<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Daughter&#8217;s Vagina, Part 9</title>
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Minna</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313689</link>
		<dc:creator>Minna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313689</guid>
		<description>I would hazard that if sex was painful for most/all women, then women would be far less likely to want to have it.

Doesn't hurt me, thank god.

RJN, thank you for sharing this.  I can't imagine that it's easy to write, let alone share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hazard that if sex was painful for most/all women, then women would be far less likely to want to have it.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t hurt me, thank god.</p>
<p>RJN, thank you for sharing this.  I can&#8217;t imagine that it&#8217;s easy to write, let alone share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Jeffrey Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313383</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Jeffrey Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313383</guid>
		<description>You know, I find the formulation "He/I/You [depending on who's saying it] almost killed her with his penis" very interesting. Certainly that's how I felt when Vanessa told me what had happened, but the formulation does replicate the standard male=active subject/female=passive object formulation of heterosexuality and therefore very neatly elides the fact that Vanessa was not only a willing participant in, but that she initiated, the sex we had. Whichever part of her vagina it was that ruptured (because I really don't remember what she told me) could have ruptured when I was on top of her or when she was on top of me; it could have happened because of a way I moved inside of her while she was relatively still, a way that she moved with me inside her while I was relatively still, or a movement that we both made at more or less the same time. It was, in other words, something that happened while &lt;i&gt;we&lt;/i&gt; were having sex &lt;i&gt;with each other&lt;/i&gt;, not while I was doing something &lt;i&gt;to&lt;/i&gt; her.

I am saying this because it occurred to me while thinking about people's responses to Wicked Child's comments that one of the reasons I was suspicious of Vanessa was that I felt manipulated by the way she told me what happened, as if she were trying to trap me in guilt. I am not accusing her now of &lt;i&gt;being&lt;/i&gt; manipulative--though for a long time I did. I am simply describing how the way she told me made me feel. It's true she said she didn't hold me responsible; yet she also made it clear that this was something I did to her, something that I, not she, (not we) was reponsible for, even though she was willing to absolve me of that reponsibility. It was, suddenly, as if I had initiated the sex we had, as if the whole thing had been my idea.

Again, I am not trying to blame her for how she told me, even if she said it that way with the explicit intent of trying to absolve herself retroactively of responsibility and imprisoning me in a kind of perpetual guilt. She had after all almost bled to death; any guilt or discomfort I might have felt after the fact pales in comparison to that.  But the way she told me did leave me feeling manipulated, and I think it's interesting how easily we fall into the male/subject female/object formulation in thinking about something like what I wrote about in this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I find the formulation &#8220;He/I/You [depending on who&#8217;s saying it] almost killed her with his penis&#8221; very interesting. Certainly that&#8217;s how I felt when Vanessa told me what had happened, but the formulation does replicate the standard male=active subject/female=passive object formulation of heterosexuality and therefore very neatly elides the fact that Vanessa was not only a willing participant in, but that she initiated, the sex we had. Whichever part of her vagina it was that ruptured (because I really don&#8217;t remember what she told me) could have ruptured when I was on top of her or when she was on top of me; it could have happened because of a way I moved inside of her while she was relatively still, a way that she moved with me inside her while I was relatively still, or a movement that we both made at more or less the same time. It was, in other words, something that happened while <i>we</i> were having sex <i>with each other</i>, not while I was doing something <i>to</i> her.</p>
<p>I am saying this because it occurred to me while thinking about people&#8217;s responses to Wicked Child&#8217;s comments that one of the reasons I was suspicious of Vanessa was that I felt manipulated by the way she told me what happened, as if she were trying to trap me in guilt. I am not accusing her now of <i>being</i> manipulative&#8211;though for a long time I did. I am simply describing how the way she told me made me feel. It&#8217;s true she said she didn&#8217;t hold me responsible; yet she also made it clear that this was something I did to her, something that I, not she, (not we) was reponsible for, even though she was willing to absolve me of that reponsibility. It was, suddenly, as if I had initiated the sex we had, as if the whole thing had been my idea.</p>
<p>Again, I am not trying to blame her for how she told me, even if she said it that way with the explicit intent of trying to absolve herself retroactively of responsibility and imprisoning me in a kind of perpetual guilt. She had after all almost bled to death; any guilt or discomfort I might have felt after the fact pales in comparison to that.  But the way she told me did leave me feeling manipulated, and I think it&#8217;s interesting how easily we fall into the male/subject female/object formulation in thinking about something like what I wrote about in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Jeffrey Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313345</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Jeffrey Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313345</guid>
		<description>grendelkhan:

Thanks for the citation; it never occurred to me to try to work into this essay actual medical information. It's something to ponder if I ever edit this piece again. One quibble: I do not think I ever make the point in the essay that what happened to Vanessa is not-infrequent. 

