<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/</link>
	<description>Feminist, anti-racist, pro-fat, plus whatever else we feel like talking about.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Redheaded Stepchild</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343304</link>
		<dc:creator>Redheaded Stepchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343304</guid>
		<description>well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elena Perez</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343300</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena Perez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343300</guid>
		<description>There is a piece up today at the CA NOW blog by Meredith Patterson, &lt;a href="http://www.canow.org/canoworg/2008/11/prop-8-postmortem-part-1-dissecting-history.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;"Prop. 8 Postmortem"&lt;/a&gt; that breaks down the current challenge to the passage of Prop. 8, the legal background for the challenge, and why it may work to preserve marriage equality in California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a piece up today at the CA NOW blog by Meredith Patterson, <a href="http://www.canow.org/canoworg/2008/11/prop-8-postmortem-part-1-dissecting-history.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Prop. 8 Postmortem&#8221;</a> that breaks down the current challenge to the passage of Prop. 8, the legal background for the challenge, and why it may work to preserve marriage equality in California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343296</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343296</guid>
		<description>Great post. I appreciated the repeated references to adoption. More proof that opponents of change don't really give a crap about kids' lives, except as they relate to advancing their own limited, uninformed ideas about the environments in which other people should be raised, while at the same time ignoring that there are plenty of racially homogenous, heteronormative, man-controlled households  in which it is nevertheless unhealthy for children to be raised, for one reason or another. Sorry that sentence was so long  :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I appreciated the repeated references to adoption. More proof that opponents of change don&#8217;t really give a crap about kids&#8217; lives, except as they relate to advancing their own limited, uninformed ideas about the environments in which other people should be raised, while at the same time ignoring that there are plenty of racially homogenous, heteronormative, man-controlled households  in which it is nevertheless unhealthy for children to be raised, for one reason or another. Sorry that sentence was so long  :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten Post Round-Up: Big News In Digestible Bits (Thursday, November 6th) &#171; The Dark Diva Diaries</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343265</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten Post Round-Up: Big News In Digestible Bits (Thursday, November 6th) &#171; The Dark Diva Diaries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343265</guid>
		<description>[...] Change takes time&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Change takes time&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loganotron &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Words of Encouragement from My Friends re: Prop 8</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343245</link>
		<dc:creator>Loganotron &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Words of Encouragement from My Friends re: Prop 8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343245</guid>
		<description>[...] Lene sent met this blog post. Worth a read: It is not fair, of course, to same-sex couples who must wait their turn for equality, any more than the fifties were fair to interracial couples, or the Victorian era was fair to women. And for that reason, those of us who believe in equality must not waver in our commitment to it. If a committee to repeal Proposition 8 has not yet been formed, it must be, and soon. We must ensure that these changes are made as soon as possible, to benefit society as quickly as can be. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lene sent met this blog post. Worth a read: It is not fair, of course, to same-sex couples who must wait their turn for equality, any more than the fifties were fair to interracial couples, or the Victorian era was fair to women. And for that reason, those of us who believe in equality must not waver in our commitment to it. If a committee to repeal Proposition 8 has not yet been formed, it must be, and soon. We must ensure that these changes are made as soon as possible, to benefit society as quickly as can be. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343233</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343233</guid>
		<description>You had me right up until "a righteous wind at our back". The use of "righteous" echoes the same rhetoric that  'conservatives' employ in their own arguments. I think that people feeling too 'righteous' about anything these days is a bit scary. Isn't that what got us here in the first place?

But other than that, I'm with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had me right up until &#8220;a righteous wind at our back&#8221;. The use of &#8220;righteous&#8221; echoes the same rhetoric that  &#8216;conservatives&#8217; employ in their own arguments. I think that people feeling too &#8216;righteous&#8217; about anything these days is a bit scary. Isn&#8217;t that what got us here in the first place?</p>
<p>But other than that, I&#8217;m with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343215</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343215</guid>
		<description>I, too, disagree with the recent legislation - particularly here in Florida. My ex-wife lives with a woman and cannot enjoy any of the privileges granted to a conventionally married couple.

Furthermore, I (a man) live with a woman. Both of us are divorced and have no desire to get legally married, but under the new Florida law we also cannot enjoy said privileges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, disagree with the recent legislation - particularly here in Florida. My ex-wife lives with a woman and cannot enjoy any of the privileges granted to a conventionally married couple.</p>
<p>Furthermore, I (a man) live with a woman. Both of us are divorced and have no desire to get legally married, but under the new Florida law we also cannot enjoy said privileges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady Bonk</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343212</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady Bonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343212</guid>
		<description>I will never in my life understand how these "family values" types see this "marriage is a man and a woman" crap as copacetic with their "values." I am cousin to a kid born of two mommas, and I do not have a friendship with him because his mommas are scared, scared partially because the law does not bless their union. How many kids are there like this, caught in between and having to cope with this wobbly life? This kind of crap hurts children; not hypothetical, what-if children, but real children. It decimates families, real families who are genuinely interested in living their own "family values." I hate this for you, sir, but I am sure you are correct. Justice will eventually find a way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will never in my life understand how these &#8220;family values&#8221; types see this &#8220;marriage is a man and a woman&#8221; crap as copacetic with their &#8220;values.&#8221; I am cousin to a kid born of two mommas, and I do not have a friendship with him because his mommas are scared, scared partially because the law does not bless their union. How many kids are there like this, caught in between and having to cope with this wobbly life? This kind of crap hurts children; not hypothetical, what-if children, but real children. It decimates families, real families who are genuinely interested in living their own &#8220;family values.&#8221; I hate this for you, sir, but I am sure you are correct. Justice will eventually find a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decnavda</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343197</link>
		<dc:creator>Decnavda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343197</guid>
		<description>This was great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myca</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343196</link>
		<dc:creator>Myca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343196</guid>
		<description>I couldn't agree more, Jeff. Well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more, Jeff. Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ampersand</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ampersand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343195</guid>
		<description>(Applause.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Applause.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PG</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343185</link>
		<dc:creator>PG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343185</guid>
		<description>Excellent. Thank you for emphasizing that this is not the first legal battle we've had over marriage, &lt;a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=952711" rel="nofollow"&gt;nor is this the first time that the California Supreme Court has been accused of misreading a constitution to find a right to marriage equality that didn't exist&lt;/a&gt;.

I find the history of the de-gendering of marriage particularly important, because it demonstrates that the law no longer distinguishes spouses on the basis of their sex, except at one point: when determining who can marry in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent. Thank you for emphasizing that this is not the first legal battle we&#8217;ve had over marriage, <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=952711" rel="nofollow">nor is this the first time that the California Supreme Court has been accused of misreading a constitution to find a right to marriage equality that didn&#8217;t exist</a>.</p>
<p>I find the history of the de-gendering of marriage particularly important, because it demonstrates that the law no longer distinguishes spouses on the basis of their sex, except at one point: when determining who can marry in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/05/8/#comment-343181</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amptoons.com/blog/?p=5353#comment-343181</guid>
		<description>Well said.  I'll be the one fighting right there alongside you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.  I&#8217;ll be the one fighting right there alongside you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
