lois McMaster Bujold&#8217;s</a> work  is, if not actively feminist, then certainly good at portraying women as awesome, well-rounded women.  (The only reason I don&#8217;t feel comfortable describing all of her work as actively feminist is that I&#8217;m not sure she would characterize it that way)  Even her <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lois_McMaster_Bujold#The_Vorkosigan_Saga" rel="nofollow">Vorkosigan novels</a>, which center around a male protagonist in an exceedingly patriarchal society, offer what I would read as pointedly feminist criticisms of strict gender roles and patriarchal society. </p>
<p>And her fantasy is <i>awesome</i>.</p>
<p>She is also the editor/force behind the <a href="http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/b/lois-mcmaster-bujold/women-at-war.htm" rel="nofollow">Women at War</a> anthology, which is said to be &#8220;the first-ever original anthology of military SF by women, about women at war.&#8221;  Most of the stories are, ah, not what I&#8217;d call explicitly feminist, but the <i>project</i> is definitely feminist in nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndiF</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-294036</link>
		<dc:creator>AndiF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 11:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-294036</guid>
		<description>Candas Jane Dorsey's A Paradigm of Earth is brilliant.

I think everyone should read every one of Joan Slonczewski's books and I think she should write a lot more of them.

And I can't say enough good things about Arnason's Woman of the Iron People.

I wish she'd finish the series but I still strongly recommend Rosemary Kirstein's Steerswoman books.

And I like to give some kudos to Jack McDevitt for being one of the few male scifi writers who consistently writes great women characters (plus I love the archeology).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candas Jane Dorsey&#8217;s A Paradigm of Earth is brilliant.</p>
<p>I think everyone should read every one of Joan Slonczewski&#8217;s books and I think she should write a lot more of them.</p>
<p>And I can&#8217;t say enough good things about Arnason&#8217;s Woman of the Iron People.</p>
<p>I wish she&#8217;d finish the series but I still strongly recommend Rosemary Kirstein&#8217;s Steerswoman books.</p>
<p>And I like to give some kudos to Jack McDevitt for being one of the few male scifi writers who consistently writes great women characters (plus I love the archeology).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matttbastard</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293995</link>
		<dc:creator>matttbastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 23:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293995</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I tend to agree with that. Gary K. Wolf[e] had it right, regardless of  John Clute's &lt;a href="http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue325/excess.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;rather snippy rejection of charitable interpretation&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;In an extremely well-argued Locus review of Oryx and Crake, Gary K. Wolfe treats Atwood's claims—that she does not write SF, that Oryx and Crake is not SF at all because SF is "about spaceships" and squiggly things, and that she writes "speculative fiction" instead, though without mentioning Robert A. Heinlein, who first used that term half a century ago—as quite possibly representing a natural aversion to the less attractive aspects of genre marketing; that "she's not demeaning the SF market so much as protecting the Atwood market." I believe this is almost certainly the case. But words do have consequences, even words Atwood well may have taken down verbatim from the publisher and parroted. Atwood's utterances, made in public to the world, are palpably untrue or misleading, and every slurry in the face of honest discourse damages that fragile world, even untruths about forms of literature.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ohhh &lt;b&gt;Alien Sex&lt;/b&gt; - another fine choice! '&lt;i&gt;Roadside Rescue&lt;/i&gt;' is a great story (interesting how Cadigan is still largely recognized as a 'cyberpunk', even though the majority of her work isn't even SF.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I tend to agree with that. Gary K. Wolf[e] had it right, regardless of  John Clute&#8217;s <a href="http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue325/excess.html" rel="nofollow">rather snippy rejection of charitable interpretation</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In an extremely well-argued Locus review of Oryx and Crake, Gary K. Wolfe treats Atwood&#8217;s claims—that she does not write SF, that Oryx and Crake is not SF at all because SF is &#8220;about spaceships&#8221; and squiggly things, and that she writes &#8220;speculative fiction&#8221; instead, though without mentioning Robert A. Heinlein, who first used that term half a century ago—as quite possibly representing a natural aversion to the less attractive aspects of genre marketing; that &#8220;she&#8217;s not demeaning the SF market so much as protecting the Atwood market.&#8221; I believe this is almost certainly the case. But words do have consequences, even words Atwood well may have taken down verbatim from the publisher and parroted. Atwood&#8217;s utterances, made in public to the world, are palpably untrue or misleading, and every slurry in the face of honest discourse damages that fragile world, even untruths about forms of literature.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ohhh <b>Alien Sex</b> - another fine choice! &#8216;<i>Roadside Rescue</i>&#8216; is a great story (interesting how Cadigan is still largely recognized as a &#8216;cyberpunk&#8217;, even though the majority of her work isn&#8217;t even SF.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandolin</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293990</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293990</guid>
		<description>Even if she does 'disdain' the genre (and I know she says things like &lt;u&gt;Oryx and Crake&lt;/u&gt; aren't science fiction, which admittedly makes me giggle), I don't really blame her. She should do what she thinks will get her voice acknowledged. (My beef is with the editors and agents and professors who take her claims of not being SF at face value!)