Everyone else:

Thanks for your supportive words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>grendelkhan:</p>
<p>Thanks for the citation; it never occurred to me to try to work into this essay actual medical information. It&#8217;s something to ponder if I ever edit this piece again. One quibble: I do not think I ever make the point in the essay that what happened to Vanessa is not-infrequent. </p>
<p>Everyone else:</p>
<p>Thanks for your supportive words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandy V.</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313341</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandy V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313341</guid>
		<description>Can you blame him? Yes, I suppose you can, but look at it this way, at this moment in time, he's 19, he's &lt;i&gt;scared&lt;/i&gt;, he nearly killed a girl &lt;i&gt;with his penis&lt;/i&gt;, of all the crazy things in the world. I don't see him trying to make this all her fault at all, especially when he says, "&lt;i&gt;I did not want a body that could do this to another person&lt;/i&gt;". He wonders, maybe wishes that she's lying, but he knows in his heart she wouldn't. Even after consulting  with someone who claims a thorough knowledge of medicine, he is not completely convinced.

Also, take into consideration that Richard is not a woman and can't imagine our nerve endings--the inner walls of the vagina don't actually feel that much (hello, tampons!), it's the clitoris where all the stimulation usually takes place. Plus, you're having sex. He could be slowly wittling away into the walls of her vagina, yes, but that could be gradual, with time for an orgasm to build in Vanessa. Pleasure masks pain. She probably did &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; show any indications of pain, outside the normal discomfort of intercourse. Maybe right after she had sex, Vanessa also wondered if she was having her period--before being onset with what I imagine would feel like the worst case of cramps ever.

It probably would feel seem amazing to somebody with a penis. There probably would be an "Are you kidding? Seriously?" reaction to something like that, because men feel so much with their penis. I would wonder if she was lying too. But I wouldn't be able to reason why somebody would lie about that. Richard is not a monster, but a human being, who is far from omniscient. Give him a break for feeling guilty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you blame him? Yes, I suppose you can, but look at it this way, at this moment in time, he&#8217;s 19, he&#8217;s <i>scared</i>, he nearly killed a girl <i>with his penis</i>, of all the crazy things in the world. I don&#8217;t see him trying to make this all her fault at all, especially when he says, &#8220;<i>I did not want a body that could do this to another person</i>&#8220;. He wonders, maybe wishes that she&#8217;s lying, but he knows in his heart she wouldn&#8217;t. Even after consulting  with someone who claims a thorough knowledge of medicine, he is not completely convinced.</p>
<p>Also, take into consideration that Richard is not a woman and can&#8217;t imagine our nerve endings&#8211;the inner walls of the vagina don&#8217;t actually feel that much (hello, tampons!), it&#8217;s the clitoris where all the stimulation usually takes place. Plus, you&#8217;re having sex. He could be slowly wittling away into the walls of her vagina, yes, but that could be gradual, with time for an orgasm to build in Vanessa. Pleasure masks pain. She probably did <i>not</i> show any indications of pain, outside the normal discomfort of intercourse. Maybe right after she had sex, Vanessa also wondered if she was having her period&#8211;before being onset with what I imagine would feel like the worst case of cramps ever.</p>
<p>It probably would feel seem amazing to somebody with a penis. There probably would be an &#8220;Are you kidding? Seriously?&#8221; reaction to something like that, because men feel so much with their penis. I would wonder if she was lying too. But I wouldn&#8217;t be able to reason why somebody would lie about that. Richard is not a monster, but a human being, who is far from omniscient. Give him a break for feeling guilty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grendelkhan</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313339</link>
		<dc:creator>grendelkhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313339</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Wicked Child&lt;/b&gt;: You don’t even consider how painful sex is for women&lt;/blockquote&gt; I think your partner is Doing It Wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><b>Wicked Child</b>: You don’t even consider how painful sex is for women</p></blockquote>
<p> I think your partner is Doing It Wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myca</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313338</link>
		<dc:creator>Myca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313338</guid>
		<description>Wicked Child, your tone of attack in your comments, especially in terming RJN a 'monster' makes me uncomfortable.

This is doubly true because he addresses nearly everything from your latest comment in his post, including your contention that he "decided that she was lying about it," which by my reading he manifestly did not.


