<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The In-fucking-credible Stress Syllable Test</title>
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stentor</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307668</link>
		<dc:creator>Stentor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307668</guid>
		<description>It's an interesting factoid that the "fucking" always gets placed before the stressed syllable. But I find it weird to have it presented as a trick for locating the stressed syllable -- in what context would you know a word well enough to accurately place the "fucking," but not well enough to locate the stressed syllable just by saying the word to yourself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting factoid that the &#8220;fucking&#8221; always gets placed before the stressed syllable. But I find it weird to have it presented as a trick for locating the stressed syllable &#8212; in what context would you know a word well enough to accurately place the &#8220;fucking,&#8221; but not well enough to locate the stressed syllable just by saying the word to yourself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Nolan</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307665</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307665</guid>
		<description>Ledasmom

I don't think "amperfuckingsand" really works - that is, I don't think anyone would say it spontaneously.  In my own exchanges with the owner of this blog, for instance, I always found myself muttering "fucking Ampersand" under my breath, and NEVER "Amperfuckingsand".

Modefuckingration doesn't really count - the tonic accent is actually on the penultimate syllable, which is where it fucking should be.  Sorry, I mean "which is where the 'fucking' says it should be".

It's a pity Robin Williams didn't use my scansion system in "Dead Poets' Society", don't you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ledasmom</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think &#8220;amperfuckingsand&#8221; really works - that is, I don&#8217;t think anyone would say it spontaneously.  In my own exchanges with the owner of this blog, for instance, I always found myself muttering &#8220;fucking Ampersand&#8221; under my breath, and NEVER &#8220;Amperfuckingsand&#8221;.</p>
<p>Modefuckingration doesn&#8217;t really count - the tonic accent is actually on the penultimate syllable, which is where it fucking should be.  Sorry, I mean &#8220;which is where the &#8216;fucking&#8217; says it should be&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a pity Robin Williams didn&#8217;t use my scansion system in &#8220;Dead Poets&#8217; Society&#8221;, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ledasmom</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307656</link>
		<dc:creator>Ledasmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307656</guid>
		<description>I tried this on "ampersand" and came up with "am-per-fucking-sand".  Is there a secondary emphasis on the final syllable of "ampersand", which I have always pronounced with the first syllable stressed?
I then tried it on "moderation", producing "mo-der-fucking-ation",  and concluded that this test identifies a stressed syllable but not necessarily the primarily-stressed syllable in a word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried this on &#8220;ampersand&#8221; and came up with &#8220;am-per-fucking-sand&#8221;.  Is there a secondary emphasis on the final syllable of &#8220;ampersand&#8221;, which I have always pronounced with the first syllable stressed?<br />
I then tried it on &#8220;moderation&#8221;, producing &#8220;mo-der-fucking-ation&#8221;,  and concluded that this test identifies a stressed syllable but not necessarily the primarily-stressed syllable in a word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hectora</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307579</link>
		<dc:creator>Hectora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 20:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307579</guid>
		<description>Seems like it works with initial-syllable-accents to me: you just have an overriding urge to say "fucking paranoid" rather than "parafuckingnoid," aye? Must be an initial-syllable accent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like it works with initial-syllable-accents to me: you just have an overriding urge to say &#8220;fucking paranoid&#8221; rather than &#8220;parafuckingnoid,&#8221; aye? Must be an initial-syllable accent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Nolan</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307573</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 19:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307573</guid>
		<description>Doug

You're right, but so is Ampersand's source: clitic "fucking" cannot be euphoniously fitted into a word which has tonic accent in first place.  Try it: "parafuckingnoid" "imbefuckingcile" - just doesn't sound right, does it?  Such discomfort is an indication that the word begins with an accent or is a monosyllable.

I'm going to start using this in poetry classes.

"Come on Agatha, you can work out what metre that is - &lt;i&gt;The Afuckingssyrian came fucking down like a fucking wolf on the fucking fold&lt;/i&gt;.  That's right, they're anapaests!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, but so is Ampersand&#8217;s source: clitic &#8220;fucking&#8221; cannot be euphoniously fitted into a word which has tonic accent in first place.  Try it: &#8220;parafuckingnoid&#8221; &#8220;imbefuckingcile&#8221; - just doesn&#8217;t sound right, does it?  Such discomfort is an indication that the word begins with an accent or is a monosyllable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to start using this in poetry classes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Come on Agatha, you can work out what metre that is - <i>The Afuckingssyrian came fucking down like a fucking wolf on the fucking fold</i>.  That&#8217;s right, they&#8217;re anapaests!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug S.</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307566</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307566</guid>
		<description>That can't possibly work for a word that has the accent on the first syllable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That can&#8217;t possibly work for a word that has the accent on the first syllable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sailorman</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307517</link>
		<dc:creator>Sailorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307517</guid>
		<description>Well, holy fucking shit.  That's a fun trick, even if it's not 100% for me (I say unfuckingbeLIEVable, not unbefuckingLIEVable)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, holy fucking shit.  That&#8217;s a fun trick, even if it&#8217;s not 100% for me (I say unfuckingbeLIEVable, not unbefuckingLIEVable)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L33tminion</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307513</link>
		<dc:creator>L33tminion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307513</guid>
		<description>@Tom:  I've heard both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tom:  I&#8217;ve heard both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Nolan</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307508</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 10:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/10/20/the-fuck-test/#comment-307508</guid>
		<description>I doesn't seem to work with "unbelievable".  You say "unfuckingbelievable" not "unbefuckinglievable" - or don't you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doesn&#8217;t seem to work with &#8220;unbelievable&#8221;.  You say &#8220;unfuckingbelievable&#8221; not &#8220;unbefuckinglievable&#8221; - or don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