Re: Pat Cadigan, maybe I should have reocmmended &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Alien-Sex-Masters-Science-Fiction/dp/0451451422/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-6255662-7794319?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1179871421&#038;sr=1-1" rel="nofollow"&gt;Alien Sex&lt;/a&gt;. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if she does &#8216;disdain&#8217; the genre (and I know she says things like <u>Oryx and Crake</u> aren&#8217;t science fiction, which admittedly makes me giggle), I don&#8217;t really blame her. She should do what she thinks will get her voice acknowledged. (My beef is with the editors and agents and professors who take her claims of not being SF at face value!)</p>
<p>Re: Pat Cadigan, maybe I should have reocmmended <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Alien-Sex-Masters-Science-Fiction/dp/0451451422/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-6255662-7794319?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1179871421&#038;sr=1-1" rel="nofollow">Alien Sex</a>. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matttbastard</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293989</link>
		<dc:creator>matttbastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293989</guid>
		<description>You can't go wrong with (more) Murphy, or Kress (or Patricia Anthony, or Mary Rosenblum, or Pat Cadigan, or Karen Joy Fowler [Sarah Canary and Sister Noon - gush!!1])

&lt;blockquote&gt;(Personally, I just repeat the words Handmaid’s Tale like a mantra, which is surprisingly ineffective.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, 'cause Handmaid's Tale is teh serious, TLS-approved capitol-L &lt;i&gt;Literature&lt;/i&gt;, and thus couldn't &lt;i&gt;possibly&lt;/i&gt; be Sci-Fi [sic].  ;)

(Sidenote: IMO Atwood takes unfair lumps in the SF community for her supposed 'disdain' for the genre; I think she's just stuck in the now-antiquated 'Speculative' vs 'Science' dispute from the '70s.  A lot of what she says about SF could easily have come from Merril or Damon Knight back in the day.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t go wrong with (more) Murphy, or Kress (or Patricia Anthony, or Mary Rosenblum, or Pat Cadigan, or Karen Joy Fowler [Sarah Canary and Sister Noon - gush!!1])</p>
<blockquote><p>(Personally, I just repeat the words Handmaid’s Tale like a mantra, which is surprisingly ineffective.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, &#8217;cause Handmaid&#8217;s Tale is teh serious, TLS-approved capitol-L <i>Literature</i>, and thus couldn&#8217;t <i>possibly</i> be Sci-Fi [sic].  ;)</p>
<p>(Sidenote: IMO Atwood takes unfair lumps in the SF community for her supposed &#8216;disdain&#8217; for the genre; I think she&#8217;s just stuck in the now-antiquated &#8216;Speculative&#8217; vs &#8216;Science&#8217; dispute from the &#8217;70s.  A lot of what she says about SF could easily have come from Merril or Damon Knight back in the day.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandolin</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293987</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293987</guid>
		<description>I really need to read more Pat Murphy. And Nancy Kress. And lots of other people. ;-)

McHugh taught at &lt;a href="http://clarionwest.org/website/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Clarion West&lt;/a&gt; last year. A friend of mine who was in her class told me that he recommends &lt;u&gt;China Mountain Zhang&lt;/u&gt; to anyone who complains that science fiction doesn't produce good work. (Personally, I just repeat the words &lt;u&gt;Handmaid's Tale&lt;/u&gt; like a mantra, which is surprisingly ineffective.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really need to read more Pat Murphy. And Nancy Kress. And lots of other people. ;-)</p>
<p>McHugh taught at <a href="http://clarionwest.org/website/index.html" rel="nofollow">Clarion West</a> last year. A friend of mine who was in her class told me that he recommends <u>China Mountain Zhang</u> to anyone who complains that science fiction doesn&#8217;t produce good work. (Personally, I just repeat the words <u>Handmaid&#8217;s Tale</u> like a mantra, which is surprisingly ineffective.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matttbastard</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293986</link>
		<dc:creator>matttbastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293986</guid>
		<description>My recommendations:

Pat Murphy's short story collection &lt;b&gt;Points of Departure&lt;/b&gt; (featuring the amazing &lt;i&gt;'Women in the Trees'&lt;/i&gt; and the  better-known award-winning novelette &lt;i&gt;'Rachel in Love'&lt;/i&gt;)  is well worth seeking out. The book is unfortunately not in print, but &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0553286153/ref=dp_olp_0/104-3437561-0720752?ie=UTF8&#38;condition=all" rel="nofollow"&gt;Amazon&lt;/a&gt; has a list of used booksellers with copies available (oh how I miss the Spectra Special Editions line :().  Her Nebula-award winning novel &lt;b&gt;The Falling Woman&lt;/b&gt;, though more fantasy (or magical realist/interstitial/slipstream, if you prefer), is also a great read.