---Myca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wicked Child, your tone of attack in your comments, especially in terming RJN a &#8216;monster&#8217; makes me uncomfortable.</p>
<p>This is doubly true because he addresses nearly everything from your latest comment in his post, including your contention that he &#8220;decided that she was lying about it,&#8221; which by my reading he manifestly did not.</p>
<p>&#8212;Myca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wicked Child</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313336</link>
		<dc:creator>Wicked Child</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313336</guid>
		<description>You nearly killed a girl. Then you decided that she was lying about it. You don't even consider how painful sex is for women -- you assume that since you weren't in any pain, she wasn't either.  What gives you the right to tell this story? Does Vanessa want this to be made public? Does she even know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You nearly killed a girl. Then you decided that she was lying about it. You don&#8217;t even consider how painful sex is for women &#8212; you assume that since you weren&#8217;t in any pain, she wasn&#8217;t either.  What gives you the right to tell this story? Does Vanessa want this to be made public? Does she even know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grendelkhan</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313335</link>
		<dc:creator>grendelkhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313335</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Thene&lt;/b&gt;: What happened to you with Vanessa happened to a friend of mine about a year ago; they’re still together, because they love each other, but from what he’s said their sex life is yet to fully recover.&lt;/blockquote&gt; What on earth &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; happen to Vanessa and to this friend of yours? I've never heard of such a thing, and from what I've read here, I'm grotesquely remiss in my knowledge.

And &lt;i&gt;sheesh&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;b&gt;Richard Jeffrey Newman&lt;/b&gt;, if you're going to drop the bomb that women are not-infrequently so fragile that non-painful sex might just cause them to up and croak in the middle of the ensuing night, could you at least provide a bit more information about this? I've found a few &lt;a href="www.jaoa.org/cgi/reprint/106/5/271.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;journal articles&lt;/a&gt;, but nothing for a lay audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><b>Thene</b>: What happened to you with Vanessa happened to a friend of mine about a year ago; they’re still together, because they love each other, but from what he’s said their sex life is yet to fully recover.</p></blockquote>
<p> What on earth <i>did</i> happen to Vanessa and to this friend of yours? I&#8217;ve never heard of such a thing, and from what I&#8217;ve read here, I&#8217;m grotesquely remiss in my knowledge.</p>
<p>And <i>sheesh</i>, <b>Richard Jeffrey Newman</b>, if you&#8217;re going to drop the bomb that women are not-infrequently so fragile that non-painful sex might just cause them to up and croak in the middle of the ensuing night, could you at least provide a bit more information about this? I&#8217;ve found a few <a href="www.jaoa.org/cgi/reprint/106/5/271.pdf" rel="nofollow">journal articles</a>, but nothing for a lay audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ampersand</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313292</link>
		<dc:creator>Ampersand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313292</guid>
		<description>Piddling typo patrol: "it was so unavoidably clear that first time &lt;b&gt;tat &lt;/b&gt;we had nothing to say to each other..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piddling typo patrol: &#8220;it was so unavoidably clear that first time <b>tat </b>we had nothing to say to each other&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thene</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313287</link>
		<dc:creator>Thene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313287</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Richard&lt;/b&gt;, I'm glad it is 'good' to know - though if I hadn't expected that to be the case, I would not have mentioned a friend's sex life on the internet.

I'm now wondering how common the problem is, and whether your med student friend's reaction - that it was unlikely, that she might be &lt;i&gt;lying about her body&lt;/i&gt; - is also common.  Men accusing women of lying about things their bodies' experience during sex, and then using privileged positions to make 'She's Lying' be canonical truth, isn't too rare; the other instance I'm thinking of atm is &lt;a href="http://www.fiawol.demon.co.uk/FAC/femejac.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;the BBFC's declaration that female ejaculation doesn't exist, couldn't possibly exist, and is thus obscene and can't be shown on film&lt;/a&gt;.

Then there's the more common, less life-threatening, but painful instances of broken frenulums during oral sex.  I bet everyone knows a few people who've done that.  Seems like it gets treated as an embarrassing joke, at least once the wound has healed.  Medical professionals take it in their stride.  Can it happen to people who perform cunnilingus, or is it specific to fellatio?  In other words, is the penis uniquely 'dangerous' to the other sexual body?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Richard</b>, I&#8217;m glad it is &#8216;good&#8217; to know - though if I hadn&#8217;t expected that to be the case, I would not have mentioned a friend&#8217;s sex life on the internet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m now wondering how common the problem is, and whether your med student friend&#8217;s reaction - that it was unlikely, that she might be <i>lying about her body</i> - is also common.  Men accusing women of lying about things their bodies&#8217; experience during sex, and then using privileged positions to make &#8216;She&#8217;s Lying&#8217; be canonical truth, isn&#8217;t too rare; the other instance I&#8217;m thinking of atm is <a href="http://www.fiawol.demon.co.uk/FAC/femejac.htm" rel="nofollow">the BBFC&#8217;s declaration that female ejaculation doesn&#8217;t exist, couldn&#8217;t possibly exist, and is thus obscene and can&#8217;t be shown on film</a>.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the more common, less life-threatening, but painful instances of broken frenulums during oral sex.  I bet everyone knows a few people who&#8217;ve done that.  Seems like it gets treated as an embarrassing joke, at least once the wound has healed.  Medical professionals take it in their stride.  Can it happen to people who perform cunnilingus, or is it specific to fellatio?  In other words, is the penis uniquely &#8216;dangerous&#8217; to the other sexual body?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daisy</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313286</link>
		<dc:creator>Daisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313286</guid>
		<description>Wow, that's one of the more disturbing stories I've heard.

