Comments on: Fun With Diet Gurus

By: RonF

RonF — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:12:48 +0000

Dianne said:

I wouldn’t recommend this diet to anyone who has the next 18 years or so already planned though…

Anybody who’s got the next18 years planned out who thinks that said plan isn’t going to change is fooling themselves pretty seriously.

By: Dianne

Dianne — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:43:28 +0000

Well, as long as we’re listing diets, here’s one that worked for me:

1. Get pregnant. (Yes, this diet is extremely hard for men to follow.)
2. Have bad morning sickness.
3. Wait 9 months.*
4. End up 10-20 pounds below baseline.

I wouldn’t recommend this diet to anyone who has the next 18 years or so already planned though…

*May result in death or disability.

By: RonF

RonF — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:30:52 +0000

Have any of you tried the colonoscopy diet? You don’t take in anything but clear liquids for two days. Then you drink what I’ll call “colon blow” the night before and the morning before your colonoscopy - don’t go more than about 20 feet from a toilet during this phase. I lost about 12 pounds and a pair of underpants in 72 hours on that one.

Then there was a nearly complete loss of dignity a little while later at the hospital as 4 people helped me “accomodate” about 6 feet of fiber optic cable. It made a rather fascinating movie, I must admit, and there’s no question that the drugs were rather fantastic.

By: Robert

Robert — Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:11:57 +0000

I followed the domestic stomach flu version of that diet a couple of years back, Sailorman, and lost about ten pounds. It’s effective but unpleasant. The diet authors really need to mention the law of equal and opposite reactions, though. You’ll need a garbage can AND a toilet.

Good luck getting me to pay you the $157.99, though. The weight all came back.

By: Sailorman

Sailorman — Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:25:13 +0000

I prefer the “Guatemalan diet”

1) Go to Guatemala(*1)
2) Buy and consume some tempting-looking fruit juice from a friendly fruit juice street seller(*2)
3) Lose FIVE pounds in TWELVE HOURS!!! At that rate, you could lose SEVENTY POUNDS IN A WEEK!!!(*3)
4) Repeat as needed.

I hold the patent on this diet, so if you, too, have lost weight in this fashion, please Paypal me $157.99.

(*1) Also effective in other areas of the world, including many areas of the U.S. I only tried it in Guatemala though. It doesn’t work where you already live.
(*2) May require multiple glasses of juice. Also, try eating lettuce.
(*3) May result in death.

By: Barbara B

Barbara B — Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:11:33 +0000

The Atkins diet was and is a safe diet, rich in essential fats. There is an induction phase which lasts only TWO WEEKS, after which nutritious veggies and fruits are gradually added back to the diet. Many people WHO HAVE NEVER READ THE BOOK confuse the induction phase as being the entire diet. Atkins did not encourage people to keep cutting calories lower and lower, as does Kimkins.

The Kimkins diet is nutritionally lacking in essential nutrients and is dangerously low in calories. Many people who have followed it began having serious health issues. And obviously Heidi herself didn’t follow it or she would not now be an obese scam artist who uses fake pictures to make people believe she actually lost weight, which she didn’t.

By: Mimi

Mimi — Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:39:13 +0000

To understand all the light and heat over this you need to peek under the sheets of the low carb community. It’s like a religious cult that reacts to any apostacy.

The Kimkins diet is being spoken of as a scam similar to those diet drugs that caused heart disease, but all it is, is Atkins with calorie counting thrown in. The only danger is if you starve yourself to death, but there are plenty of diets out that are in fact fast diets, like the lemonade diet that Beyonce went on.

Kimmers critics should go to abe.com and order a used copy of Dr. Atkins 1972 first edition. It was way more nutty than the Kimkins diet, and yet it changed over time to be a bit less crazy.

Conclusion: None of these diets are going to work, but the Kimkins critics are a bunch of Atkins loons with no more credibility than Diaz.

By: OhYeahBabe

OhYeahBabe — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:15:55 +0000

The picture fraud is indeed a big deal. However, the diet is dangerous, and her plan behind the plan is worse. She actually tells people it is OK to ‘diet coke fast’ for 45 days. That’s over 6 weeks of nothing but diet coke. Can you imagine?

By: Thene

Thene — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:53:07 +0000

Mayberryfan, it’s even more simple than that: diets don’t work, period.

By: Daran

Daran — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:39:00 +0000

People who need to lose weight must believe they are worth the effort before any diet can work.

I’m not completely sure what “they” means in that sentence. Do you mean

People who need to lose weight must believe themselves to be worth the effort, before any diet can work.

People who need to lose weight must believe the diet to be worth the effort before it can work.

By: Mayberryfan

Mayberryfan — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:05:12 +0000

Most diets fail because it is very difficult to follow a plan and eat correctly. The vast majority of people who are thin are blessed with a metabolism that lets them eat pretty much what they want to eat.

Kimmer’s diet Kimkins is a problem because it is starvation. It encourages people who are struggling with their weight to eat such low calories that they can do serious physical harm to themselves. Kimkins is DANGEROUS.

People who need to lose weight must believe they are worth the effort before any diet can work. Kimkins is NOT the answer.

By: Jake Squid

Jake Squid — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:48:56 +0000

I’m very fond of the latest television campaign for nutrasystem. The small print not only says, “Results not typical,” as they all do, it also says that the examples they show are from a, “previous weight loss system.” How great is that?

By: B. Adu

B. Adu — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:26:37 +0000

diet[s], fraud unmasked.

Hope so.