Also highly recommended (though non-fiction) is &lt;b&gt;Better to have Loved: The Life of Judith Merril&lt;/b&gt;, an entertaining, informative, and at times infuriating portrait (begun by Merril prior to her death and completed by her granddaughter, Emily Pohl-Weary) of the iconoclastic writer, editor, OG &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futurians" rel="nofollow"&gt;Futurian&lt;/a&gt; and New Wave champion, without whom Canada's SF scene would not be what it is today (ie, in existence).  The section where Merril recounts her on-the-ground impressions of the '68 Democratic National Convention (which led to her emigration to Canada) is riveting.  I first discovered the ex-pat Merril at a very young age (around 3 or so) during her stint 'hosting' Doctor Who on Ontario's public broadcaster, TVO.  I give her, the good Doctor and Luke Skywalker credit for cultivating my life-long love affair with SF.

Continuing with the Canuckistan theme, anything by Candas Jane Dorsey is worth tracking down, especially her (solo) debut novel, &lt;b&gt;Black Wine&lt;/b&gt; (which, like TFW, is only nominally SF, but whatevs :P).

Oh, and kudos to you, Mandolin, for including &lt;b&gt;China Mountain Zhang&lt;/b&gt;, one of my favourite SF novels published in the '90s.  McHugh is an underappreciated talent.   And I too think Charnas' work deserves more attention outside the SF community.  &lt;b&gt;The Vampire Tapestry&lt;/b&gt; is another unfairly obscure masterpiece which &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; be universally acclaimed (but isn't).

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My recommendations:</p>
<p>Pat Murphy&#8217;s short story collection <b>Points of Departure</b> (featuring the amazing <i>&#8216;Women in the Trees&#8217;</i> and the  better-known award-winning novelette <i>&#8216;Rachel in Love&#8217;</i>)  is well worth seeking out. The book is unfortunately not in print, but <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0553286153/ref=dp_olp_0/104-3437561-0720752?ie=UTF8&amp;condition=all" rel="nofollow">Amazon</a> has a list of used booksellers with copies available (oh how I miss the Spectra Special Editions line :().  Her Nebula-award winning novel <b>The Falling Woman</b>, though more fantasy (or magical realist/interstitial/slipstream, if you prefer), is also a great read.</p>
<p>Also highly recommended (though non-fiction) is <b>Better to have Loved: The Life of Judith Merril</b>, an entertaining, informative, and at times infuriating portrait (begun by Merril prior to her death and completed by her granddaughter, Emily Pohl-Weary) of the iconoclastic writer, editor, OG <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futurians" rel="nofollow">Futurian</a> and New Wave champion, without whom Canada&#8217;s SF scene would not be what it is today (ie, in existence).  The section where Merril recounts her on-the-ground impressions of the &#8216;68 Democratic National Convention (which led to her emigration to Canada) is riveting.  I first discovered the ex-pat Merril at a very young age (around 3 or so) during her stint &#8216;hosting&#8217; Doctor Who on Ontario&#8217;s public broadcaster, TVO.  I give her, the good Doctor and Luke Skywalker credit for cultivating my life-long love affair with SF.</p>
<p>Continuing with the Canuckistan theme, anything by Candas Jane Dorsey is worth tracking down, especially her (solo) debut novel, <b>Black Wine</b> (which, like TFW, is only nominally SF, but whatevs :P).</p>
<p>Oh, and kudos to you, Mandolin, for including <b>China Mountain Zhang</b>, one of my favourite SF novels published in the &#8217;90s.  McHugh is an underappreciated talent.   And I too think Charnas&#8217; work deserves more attention outside the SF community.  <b>The Vampire Tapestry</b> is another unfairly obscure masterpiece which <i>should</i> be universally acclaimed (but isn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matttbastard</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293985</link>
		<dc:creator>matttbastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 21:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293985</guid>
		<description>My recommendations:

Pat Murphy's short story collection &lt;b&gt;Points of Departure&lt;/b&gt; (featuring the amazing &lt;i&gt;'Women in the Trees'&lt;/i&gt; and the  better-known award-winning novelette &lt;i&gt;'Rachel in Love'&lt;/i&gt;)  is well worth seeking out. The book is unfortunately not in print, but &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0553286153/ref=dp_olp_0/104-3437561-0720752?ie=UTF8&#38;condition=all" rel="nofollow"&gt;Amazon&lt;/a&gt; has a list of used booksellers with copies available (oh how I miss the Spectra Special Editions line :().  Her Nebula-award winning novel &lt;b&gt;The Falling Woman&lt;/b&gt;, though more fantasy (or magical realist/interstitial/slipstream, if you prefer), is also a great read.