Thank you again for posting the series. It's got layer upon layer of fascinating thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s one of the more disturbing stories I&#8217;ve heard.</p>
<p>Thank you again for posting the series. It&#8217;s got layer upon layer of fascinating thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Jeffrey Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313273</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Jeffrey Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313273</guid>
		<description>Holly--

I was writing specifically about me, not trying to make any grand generalizations, but reading that passage over, I think it would have been more accurate for me to have written, "and we are going to have intercourse," because I was thinking specifically of genital intercourse and not any of the other various ways that heterosexual couples can, as you rightly point out, fuck. I got carried away by my own rhetoric. Thanks for pointing it out to me. I will edit it as soon as I get the chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holly&#8211;</p>
<p>I was writing specifically about me, not trying to make any grand generalizations, but reading that passage over, I think it would have been more accurate for me to have written, &#8220;and we are going to have intercourse,&#8221; because I was thinking specifically of genital intercourse and not any of the other various ways that heterosexual couples can, as you rightly point out, fuck. I got carried away by my own rhetoric. Thanks for pointing it out to me. I will edit it as soon as I get the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313271</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313271</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;when I meet a woman, and we are naked, and we have with us only our own bodies, and we are going to fuck, it is going to be, always, always, my body inside hers&lt;/i&gt;

Huh? Are you saying this at a level of practice (i.e. this is always the way you choose to do it) or at a level of social metaphor (i.e. this is how sex between men and women is always described and contextualized by the dominant notion of "fucking") or what? It's certainly not literally true, in any number of ways, even without anything but bodies involved, and I know plenty of heterosexual couples who wouldn't even consider that "normal sex" for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>when I meet a woman, and we are naked, and we have with us only our own bodies, and we are going to fuck, it is going to be, always, always, my body inside hers</i></p>
<p>Huh? Are you saying this at a level of practice (i.e. this is always the way you choose to do it) or at a level of social metaphor (i.e. this is how sex between men and women is always described and contextualized by the dominant notion of &#8220;fucking&#8221;) or what? It&#8217;s certainly not literally true, in any number of ways, even without anything but bodies involved, and I know plenty of heterosexual couples who wouldn&#8217;t even consider that &#8220;normal sex&#8221; for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Jeffrey Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313255</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Jeffrey Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313255</guid>
		<description>Wicked Child: Assuming that yours is a considered response and not an excuse to call me names, I'd be very interested to hear why you have that response and to know if the response changes by the time you finish reading.

Thene: So you are the second person to tell me that what happened with me and Vanessa has happened to others. Even though I have not stressed about this for a lot of years, it is nonetheless "good" (if I can use that word here" to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wicked Child: Assuming that yours is a considered response and not an excuse to call me names, I&#8217;d be very interested to hear why you have that response and to know if the response changes by the time you finish reading.</p>
<p>Thene: So you are the second person to tell me that what happened with me and Vanessa has happened to others. Even though I have not stressed about this for a lot of years, it is nonetheless &#8220;good&#8221; (if I can use that word here&#8221; to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thene</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313248</link>
		<dc:creator>Thene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313248</guid>
		<description>What happened to you with Vanessa happened to a friend of mine about a year ago; they're still together, because they love each other, but from what he's said their sex life is yet to fully recover.

I'm wary of 'sex is already inside the body' talk because it's at least rubbing conceptual shoulders with 'sex is inside a WOMAN'S body and men have to go pry it out, and once you've got it out of her she's never the same again'.  I understand that that's not what you're saying, but I fear the two are related.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to you with Vanessa happened to a friend of mine about a year ago; they&#8217;re still together, because they love each other, but from what he&#8217;s said their sex life is yet to fully recover.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wary of &#8217;sex is already inside the body&#8217; talk because it&#8217;s at least rubbing conceptual shoulders with &#8217;sex is inside a WOMAN&#8217;S body and men have to go pry it out, and once you&#8217;ve got it out of her she&#8217;s never the same again&#8217;.  I understand that that&#8217;s not what you&#8217;re saying, but I fear the two are related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wicked Child</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313244</link>
		<dc:creator>Wicked Child</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/12/16/my-daughters-vagina-part-9/#comment-313244</guid>
		<description>I have not read the whole series. I have only read the last few entries. About halfway through each of them I found myself thinking, "you are a monster."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not read the whole series. I have only read the last few entries. About halfway through each of them I found myself thinking, &#8220;you are a monster.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