Also highly recommended (though non-fiction) is &lt;a href="" rel="nofollow"&gt;Better to have Loved: The Life of Judith Merril&lt;/a&gt;, an entertaining, informative, and at times infuriating portrait (begun by Merril prior to her death and completed by her granddaughter, Emily Pohl-Weary) of the iconoclastic writer, editor, OG &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futurians" rel="nofollow"&gt;Futurian&lt;/a&gt; and New Wave champion, without whom Canada's SF scene would not be what it is today (ie, in existence).  The section where Merril recounts her on-the-ground impressions of the '68 Democratic National convention (which led to her emigration to Canada) is riveting.  I first discovered the ex-pat Merril at a very young age (around 3 or so) during her stint 'hosting' Doctor Who on Ontario's public broadcaster, TVO.  I give her, the good Doctor and Luke Skywalker credit for cultivating my life-long love affair with SF.

Continuing with the Canuckistan theme, anything by Candas Jane Dorsey is worth tracking down, especially her (solo) debut novel, Black Wine (which, like TFW, is only nominally SF, but whatevs :P).

Oh, and kudos to you, Mandolin, for including &lt;b&gt;China Mountain Zhang&lt;/b&gt;, one of my favourite SF novels published in the '90s.  McHugh is an underappreciated talent.   And I too think Charnas' work deserves more attention outside the SF community.  &lt;b&gt;The Vampire Tapestry&lt;/b&gt; is another unfairly obscure masterpiece which &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; be universally acclaimed (but isn't).

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My recommendations:</p>
<p>Pat Murphy&#8217;s short story collection <b>Points of Departure</b> (featuring the amazing <i>&#8216;Women in the Trees&#8217;</i> and the  better-known award-winning novelette <i>&#8216;Rachel in Love&#8217;</i>)  is well worth seeking out. The book is unfortunately not in print, but <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0553286153/ref=dp_olp_0/104-3437561-0720752?ie=UTF8&amp;condition=all" rel="nofollow">Amazon</a> has a list of used booksellers with copies available (oh how I miss the Spectra Special Editions line :().  Her Nebula-award winning novel <b>The Falling Woman</b>, though more fantasy (or magical realist/interstitial/slipstream, if you prefer), is also a great read.</p>
<p>Also highly recommended (though non-fiction) is <a href="" rel="nofollow">Better to have Loved: The Life of Judith Merril</a>, an entertaining, informative, and at times infuriating portrait (begun by Merril prior to her death and completed by her granddaughter, Emily Pohl-Weary) of the iconoclastic writer, editor, OG <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futurians" rel="nofollow">Futurian</a> and New Wave champion, without whom Canada&#8217;s SF scene would not be what it is today (ie, in existence).  The section where Merril recounts her on-the-ground impressions of the &#8216;68 Democratic National convention (which led to her emigration to Canada) is riveting.  I first discovered the ex-pat Merril at a very young age (around 3 or so) during her stint &#8216;hosting&#8217; Doctor Who on Ontario&#8217;s public broadcaster, TVO.  I give her, the good Doctor and Luke Skywalker credit for cultivating my life-long love affair with SF.</p>
<p>Continuing with the Canuckistan theme, anything by Candas Jane Dorsey is worth tracking down, especially her (solo) debut novel, Black Wine (which, like TFW, is only nominally SF, but whatevs :P).</p>
<p>Oh, and kudos to you, Mandolin, for including <b>China Mountain Zhang</b>, one of my favourite SF novels published in the &#8217;90s.  McHugh is an underappreciated talent.   And I too think Charnas&#8217; work deserves more attention outside the SF community.  <b>The Vampire Tapestry</b> is another unfairly obscure masterpiece which <i>should</i> be universally acclaimed (but isn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Lebovitz</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293941</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Lebovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 11:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293941</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the Arnason link--I like her work a lot and didn't know about that story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the Arnason link&#8211;I like her work a lot and didn&#8217;t know about that story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamChevre</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293815</link>
		<dc:creator>SamChevre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/05/20/feminist-reading-recommendations-sci-fi-edition/#comment-293815</guid>
		<description>Yes, it's YA brain candy; sometimes I think that's the most important genre of fiction.  Almost all of Tamora Pierce's books have central strong female characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s YA brain candy; sometimes I think that&#8217;s the most important genre of fiction.  Almost all of Tamora Pierce&#8217;s books have central strong female characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
